Gonna watch the GGG V SD fight now

[satiev1]

I can see anything from golovkin by 1-4 rnds to a draw to SD by 1-2 rnds depending on how many of the swingrounds you give him.

the robbery talk is ridiculous though, SD had 3 clear rounds, the 3rd, the 5th and the 10th. you then have to give him all the swingrounds to even make an argument he won.

You think there will be a rematch? i think Golovkin fights 1-2 more times and then retires, Canelo being one of those fights obviously.

He will finish his contract 6 fights $100 million

[satiev1]

i can see anything from golovkin by 1-4 rnds to a draw to sd by 1-2 rnds depending on how many of the swingrounds you give him.

The robbery talk is ridiculous though, sd had 3 clear rounds, the 3rd, the 5th and the 10th. You then have to give him all the swingrounds to even make an argument he won.

You think there will be a rematch? I think golovkin fights 1-2 more times and then retires, canelo being one of those fights obviously.

going into the 11th rd the reporters asks rozier how do you have the fight? He goes it's close but we are down. Ggg was landing the cleaner harder shots which is why the judges gave him the fight. The post fight face pictures shows it all with ggg's face looking clean and sergey face ****ed up with both eyes shut.

[MulaKO]

... you can't get 114-113 if you scored 10-10 rounds.....

I had no 10-10 rounds
Never said I did

[NachoMan]

What are you talking about? I don't know if it was done in the past but judges don't give 10 - 10 rounds. They have to pick someone to win the round. And surely there are times they'd love the benefit of rewatching a round to provide a more accurate score. Rewatching would not reduce the accuracy of your call

Is that so? What other sports are you currently learning?

I let your response go for a few hours to give you time to edit or altogether delete, but you left it as is so let me enlighten you a bit. The entirety of your post is incorrect.

I don't want to get long-winded or pedantic with a proper reply, so I will simply recommend you do some research on boxing scoring. Maybe throw the following keywords and phrases into your browser: "unified rules of boxing commissions", "10-point must system."

I will concede that in a purely practical sense you are not entirely wrong. It's true that we hardly ever see 10-10 rounds in championship level boxing these days. The more interesting question to ask is why is this the case. It's certainly not because even rounds and 10-10 scores aren't a real thing. If you want to have the discussion about why we don't see so many evenly scored rounds, then that would be a thread worth making.

[NachoMan]

no offensive taken, if i was to take up your advice tho i would score 3 rounds 10-10. hence why i rewatched them. what was your scorecard?

What would have been so bad about scoring those rounds even? Honestly. You admit to forcing a winner of a round you saw as pretty even - thereby skewing your card for no good reason. The fairer decision would be to just call the round even, yet you, like most people, find that to be somehow weak and indecisive.

I scored it for SD 114-113 (7-5 in rounds, but could have seen it as wide as 8-4), but don't have any problem with your score. My issue isn't with how you saw this fight, but rather your irrational aversion to scoring an even round.

[Vlad_]

round 12: SD is rushing into the inside ward style flurrying bodyshots and then clinching. Golovkin is landing some big left hooks on SD who is looking very ragged, hes still fighting back and lands a nice right hook in the final 30 seconds, Golovkin finishes with a big uppercut. good round for golovkin.

6-6 even. Golovkin wins with the KD. very good fight but not the gatti /ward war that lou dibella was describing.

I had the same. Don't remember if round by round was exactly the same, because several were very close and hard to judge, but I also had it 6-6 apiece with GGG winning due to the KD.

Fantastic performance by Derveyanchenko, and he deserves a rematch or a shot at another title.

[chrisJS]

Just watched it again and come up with the same thoughts. Dereyvchenko didn’t deserve to lose but also GGG by 114-113 looks like a good card. I gave Golovkin the first two and last two. I believe the 4, 6 & I think the 8th or 9 were the swing rounds. 3-0 to either guy seems wrong in those rounds so 2-1 either way giving either guy the fight by a point seems right.

Dereyvchenko deserves another big fight. Think about it. He fought Jacobs in his first major fight without his trainer who’d been feeding Jacobs all the intel on him putting him at a big disadvantage and he goes down early but probably wins 6 or 7 rounds. A fair bit very, very close loss.

This fight, he’s dropped early, cut badly in the second yet of the last 10 rounds wins at least six.

He wins both re-matches IMO.

[Scipio2009]

I had no 10-10 rounds
Never said I did

mlac said that they scored 3 rounds 10-10, and you said you scored things the same way (assuming you also scored rounds even), yet got to 6-6 with a knockdown.

Unless I missed what you said, that's inconsistent.

[MulaKO]

mlac said that they scored 3 rounds 10-10, and you said you scored things the same way (assuming you also scored rounds even), yet got to 6-6 with a knockdown.

Unless I missed what you said, that's inconsistent.

He said he could of scored those rounds even but after rewatching it , he scored it for one or the other

[Citizen Koba]

Ooh, let's go GGG!

Spit out my coffee, man.