Comments Thread For: GGG: Biggest Opponent is My Age & Determination To Keep Boxing

[TonyGe]

Troll confirmed ��

Ooops......

[Real King Kong]

Ooops......

My bad, I read that as him being your alt and you forgetting to switch accounts lol. I guess posting here long enough can lead to jumping to outlandish conclusions.

[MurkaMan]

Lol...you accuse me of deflecting an argument that you raised as a deflection. My stance has been simple...Srl faced better opposition than Floyd, nothing has changed.

But werent you talking about how bad Ortiz was???

But then me pointing out the fact that SRR hasnt faced anyone as good as Ortiz is now a deflection? Hahaha!

Why didnt you just say "Your right, SRR hasnt faced anyone as good as Ortiz, even though I think Ortiz is not that good" Because your holding SRR as well as SRL to a different standard than Floyd right?

You nitpick him but wont do it to anyone else. His easiest fights, would be SRR and SRL's toughest test Lol

And didnt you say, thats the reason you turned the argument into a "modern fighters, vs throwback fighters" debate?

Isnt that deflection?

[MurkaMan]

I didn't deflect anything. Here is your post that I responded to.


1. This is not a response to what I asked. We say he aint that good right? Which I totally disagree with, because he was a monster at 47 against Berto. Floyd just ruined him. But I asked has SRR faced an opponent like him? Which would've been his toughest fight tbh.

2. I feel Ortiz was a top notch opponent, but thats besides the point. The circumstantial disadvantages Floyd was at; He was 34yrs old and 150lbs. Ortiz was 24yrs old and 164lbs.

I didnt really ask if SRL could beat Ortiz. I was asking could SRL beat ANY opponent at thost disadvantages? That age and weight disparity, and the answer is NO!


You were clearly comparing Mayweather to SRR. I responded on topic. You aren't going to change your mind and I'm not either so let's drop it.

No, Im comparing Floyd to every fighter in history. Im very confident that when we place any fighter next to Floyd, he just blows their legacy out the water.

I would like the conversation to continue.

Some Floyd opponents that we pretended like they werent all that good, and Floyd just humiliated them. We never realize that Floyd was overachieving. He shouldnt have been that old, and small, dominating guys that young and big.

It was amazing what we witnessed. No other fighter in history could do it, but Bhop can come close.

I treat all fighters the same. Bhop has done things no other fighter can do, except Floyd. Floyd could possibly be more dominant than Bhop at the age of 50.

See you notice with that King Kong dude, look at our interactions. He cant respond to anything. I have REASONS for why I feel the way that I feel. Floyd has a tougher resume than SRL because of the circumstantial disadvantages.

This is a fact, not an opinion. Not something you could disagree with. Unless Floyd and SRL where both naturally the exact same size.

SRL simply BEAT guys who were the best in his weight class, while he was in his prime. Floyd was past his prime, and humiliated guys that he shouldnt have even been able to beat.

He shouldnt have even won those fights, but he DOMINATED. Im just grateful that it happened in my era.

[MurkaMan]

Troll confirmed ��

Hahahaha!! Idiot. You up here playing troll games, and confused yaself!

[TonyGe]

My bad, I read that as him being your alt and you forgetting to switch accounts lol. I guess posting here long enough can lead to jumping to outlandish conclusions.

No I don't have an alt. LOL. I just responded to you a
by mistake.

[Real King Kong]

But werent you talking about how bad Ortiz was???

But then me pointing out the fact that SRR hasnt faced anyone as good as Ortiz is now a deflection? Hahaha!

Why didnt you just say "Your right, SRR hasnt faced anyone as good as Ortiz, even though I think Ortiz is not that good" Because your holding SRR as well as SRL to a different standard than Floyd right?

You nitpick him but wont do it to anyone else. His easiest fights, would be SRR and SRL's toughest test Lol

And didnt you say, thats the reason you turned the argument into a "modern fighters, vs throwback fighters" debate?

Isnt that deflection?

Ortiz is not a good fighter, period...and srl faced better opposition than mayweather. Not sure why you’re going back to “modern vs throwback”...Leonard is from the modern era himself. We were talking about him having faced better opposition than Floyd, not srr.

[MurkaMan]

Ortiz is not a good fighter, period...and srl faced better opposition than mayweather. Not sure why you’re going back to “modern vs throwback”...Leonard is from the modern era himself. We were talking about him having faced better opposition than Floyd, not srr.

He's not a good fighter, yet when I pointed out that SRR never faced an opponent as good as him, instead of agreeing with me, you said I was deflecting?

Then you tried to switch the conversation to "modern fighters vs throwback fighters", and admitted that you did it because you didnt like the fact that I brought up SRR.

We can end this convo here. And Im glad it happened, because everyone who read all these interactions can see why I feel the way I feel.

You and Tony couldnt even reply to my stance. No one can!

[Real King Kong]

He's not a good fighter, yet when I pointed out that SRR never faced an opponent as good as him, instead of agreeing with me, you said I was deflecting?

Then you tried to switch the conversation to "modern fighters vs throwback fighters", and admitted that you did it because you didnt like the fact that I brought up SRR.

We can end this convo here. And Im glad it happened, because everyone who read all these interactions can see why I feel the way I feel.

You and Tony couldnt even reply to my stance. No one can!

no, I said srr faced a number of fighters better than Ortiz and ridiculed you for rating Ortiz highly in the first place. I speculated that you feel modern fighters are better than fighters from that era, cuz that would be the only logical explanation for why you'd think Ortiz was better than several hofers, when he himself doesn't have a prayer of being inducted into the hof.

[MurkaMan]

no, I said srr faced a number of fighters better than Ortiz and ridiculed you for rating Ortiz highly in the first place. I speculated that you feel modern fighters are better than fighters from that era, cuz that would be the only logical explanation for why you'd think Ortiz was better than several hofers, when he himself doesn't have a prayer of being inducted into the hof.

As if I didnt know that the boxing Hof had plenty of bums in it. Sly Stallone is in the HOF, for making movies.

You never "speculated" anything. You have constantly deflected, trolled and ignored all of my points. Never responded to anything. Never made any sort of case or anything.


If you felt that SRR has faced opponents better than Ortiz, you should've explained why you felt that way. If you felt that "Well because some of them are in the HOF", you should've stated that, then I would've responded "Well the HOF has a bunch of scrubs in it", and that would've been my way of crushing that debate.

Instead, you spin the convo to "modern fighters vs throwback fighters". Then I called you out on it, and you say "Well I did it because you mentioned SRR"????

If I mention SRR thats no reason to manipulate the conversation. If you have a valid point, then you respond to it. But when you dont have a valid point, you ignore it or try to do slick ****, so you can make sure you get away without feeling like your wrong and the other person is right?

Being wrong aint worth all of this. You embarrassed yourself!