Comments Thread For: Errol Spence: I Showed I'm A Real Dog, Can Take A Shot

[Ake-Dawg]

Been a Spence fan for a while now . He can take a shot and is a decent fighter but porter isn’t known for his power .

Last month I thought it would be dangerous for pac to fight Spence but I don’t know anymore . Pac has genuine power and angles that porter could dream off

Porter is a hard MF .... great fight fair play props to both men

Much has been said about Soence getting hit and who has more power than Porter. Seemingly no one wants to give Spence credit for the accurate punches and the knock down. Manny doesn't have the whiskers that Porter has nor does he have the size to stay in the pocket with Spence. Pac has angle's for sure, but the Thurman fight showed that he isn't in and out of danger as fast as he used to be. Plus he won't have the southpaw advantage.

[Ake-Dawg]

Yep. I saw about that many low blows too. I don't know if he can beat Ward the low blow/head butt master... but it would be close.

Spence only proved one thing IMO... he squeaked by a very tough fighter... and he likely won't be as lucky vs a Pac or a Crawford.

What about the clinks in their armor that Benavidez and Thurman showed. Both of those guys laid more leather on Crawford and Pacman than we are used to seeing.

[Ake-Dawg]

Tell me how rounded of a fighter Spence is after he steps up with the P4P #1, A LEVEL- T Crawford. You're wasting everybody's time talking "well rounded exuberance" vs Porter!

This makes no sense. Spence can't be considered well rounded until he fights and beats the P4P #1 guy in boxing? Sounds ridiculous since being well rounded is mutually exclusive of being the best. Further, if Spence is trash and loses to Crawford but not by much, does that mean Crawford is a hype job as well...just not as big of a hype job as Spence.

[Fire4231]

Errol has a FOY with a top five seasoned Welterweight with possibly the best resume outside of Pacquiao.

Errol lands at 44% accuracy and knocks down the same iron chin fighter who no one has looked great against. Errol has two belts at WW.

Now... these bum man fans claim some level of exposure.

Flashback....Tyson Fury loses a quarter of his face fighting #48 in the heavyweight division. It is his second unsung fighter in a row. Yet at that time all we hear is how great Tyson was to fight through a fight that should have been a stoppage and a loss. No rematch demanded by these man fans.

How do you guys live with yourself? You pretend like you want to see the best fight the best. When it happens and lives up to the hype you hate mercilessly.

When the best fight the best it’s usually tooth and nail. Doesn’t make the victory less special in fact it is the opposite.

Maybe just maybe some of y’all are so used to seeing mismatches to protect your heroes that you think blow outs are common place?

Either they don’t know or don’t care to know sh@t about boxing. Yet some how they can’t stop following the sport.

[Straightener]

Much has been said about Soence getting hit and who has more power than Porter. Seemingly no one wants to give Spence credit for the accurate punches and the knock down. Manny doesn't have the whiskers that Porter has nor does he have the size to stay in the pocket with Spence. Pac has angle's for sure, but the Thurman fight showed that he isn't in and out of danger as fast as he used to be. Plus he won't have the southpaw advantage.

It’s a great fight !

Let’s hope it comes off

[Curtis2]

This makes no sense. Spence can't be considered well rounded until he fights and beats the P4P #1 guy in boxing? Sounds ridiculous since being well rounded is mutually exclusive of being the best. Further, if Spence is trash and loses to Crawford but not by much, does that mean Crawford is a hype job as well...just not as big of a hype job as Spence.

Just because Spence did things in the fight that looked well rounded, keep in mind, he looked rounded vs a 9-1 underdog whom was supposed, for the first time be KO'd. Porter overachieved, Spence underachieved based on pre fight expectations. T Crawford would damage Spence with long term effects, probably TKO within 9 rounds. If Spence or corrupt PBC thought differently, they'd be pursuing unification with T Crawford, regardless of street side!

[Bronx2245]

Tell me how rounded of a fighter Spence is after he steps up with the P4P #1, A LEVEL- T Crawford. You're wasting everybody's time talking "well rounded exuberance" vs Porter!

Get at me when Crawford fights someone ranked in the Top 5! It can be a Top 5 WW like Brook or Porter, or P4P Top 5 like Mikey Garcia! Pick your poison! Spence has already done both in 2019 alone! Until then, enjoy Bud vs. the "Mean Machine!" Lol!

[Curtis2]

What impressed me most was that Spence beat Porter up on the inside, way more body shots! He was the one initiating the inside fighting! I expected that when he fought Brook, but not Porter! Spence is a well rounded fighter! SALUTE!

well rounded below the belt puncher....watch the fight again then disagree..

[SplitSecond]

Much has been said about Soence getting hit and who has more power than Porter. Seemingly no one wants to give Spence credit for the accurate punches and the knock down. Manny doesn't have the whiskers that Porter has nor does he have the size to stay in the pocket with Spence. Pac has angle's for sure, but the Thurman fight showed that he isn't in and out of danger as fast as he used to be. Plus he won't have the southpaw advantage.

Pacquiao also has better defense, more accurate, hits har...nvm. I’ll just leave this here.

Hopefully Pacquiao doesn’t hit Spence too hard.

[pasawayako]

Yes errol can take a shot against a feather fisted porter.. lol.