Terence Crawford Is More Accomplished Than Canelo Alvarez & Vasyl Lomachenko (Proof)

[boliodogs]

Terence Crawford
- 35-0-0, 26 KOs
- Three Division World Champion (135, 140, 147)
- Two Division Lineal Champion (135, 140)
- Undisputed (140)
- 13-0-0 in World Title Fights
- 10 Title Defenses

Vasyl Lomachenko
- 14-1-0, 10 KOs
- Three Division World Champion (126, 130, 135)
- One Division Lineal Champion (135)
- Never Undisputed
- 12-1-0 in World Title Fights
- 10 Title Defenses

Canelo Alvarez
- 52-1-2, 35 KOs
- Two Division Champion (154, 160)
- One Division Lineal Champion (160)
- Never Undisputed
- 13-1-1 in World Title Fights
- 9 Title Defenses

Crawford is the only undefeated one out of the three. P4P #1!

That's just your opinion that you are trying to force on everybody else. Let people make up their own minds FFS. I like a few boxers more than Crawford pfp and being undefeated is not the end all be all. To each his own and you haven't proven a damn thing.

[megh50]

Ok, so I'll repost an analysis I did of the last 16 fights for Crawford, Loma and Canelo. I used the last 16 because this is the sample size we have for Loma right now, and people think it already compares favourably with the top guys, so here it is

CRAWFORD
Fighters fought who have also fought for world titles - 14
No of World Champions fought - 6
Collective Win Record of Opponents - 431
Collective Loss Record of Opponents - 61
No of times Opponents have lost by KO - 25

LOMA

Fighters fought who have fought for world titles - 14
No of World Champions fought - 9
Collective Win Record of Opponents - 466
Collective Loss Record of Opponents - 69
No of times Opponents have lost by KO - 28

CANELO

Fighters fought who have fought for world titles - 16
No of World Champions fought - 13
Collective Win Record of Opponents - 583
Collective Loss Record of Opponents - 64
No of times Opponents have lost by KO - 25


In my humble opinion...based on what I have seen I would put Canelo slightly ahead of the Loma and Crawford right now. Canelo has had more fights, but Loma started his title runs much earlier in his campaign, while Canelo is the youngest of the lot. The battle for pound for pound is neck and neck between these three. Loma has the best amateur pedigree having had close to 400 fights and probably has the most wear and tear. The differentiating factor now is Crawford and Canelo are in divisions with far bigger punchers. All have moved up at least 2 divisions but Crawford is the only one who has unified. Only time will tell which of the three turns out to be the better professional, as class eventually shows over time.

[Joe Beamish]

I'd give the edge to Canelo right now as being "more accomplished." I get it, the judges and everybody are slobbing on his knob. But he's fought everybody. I liked him against Jacobs, for example, after the Golovkin fights.

He's faced the boogie men.

The two other guys either lack boogie men to face (Loma) or have not managed, for whatever reason, to face them (Crawford.)

[aboutfkntime]

Terence Crawford
- 35-0-0, 26 KOs
- Three Division World Champion (135, 140, 147)
- Two Division Lineal Champion (135, 140)
- Undisputed (140)
- 13-0-0 in World Title Fights
- 10 Title Defenses

Vasyl Lomachenko
- 14-1-0, 10 KOs
- Three Division World Champion (126, 130, 135)
- One Division Lineal Champion (135)
- Never Undisputed
- 12-1-0 in World Title Fights
- 10 Title Defenses

Canelo Alvarez
- 52-1-2, 35 KOs
- Two Division Champion (154, 160)
- One Division Lineal Champion (160)
- Never Undisputed
- 13-1-1 in World Title Fights
- 9 Title Defenses

Crawford is the only undefeated one out of the three. P4P #1!

NAMES !! ... not bullshlt

pick his 3 best wins... then do the same with the others

[Vodkaholic]

I think Loma has a better resume than both because his isn't padded with worn out Khan.

And no failed peds and controversial wins. Just a controversial loss

[KO MX]

That usually happens when someone outweight his opponents by 20 lbs, he should be fighting at 154

[andocom]

If we are talking boxing accomplishments you would think that 2 Olympic gold medals would at least rate a mention no?

Or are we more concerned about pushing a biased narrative? If that is the case I wonder how else it could be skewed?

Each boxer is obviously at different points in their pro career, so it is only fair we compare the first 16 fights as that is what the newest pro is at, now run those figures for their respective first 16 pro fights and see how we do, sound fair?

[Stokely]

I think Loma has a better resume than both because his isn't padded with worn out Khan.

It’s padded with a loss from bum ass Salido

[strykr619]

Let me translate: Crawford is black, Loma & Canelo are not.

Hit the nail on the head.

[KillaMane26]

TC best win is Gamboa...Who Guess what!? Is about to fight Tank Davis in a mismatchup.

Let that sink in