Mayweather-Castillo 1 was NOT a robbery

[Spoon23]

You most certainly are clueless. Don't know how amateur boxing is scored, don't know how professional boxing is scored, use bias/skewed highlight videos as evidence to support your hilariously weak arguments. Use Lederman and compubox for one fight, deny Lederman and Compubox when they have Mayweather beating Pacquaio LOL! You're an inconsistent, disingenuous, clueless pac tard.

CLUELESS

[daggum]

Except Pacquiao didn't land clean punches, in fact his volume was extremely low in that fight and his punches were constantly hitting air.



This is what you call a clean punch, straight to Pacquiao's jaw.

he landed far better punches than floyd so not sure what you are talking about and thats how you score a boxing match. not based on what you think someone should do but based on what actually was done. volume doenst matter. what matters is clean punching and that was pacs by far.

it was floyd who struggled to land clean flush punches with pac evading/blocking the vast majority of floyds work. posting one or two pics doesn't tell a story of 36 minutes. who landed the better punches in round 3,4, and 6-10? i can tell you it wasnt floyd. were a couple of those rounds close? sure but in a close round the guy landing the hard shots, the shots with leverage behind them, the shots that made a more visable and harder impact should get the round since those punches are by definition cleaner than an arm punch, a grazing jab, or a falling off balance open handed hook(not even legal)

there are entire videos showing this on youtube but i guess you would rather take a still frame and pretend thats what happened. the less evidence the better right? who needs to see everything when you have a picture! a picture and a fanataical attitude will take you far.even after seeing the truth you would just dismiss it and pretend floyds open handed fly swat was worth more.

[Stokely]

CLUELESS

Yes. CLUELESS. Like I've already explained, you've already exposed yourself of someone who lacks boxing knowledge in both amateur boxing and professional boxing. You use confirmation bias and dig up bias sources like that video you just linked to support your argument. One evidence of this is that you cite Lederman's scorecard and the compubox numbers for the Mayweather-Castillo fight but you deny them when it comes to the Mayweather-Pacquiao fight. You are a lying, duplicitous, CLUELESS, twig.

[Spoon23]

Thoughts on this?

http://theboxingbulletin.blogspot.co...r-vs-jose.html

I'm going to have to disagree with their scored card, their official one says that Castillo won round 4 and they had round 5 a draw, two rounds that Floyd easily won.

CLUELESS

[daggum]

You most certainly are clueless. Don't know how amateur boxing is scored, don't know how professional boxing is scored, use bias/skewed highlight videos as evidence to support your hilariously weak arguments. Use Lederman and compubox for one fight, deny Lederman and Compubox when they have Mayweather beating Pacquaio LOL! You're an inconsistent, disingenuous, clueless pac tard.

you score punches with an open glove as legal even though in the rules it clearly says they are not allowed so save it. those "hooks" that floyd was landing(with no force) were not legal. weakly fly swatting your opponent with an open glove is considered domination by you as i saw in the other thread. exposed yourself as a fanboy who doesn't even know the rules

[Spoon23]

Y

You do know the ref ruled that a slip right?

CLUELESS

[Stokely]

he landed far better punches than floyd so not sure what you are talking about and thats how you score a boxing match. not based on what you think someone should do but based on what actually was done. volume doenst matter. what matters is clean punching and that was pacs by far.

it was floyd who struggled to land clean flush punches with pac evading/blocking the vast majority of floyds work. posting one or two pics doesn't tell a story of 36 minutes. who landed the better punches in round 3,4, and 6-10? i can tell you it wasnt floyd. were a couple of those rounds close? sure but in a close round the guy landing the hard shots, the shots with leverage behind them, the shots that made a more visable and harder impact should get the round since those punches are by definition cleaner than an arm punch, a grazing jab, or a falling off balance open handed hook(not even legal)

there are entire videos showing this on youtube but i guess you would rather take a still frame and pretend thats what happened. the less evidence the better right? who needs to see everything when you have a picture! a picture and a fanataical attitude will take you far.even after seeing the truth you would just dismiss it and pretend floyds open handed fly swat was worth more.

The reality is that Floyd landed the better, cleaner, harder punches. It was Manny who struggled to land anything significant outside of the fourth round. Floyd easily won rounds 1-3, round 5, rounds 7-9 and rounds 11-12. 9-3 victory, 117-110 for Floyd. 10-8 round in round one since Pacquaio did absolutely nothing.

And no one cares about your fan-made, pac tard bias videos. Anyone who watches the full fight knows Pacquiao lost.

[Stokely]

You do know the ref ruled that a slip right?

CLUELESS

Too bad the ref didn't rule this one a slip.

[True-Boxing-Fan]

You’re a bîtch and probably some fat fûck who never laced up a pair of boxing gloves. YDKSAB

^^^^^lol lol lol lol lol lol^^^^^^^^

We have a supposed boxer in the forum^^^^^ lol lol lol lol

Little kid, take a seat at the breakfast table your mommy is calling you to eat before school.

[GhostofDempsey]

Delusional hater talk. Floyd outboxed all three of them, the only people who think it’s a robbery are you dirty Hispanics, you guys don’t know shît about boxing or how to score a fight.

Delusional fanboy talk. You're a troll/alt, probably Kigali or one of the other worthless casuals on this site. Keep it moving casual.