Mayweather-Castillo 1 was NOT a robbery

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • delukard
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Dec 2011
    • 46
    • 3
    • 0
    • 6,842

    #111
    without those boxers.

    you would have the track fielders like lara and co. boring the hell out of everyone.

    fore every exiting boxer like leonard,haggler, whitaker,the hitman, tyson, ali, etc. there would be hundreds of boring laras.

    sorry but boxing would be dead.

    Comment

    • Boxing Goat
      The G.O.A.T.
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2013
      • 13150
      • 557
      • 1,027
      • 128,865

      #112
      Originally posted by Stokely
      I think of HISPANICS you dumb fûck. Do you actually believe those idiots who think coming forward and throwing sloppy punches automatically gets the win, know how to score a fight?

      Those guys are a big bag of idiots that someone dropped into boxing and spoiled the boxing fan base.
      Ok, so where are hispanics from? And what race are hispanics?

      Comment

      • Boxing_1013
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2019
        • 6845
        • 184
        • 256
        • 157,917

        #113
        Originally posted by paulf
        Close fight but Mayweather won.

        If Floyd lost a fight, it was definitely Mayweather-Maidana I. I've watched it twice and can't score it for Floyd, Maidana won that one IMO.
        That's the one I am always wondering about...curiously it is one of the few Floyd fights that I can't find online...I had Castillo-Floyd as a legit 7-5 either way fight, with the slight edge to Floyd, for the record

        Comment

        • 4truth
          U can't handle the Truth
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Feb 2016
          • 15276
          • 4,152
          • 1,672
          • 197,686

          #114
          It was a fight that by every scoring criteria used in boxing should have gone to Castillo, use whatever word you want to describe the decision giving Floyd the win.

          If you don't like robbery, say questionable decision. I like to say to say robbery because I believe the scoring was biased and that the rightful winner was wrongfully deprived of victory, i.e, robbed of victory.

          Comment

          • QueensburyRules
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2018
            • 22569
            • 2,475
            • 18
            • 187,708

            #115
            Originally posted by Stokely
            I went and watched the fight a third time and I still can’t see how anyone could argue that this was a robbery. I saw Mayweather build an early lead by sweeping the first five rounds, then winning rounds 8 and 10. 7-5 win for Floyd.

            My scorecard
            RD1: 10-9
            RD2: 10-9
            RD3: 10-9
            RD4: 10-9
            RD5: 10-9
            RD6: 9-10
            RD7: 9-10
            RD8: 10-8
            RD9: 9-10
            RD10: 9-9
            RD11: 9-10
            RD12: 9-10
            114-112 Floyd Mayweather

            I think the confusion lies in round 10. A lot of fans think that just because Floyd got a point deducted in that round then it should automatically be scored 10-8 in favor of Castillo, when in reality that was a round Floyd clearly dominated and is objectively a 9-9 round by the boxing rules.
            - -You confuso?

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP