Comments Thread For: Danny Garcia: I'm Ready Fight To Pacquiao; Great Match For Me

[BxDreamz]

Nope

Bad fight for Danny. A good friend for Danny is jessie Vargas or dude that got rod against porter dam i forgot his name

[Theosis26]

I'm thinking Danny Garcia too tough for pac s next fight. Pac should be allowed easy touch once in a while.
Lucas, broner, thurman all names that people know.
Can Pac fight a name nobody knows for once like fury is doing.

How about no?

[The Big Dunn]

What I'm saying in a nutshell is can't the trio get their act together fight each other, or beat the crap out of each other to see who is the best then let Pac fight the winner.? Does that sound unreasonable to you?
Floyd liked do that let his peers beat up on each other and get glory fighting winner. Floyd always liked it easy. Now Pac s 41 can't he have a little luxury considering he's beat thurman already, something spence or crawford can't boast whilst sitting on imaginary throne with gold crown on with red pearl ***els.
It's unrealistic and asking too much of Pac to fight and beat them all. You know it is

No. Doing what is best for the division is the right thing to do. Doing what is easiest for Manny is not part of the equation.

Porter/Spence are fighting next. Manny should fight the winner after given the network politics. In a perfect world, we'd have a semi final matchup of Porter/Spence and Manny/Crawford with the winners fighting.

Floyd has nothing to do with this discussion.

In order to unify the division, any of the ww's should have to beat 2 of the other titleholders. No one is asking Manny to beat them all so there is no need for you to lie.

I gave 2 scenarios. In one, Manny fight the winner of Porter/Spence, without fighting anyone before, and then the winner fights Crawford. In the other he fights Crawford because Manny is seen as the #3 ww and Crawford #2 and the winner fights the winner of Spence (#1)/Porter (#4).

[hugh grant]

So you really saying Pac has to fight them all. I can't remember Floyd ever doing that, especially in such hot division. I certainly don't recall Floyd fans ever asking Floyd to do what's best for division. Usually it was what was best for his bank balance or health or what was best way to keep zero.
That's why Floyd fans supported berto, Connor and tenshin fights isn't it?

[sparda77]

Danny gets picked apart by Manny. Danny G is too slow. I can see Manny doing the in and out on Danny all night.

[MeanestNiceGuy]

JUst an easy touch nobody knows name of. Because even when Pac fights names, people call them bums. Brandon Rios was a bum?. Margarito was a bum?. Broners a bum?. Lucas Mattyeas a bum? Thurmans a bum?
So if Pac is going to fight a bum, let them really be a bum.

Ha! I see what you mean. I wouldn't mind seeing him face somebody in his country, then coming back here to the US to make a big fight before he calls it a day.

I can't stand Khan, but I wouldn't mind seeing him face Manny in Manila.

[The Big Dunn]

So you really saying Pac has to fight them all. I can't remember Floyd ever doing that, especially in such hot division. I certainly don't recall Floyd fans ever asking Floyd to do what's best for division. Usually it was what was best for his bank balance or health or what was best way to keep zero.

Why do you keep bringing up Floyd? He has nothing to do with this. Also why do you keep lying about Manny having to fight them all. He would only have to fight 2 of the other 3 belt holders, same as everyone else.

I didn't ask Manny to do what was best for the division. I posted a scenario where the 4 top ww's fight each other that gives us an undisputed lineal champ because that is what is best for the division and the sport as a whole.

You are lying again. Floyd fought everyone you asked he fight. He defeated them all. When he did, you went back and deleted the post where you stated he needed to beat these men to be an ATG.

Floyd did what you asked so I see no reason why Manny couldn't fight Crawford next, other than politics and the fact he has a history of turning down fights against men that are better than him.

[Pennstate110]

Why do you keep bringing up Floyd? He has nothing to do with this. Also why do you keep lying about Manny having to fight them all. He would only have to fight 2 of the other 3 belt holders, same as everyone else.

I didn't ask Manny to do what was best for the division. I posted a scenario where the 4 top ww's fight each other that gives us an undisputed lineal champ because that is what is best for the division and the sport as a whole.

You are lying again. Floyd fought everyone you asked he fight. He defeated them all. When he did, you went back and deleted the post where you stated he needed to beat these men to be an ATG.

Floyd did what you asked so I see no reason why Manny couldn't fight Crawford next, other than politics and the fact he has a history of turning down fights against men that are better than him.

Really, didn't Floyd fight Berto instead of Thurman????

[The Big Dunn]

and when manny beat spence and crawford. it will be because those guys are unproven, etc. or manny waited until he saw that crawford or spence wasnt the same fighter anymore before fighting them, etc. this is a repeat pattern when it comes to manny and the haters.

How is he going to beat them if he doesn't fight them?

As for the criticism of Thurman being not at his best or looking bad in the fight before, you say this about any number of opponents that other people have fought. Why are you upset that people are saying the same thing about Thurman as you have said in the past?

You and hugh grant create these crazy theories and standards then get mad when other posters apply them to Manny. Why?

[The Big Dunn]

Really, didn't Floyd fight Berto instead of Thurman????

No, he didn't fight Berto instead of Thurman. He fought Manny then he fought Berto.

What is your issue with that?