Not a bad idea...makes more sense now than him losing to one of the top names and THEN going for an easy touch afterwards.
Who would you suggest?
JUst an easy touch nobody knows name of. Because even when Pac fights names, people call them bums. Brandon Rios was a bum?. Margarito was a bum?. Broners a bum?. Lucas Mattyeas a bum? Thurmans a bum?
So if Pac is going to fight a bum, let them really be a bum.
This does seem rather unfair on Pac, so Pac eventually has to fight all the supposedly best WWs, in SPence, Crawford and Thurman? Pac beats Thurmans, then people say spence is the best? Pac then beats Spence then people say Crawford is the best?
Pacs got to beat all of them before people decide who really was the best out of Thurman, Crawford and SPence? Its like somebody don't want Pac to be considered the best WW and are putting imaginery barriers up for Pac
Hasn't Pac earnt any priviledges after having proved himself all these years? FLoyd earnt the right to fight Berto somehow?
I am a boxing fan looking at the division and what is best for the sport. I am not looking at what is best for each individual ww.
No one is moving the goalposts on Manny. No need for you to lie about that. Spence is the top ww, Crawford 2nd. Thurman was seen as 3rd because he was out so long on injury. Then it was Manny and Porter.
Pac fought Thurman because Manny was the interim WBA champ and Thurman was the full champ returning from an injury. Now he is the full WBA champ.
In any other division, having the the #1 and #4 fight and the #2 and #3 fight would be acceptable for any boxing fan. You don't wan this because you are not a boxing fan but a Manny fan looking for the easiest way possible for Manny. You clearly think Manny would lose to either Crawford or Spence.
Earnt isn't a word. Floyd fighting Berto does not factor into the discussion about Garcia/Manny.
Manny has earned the right to fight whom he chooses. That stated, what I mapped out in my post is what is best for the division and the sport.
it only works like that in the unpopular divisions such as CW, SM and the petite divisions.
It can work like that in any division. The only time it doesn't work like this is if one of the fighters has the ability to earn big bucks by not taking on the best competition.
This does seem rather unfair on Pac, so Pac eventually has to fight all the supposedly best WWs, in SPence, Crawford and Thurman? Pac beats Thurmans, then people say spence is the best? Pac then beats Spence then people say Crawford is the best?
Pacs got to beat all of them before people decide who really was the best out of Thurman, Crawford and SPence? Its like somebody don't want Pac to be considered the best WW and are putting imaginery barriers up for Pac
Hasn't Pac earnt any priviledges after having proved himself all these years? FLoyd earnt the right to fight Berto somehow and Floyd fans get offended when people say Floyd ducked thurman?
and when manny beat spence and crawford. it will be because those guys are unproven, etc. or manny waited until he saw that crawford or spence wasnt the same fighter anymore before fighting them, etc. this is a repeat pattern when it comes to manny and the haters.
I am a boxing fan looking at the division and what is best for the sport. I am not looking at what is best for each individual ww.
No one is moving the goalposts on Manny. No need for you to lie about that. Spence is the top ww, Crawford 2nd. Thurman was seen as 3rd because he was out so long on injury. Then it was Manny and Porter.
Pac fought Thurman because Manny was the interim WBA champ and Thurman was the full champ returning from an injury. Now he is the full WBA champ.
In any other division, having the the #1 and #4 fight and the #2 and #3 fight would be acceptable for any boxing fan. You don't wan this because you are not a boxing fan but a Manny fan looking for the easiest way possible for Manny. You clearly think Manny would lose to either Crawford or Spence.
Earnt isn't a word. Floyd fighting Berto does not factor into the discussion about Garcia/Manny.
Manny has earned the right to fight whom he chooses. That stated, what I mapped out in my post is what is best for the division and the sport.
What I'm saying in a nutshell is can't the trio get their act together fight each other, or beat the crap out of each other to see who is the best then let Pac fight the winner.? Does that sound unreasonable to you?
Floyd liked do that let his peers beat up on each other and get glory fighting winner. Floyd always liked it easy. Now Pac s 41 can't he have a little luxury considering he's beat thurman already, something spence or crawford can't boast whilst sitting on imaginary throne with gold crown on with red pearl ***els.
It's unrealistic and asking too much of Pac to fight and beat them all. You know it is
and when manny beat spence and crawford. it will be because those guys are unproven, etc. or manny waited until he saw that crawford or spence wasnt the same fighter anymore before fighting them, etc. this is a repeat pattern when it comes to manny and the haters.
Yes it's a pattern of behaviour Pac s critics indulge in.
Is it asking too much for the young lions to beat each other up to decide who is best. Then Pac simply fights the best. If thurman really is the best out of young lions then that's great for pac. Pac don't need to fight him again as he's beat his butt already
Danny wasn't dismissive of the fight against Pac. They just said that they wouldn't be lining up like everybody else when they realistically had a small chance for the match up.
Some saying here that it is not a good match but Pac has fought Broner, Rios, Matthysse and Algieri that were trash fights from the go.
At least Danny is a proven WW that loses competitive fights and has that chin.
Comment