Comments Thread For: Trainer: GGG Hasn't Lost a Step, He's Fighting Better Fighters
Collapse
-
Comment
-
A good fighter like Golovkin would beat a fighter like Rolls any time. But the things needed to perform at a high level, Golovkin definitely has lost some of that. He doesn't move the same or have the same snap in his punches that he used to. He's still good enough to make fights competitive and win them but he's not the same fighter he was, competition or not.Comment
-
You're right , I also forgot to mention Golovkin picked the judges & the referee + he picked when the fight was gonna start. No national anthems , cause he's gonna come out gun's blazing , firing on all cylinders they said. Only to get dominated in the entire first half of the fight by CANELO, again.Comment
-
What he is saying is quite valid. Not sure who could argue against the fact that
GGG was steam rolling bums.
As soon as live experienced bodies show up GGG is fighting tooth and nail.
What’s even worst is the boxing writers insulted our intelligence creating the old fighter sound byte as soon as he was in real fights. GGG is good fighter but no where near the monster we were lead to believe.
exactly !Comment
-
Well I think GGG needs due credit for stopping the likes of former unified WBA/IBF champion Daniel Geale & former IBF champion David Lemieux. Of course people that throw out the term 'bum' or 'cans' for a fighter have never laced up gloves let alone come out from behind their keyboard so who gives a f***. At the end of the day GGG has nearly fought every credible name at 160, Golovkin's resume is actually impressive but haters gonna hate. People were actually accusing G of ducking Derevyanchenko so at least this fight shuts up a few more critics. Let's see how he goes in his next fight.Comment
-
There's no such thing as 37 year old middleweight who "hasn't lost a step".
Even Bernard Hopkins wasn't the same athlete at 37 as he was when he was younger.
He was better, smarter, but as an athlete, biology is what it is, which is why you don't see 37 year olds winning the 100-yd dash in the Olympics, or winning the long jump.Comment
-
Of course it was a KO. But assuming we're going off facial damage, looking at Golovkin's face, it was competitive up until the stoppage, no? People who use Golovkin's face as an indication of him losing to Canelo, really need to watch the fight over again because if they're implying dominance, that's definitely not what happened.Comment
-
Comment
Comment