Originally posted by AKAcronym
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Trainer: GGG Hasn't Lost a Step, He's Fighting Better Fighters
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostWhat's your point? How does Canelo actions relate to GGG? Bottom line...GGG steam rolled Rolls but not Canelo and Jacobs though younger. Sound logic that items moreso his competition than his age.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AKAcronym View PostYou do know that Alvarez has half an inch reach advantage right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fire4231 View PostWhat he is saying is quite valid. Not sure who could argue against the fact that
GGG was steam rolling bums.
As soon as live experienced bodies show up GGG is fighting tooth and nail.
What’s even worst is the boxing writers insulted our intelligence creating the old fighter sound byte as soon as he was in real fights. GGG is good fighter but no where near the monster we were lead to believe.
exactly !
Comment
-
Well I think GGG needs due credit for stopping the likes of former unified WBA/IBF champion Daniel Geale & former IBF champion David Lemieux. Of course people that throw out the term 'bum' or 'cans' for a fighter have never laced up gloves let alone come out from behind their keyboard so who gives a f***. At the end of the day GGG has nearly fought every credible name at 160, Golovkin's resume is actually impressive but haters gonna hate. People were actually accusing G of ducking Derevyanchenko so at least this fight shuts up a few more critics. Let's see how he goes in his next fight.
Comment
-
There's no such thing as 37 year old middleweight who "hasn't lost a step".
Even Bernard Hopkins wasn't the same athlete at 37 as he was when he was younger.
He was better, smarter, but as an athlete, biology is what it is, which is why you don't see 37 year olds winning the 100-yd dash in the Olympics, or winning the long jump.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AKAcronym View PostOf course it was a KO. But assuming we're going off facial damage, looking at Golovkin's face, it was competitive up until the stoppage, no? People who use Golovkin's face as an indication of him losing to Canelo, really need to watch the fight over again because if they're implying dominance, that's definitely not what happened.
Comment
-
Comment