Sorry, huh? How does Kovalev walk Saunders down? His style is pretty much impervious to that unless his tank runs dry or he gets caught with something big when he tries to pounce in and pop off and gets stunned into a shambling, retreating husk. And Kovalev, like Canelo or Golovkin, certainly has the artillery to do just that with the right shot, but otherwise Saunders deals with him in the same way as the other two - by doing his usual dance and killing them on points. The obvious distinction from a Lemieux or Isufi being they have the means to catch him in the smallest misstep and either take him out or change the whole momentum of the fight in an instant, to the point of making it highly competitive.
Stop it is right. I don't know where this delusion that Saunders at 168 turns into a cream soda on legs got traction, but it's ****ing ******. You accuse this guy of not having watched the Isufi fight, then go on to appraise it as if you didn't see it yourself. "On his bicycle hurt"? You say this as though there was even one sustained passage of effective retaliation from Isufi, when you've simply cherry picked the literal 20 seconds of the night that didn't go Saunders way (10 seconds into rd 6, to be exact) in what was otherwise a one-sided thrashing every bit as severe as Lemieux's. Aside from that moment, Isufi had zip, nada.
And sure, that one slip up is one more than we saw against Lemieux, but it was otherwise Lemieux Pt II, and if he didn't look every bit as fresh as then, he was 95% there. Both the Isufi highlights and full Lemieux fight are right there on youtube. I don't see how anyone without a weird agenda watches the two back back to back and concludes with a straight face the former constitutes some huge drop off from the latter. If you're one of the legion that can't stand BJS as a person then fair play, but don't let it lead you into saying basically patently false **** about his current condition or viability as a contender.
Stop it is right. I don't know where this delusion that Saunders at 168 turns into a cream soda on legs got traction, but it's ****ing ******. You accuse this guy of not having watched the Isufi fight, then go on to appraise it as if you didn't see it yourself. "On his bicycle hurt"? You say this as though there was even one sustained passage of effective retaliation from Isufi, when you've simply cherry picked the literal 20 seconds of the night that didn't go Saunders way (10 seconds into rd 6, to be exact) in what was otherwise a one-sided thrashing every bit as severe as Lemieux's. Aside from that moment, Isufi had zip, nada.
And sure, that one slip up is one more than we saw against Lemieux, but it was otherwise Lemieux Pt II, and if he didn't look every bit as fresh as then, he was 95% there. Both the Isufi highlights and full Lemieux fight are right there on youtube. I don't see how anyone without a weird agenda watches the two back back to back and concludes with a straight face the former constitutes some huge drop off from the latter. If you're one of the legion that can't stand BJS as a person then fair play, but don't let it lead you into saying basically patently false **** about his current condition or viability as a contender.
Comment