Andy Ruiz will win if it goes to court

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boxingraya
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2019
    • 1249
    • 47
    • 10
    • 49,823

    #21
    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
    He got a 50% increase on his first fight purse. I don't know why you're concentrating on money either, he's also demanding where the fight will go after signing that Joshua has the right. Fighters will be less willing to take risky voluntaries because of BS like this. Ruiz and Haymon are damaging the sport. You aren't a boxing fan if you defend their BS, you simply can't be.
    The 100 mill offer changed everything. Saudi Arabia changes everything.

    Comment

    • Robbie Barrett
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 40891
      • 2,779
      • 667
      • 570,921

      #22
      Originally posted by Gpabrooklyn
      Like I said judges rule against legally binding contracts all the time in America,I know your not talking about low iq when you compared a boxing contract to buying a house,can't get much dumber then that
      I was comparing your reasoning. You think Ruiz can get out of it because the value has changed, then people should be able to get out of mortgages if the value changes. Same logic. Same outcome. It won't happen. Fighters would be doing it all the time if that was the case, want to name some fighters that have?

      Comment

      • Boxingraya
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2019
        • 1249
        • 47
        • 10
        • 49,823

        #23
        Originally posted by REDEEMER
        That's fantasy land. Any Ruiz win would have bumped the fight bigger, he knew a win would result in the split he agreed to to get the fight in the first place . The fights going to happen in the scheduled fight ,AJ will win and then we move on.
        No, because not every win pumps up your value equally. Had Ruiz won on some BS dq or bad decision, the demand for the rematch would be different.

        Comment

        • Alan Smithee
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2018
          • 2353
          • 280
          • 133
          • 56,492

          #24
          Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
          Then it will be in the UK. Saudi Arabia was only brought up because fat andy was crying about the UK. He's not getting out of it.
          Does it really matter where the fight takes place? What Can Joshua do to change the outcome? Weak chins stay weak!

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #25
            Originally posted by Boxingraya
            The 100 mill offer changed everything. Saudi Arabia changes everything.
            It changes nothing. Ruiz has a contract he has to honour.

            Comment

            • Gpabrooklyn
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Oct 2017
              • 167
              • 20
              • 1
              • 13,715

              #26
              Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
              I was comparing your reasoning. You think Ruiz can get out of it because the value has changed, then people should be able to get out of mortgages if the value changes. Same logic. Same outcome. It won't happen. Fighters would be doing it all the time if that was the case, want to name some fighters that have?
              Even comparing the logic is dumb,one is an object you own,the other is a agreement between two people,and agreement's change everyday,fighters don't usually go to court because they don't have promoters like hearn trying to bully them into set amounts while he makes all the money,hearn is trying to be the new don king,he tried to con Wilder now he's trying to con Ruiz,we not having it over here in America,trust haymon and his lawyers got they case ready if he wanna take it to court

              Comment

              • Robbie Barrett
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2013
                • 40891
                • 2,779
                • 667
                • 570,921

                #27
                Originally posted by Gpabrooklyn
                Even comparing the logic is dumb,one is an object you own,the other is a agreement between two people,and agreement's change everyday,fighters don't usually go to court because they don't have promoters like hearn trying to bully them into set amounts while he makes all the money,hearn is trying to be the new don king,he tried to con Wilder now he's trying to con Ruiz,we not having it over here in America,trust haymon and his lawyers got they case ready if he wanna take it to court
                Every rematch clause has the purses laid out. Fighters could get out of rematches by refusing to accept the purse if not. You know nothing about what you're discussing.

                Comment

                • Gpabrooklyn
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Oct 2017
                  • 167
                  • 20
                  • 1
                  • 13,715

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                  Every rematch clause has the purses laid out. Fighters could get out of rematches by refusing to accept the purse if not. You know nothing about what you're discussing.
                  No you don't know what your talking about,every rematch clause don't have fixed purses,only the crooks like hearn do that,I bet you never even seen a boxing contract a day in your life

                  Comment

                  • Robbie Barrett
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2013
                    • 40891
                    • 2,779
                    • 667
                    • 570,921

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Gpabrooklyn
                    No you don't know what your talking about,every rematch clause don't have fixed purses,only the crooks like hearn do that,I bet you never even seen a boxing contract a day in your life
                    The vast majority of boxing contracts have fixed purses. Only very few have percentages. Again you know nothing.

                    Comment

                    • Randall Cunning
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Oct 2015
                      • 6041
                      • 163
                      • 30
                      • 84,599

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Gpabrooklyn
                      Even comparing the logic is dumb,one is an object you own,the other is a agreement between two people,and agreement's change everyday,fighters don't usually go to court because they don't have promoters like hearn trying to bully them into set amounts while he makes all the money,hearn is trying to be the new don king,he tried to con Wilder now he's trying to con Ruiz,we not having it over here in America,trust haymon and his lawyers got they case ready if he wanna take it to court
                      Haymon already negotiated the terms of the rematch clause. If the terms are bad Ruiz should be holding Haymon accountable. Matchroom are only following what was agreed with Ruiz/PBC

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP