Canelo ducked SD and GGG isn’t

[Nehnenqui]

Give it up f4ggot. You’ve been pushing this s**t about Borat for months. Nobody blamed Borat for fighting GODnelo, they clowned Borat for fighting Vanes instead of Derevyanchenko, lmao.

Semi-retired 154 Vanes, lmao.

Just like Borat probably could’ve fought Andrade but instead chose to fight Rolls, LMAO!

[boliodogs]

People think GGG was stripped for fighting Vanes, when like you said, he was actually stripped for fighting Canelo. If he had fought Derev after Vanes, he would've kept the belt. Right on cue, the tune changes with these guys.

Who in the hell would pass up a 45 million dollar payday to fight Canelo to instead fight Dervy for maybe 3 million to keep a belt????? It's prize fighting not throw 42 million bucks away fighting. Canelo in contrast, could get at least 25 million to fight Dervy now without it costing any other big fight. He chose not to fight him and just hand over his belt without a fight. Put whatever spin you want on it but that is the truth.

[Robbie Barrett]

Who in the hell would pass up a 45 million dollar payday to fight Canelo to instead fight Dervy for maybe 3 million to keep a belt????? It's prize fighting not throw 42 million bucks away fighting. Canelo in contrast, could get at least 25 million to fight Dervy now without it costing any other big fight. He chose not to fight him and just hand over his belt without a fight. Put whatever spin you want on it but that is the truth.

You're doing the spinning. Golovkin was mandated to fight Dev, he chose Vanes instead. He applied for an exemption which was denied because he wouldn't agree to fight Vanes next.

He was stripped for fighting Vanes instead of Dev.

[MastaBlasta]

"the IBF had to enforce the penalty under Rule 5H for Golovkin having participated in an unsanctioned contest within his weight class and declare the IBF Middleweight title vacant."

https://www.boxingscene.com/ibf-explains-its-decision-strip-gennady-golovkin-title--128841

Who's lying? IBF clearly said he was stripped for fighting an unsanctioned contest against Vanes.

Details matter Robbie. From your same article:

"On April 27, 2018, the majority of the IBF Board of Directors determined that the Exception to Regulations should be granted to Gennady Golovkin with the following conditions:

The Gennady Golovkin vs. Vanes Martirosyan bout must take place on or before May 5, 2018.

2. Golovkin must agree in writing that he will fight the IBF Middleweight Mandatory within 90 days of the May 5, 2018, bout or by Friday, August 3, 2018.

Golovkin shall agree in writing to indemnify, hold harmless and otherwise reimburse the IBF for any legal fees or other expenses related to the granting of said Exception, including, but not limited to, the costs attendant to any resultant litigation. (As required under IBF Rule 11.F.)

On April 30, 2018, counsel for Golovkin filed an appeal objecting to condition #2 in the Board’s decision. Counsel for Derevyanchenko, the IBF Mandatory, filed a response to the appeal on May 7, 2018.

The IBF proceeded and assembled a panel of three IBF members, who are also practicing attorneys, to review the written submissions and hear the oral arguments of counsel for the parties on May 22, 2018, at the Robert Treat Hotel in Newark, NJ. The panel made its recommendations to the IBF and based on their findings and recommendations, the IBF approved the condition that Golovkin agree to fight the IBF Middleweight mandatory opponent by August 3, 2018 in order to avoid the penalty of losing his title under IBF Rule 5.H.

Since Golovkin has not agreed in writing to fight the IBF Mandatory opponent by August 3, 2018, a required condition for the grant of the Exception, the request for an Exception to Rule 5.H. was denied in accordance to rule Rule 11.I, “Compliance with Terms of Exception” provides, “The Champion must comply with all conditions contained in the grant of an exception.” Therefore, the IBF denied the request for an Exception with the condition removed."

So, they were granting the Vanes exemption. The reason they stripped was because GGG INTENDED to fight Nelo after Vanes, and not comply with fighting Dervy immediately AFTER vanes. Technically they turned down the Vanes exemption BUT THEY EXPLAINED that they had APPROVED it as long as GGG agreed in writing to fight Dervy AFTER Vanes (instead of Nelo).

In a nutshell, with the crazy circumstances behind Clenelo's bad test, they were willing to allow Vanes. Period.

[Robbie Barrett]

Details matter Robbie. From your same article:

"On April 27, 2018, the majority of the IBF Board of Directors determined that the Exception to Regulations should be granted to Gennady Golovkin with the following conditions:

The Gennady Golovkin vs. Vanes Martirosyan bout must take place on or before May 5, 2018.

2. Golovkin must agree in writing that he will fight the IBF Middleweight Mandatory within 90 days of the May 5, 2018, bout or by Friday, August 3, 2018.

Golovkin shall agree in writing to indemnify, hold harmless and otherwise reimburse the IBF for any legal fees or other expenses related to the granting of said Exception, including, but not limited to, the costs attendant to any resultant litigation. (As required under IBF Rule 11.F.)

On April 30, 2018, counsel for Golovkin filed an appeal objecting to condition #2 in the Board’s decision. Counsel for Derevyanchenko, the IBF Mandatory, filed a response to the appeal on May 7, 2018.

The IBF proceeded and assembled a panel of three IBF members, who are also practicing attorneys, to review the written submissions and hear the oral arguments of counsel for the parties on May 22, 2018, at the Robert Treat Hotel in Newark, NJ. The panel made its recommendations to the IBF and based on their findings and recommendations, the IBF approved the condition that Golovkin agree to fight the IBF Middleweight mandatory opponent by August 3, 2018 in order to avoid the penalty of losing his title under IBF Rule 5.H.

Since Golovkin has not agreed in writing to fight the IBF Mandatory opponent by August 3, 2018, a required condition for the grant of the Exception, the request for an Exception to Rule 5.H. was denied in accordance to rule Rule 11.I, “Compliance with Terms of Exception” provides, “The Champion must comply with all conditions contained in the grant of an exception.” Therefore, the IBF denied the request for an Exception with the condition removed."

So, they were granting the Vanes exemption. The reason they stripped was because GGG INTENDED to fight Nelo after Vanes, and not comply with fighting Dervy immediately AFTER vanes. Technically they turned down the Vanes exemption BUT THEY EXPLAINED that they had APPROVED it as long as GGG agreed in writing to fight Dervy AFTER Vanes (instead of Nelo).

In a nutshell, with the crazy circumstances behind Clenelo's bad test, they were willing to allow Vanes. Period.

Fighting Vanes instead of Dev was against the rules. They were willing to give an exemption if he agreed to fight Dev straight after. HE WAS STRIPPED FOR FIGHTING VANES - Fact

Try and spin it all you like, you can't change the fact.

[MastaBlasta]

Fighting Vanes instead of Dev was against the rules. They were willing to give an exemption if he agreed to fight Dev straight after. HE WAS STRIPPED FOR FIGHTING VANES - Fact

Try and spin it all you like, you can't change the fact.

No spin, the IBF spelled it out. They stripped GGG "for not agreeing to the exemption (i.e. signing in writing that he would fight Dervy AFTER the Vanes fight)". They had no problem with the Vanes fight. They weren't willing to allow the Nelo fight after Vanes.

[Robbie Barrett]

No spin, the IBF spelled it out. They stripped GGG "for not agreeing to the exemption (i.e. signing in writing that he would fight Dervy AFTER the Vanes fight)". They had no problem with the Vanes fight. They weren't willing to allow the Nelo fight after Vanes.

The IBF did spell it out. They said he was stripped for fighting an "unsanctioned contest" against Vanes

"The penalty for Golovkin having participated in an unsanctioned contest within his weight class under Rule 5.H. is that his IBF middleweight title will be declared vacant"

https://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/story/_/id/23717646/ibf-strips-gennady-golovkin-failing-fight-challenger

[BigStomps]

Canelo fans are welcome to eat crow and to STFU

You gotta be one ****** dumb motherfuccer to think all this isn't planned! Think about it you dumb fucc!
Right after they announced Canelo is getting stripped they also announce that Sergey is close to a deal to fight Triple g for the IBF belt. At the same time they announce that Canelo is close to a unification fight with Andrade,...
What does that tell you?? That they've been negotiating all this for at least a week and it's a 4 man tournament.
Triple g was too much of a biitch like you to fight Andrade so Canelo told Triple g he'll take the toughest opponent which is Andrade while Triple g can take the easier out of Sergey and Andrade which is Sergey...
Canelo Daring to be great and he's going after the big dogs!
If Canelo beats Andrade then you can bet those two dollars you've got that he'll be unifying with the winner of Sergey and Triple g... FACTS!
So 🖕🖕😆

[R-Hand Southpaw]

The IBF did spell it out. They said he was stripped for fighting an "unsanctioned contest" against Vanes

"The penalty for Golovkin having participated in an unsanctioned contest within his weight class under Rule 5.H. is that his IBF middleweight title will be declared vacant"

https://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/story/...ght-challenger

Dude you really are ******. So ****** in fact that honestly you're a waste of my time. READ

"On April 27, 2018, the majority of the IBF Board of Directors determined that the Exception to Regulations should be granted to Gennady Golovkin with the following conditions:

The Gennady Golovkin vs. Vanes Martirosyan bout must take place on or before May 5, 2018.

2. Golovkin must agree in writing that he will fight the IBF Middleweight Mandatory within 90 days of the May 5, 2018, bout or by Friday, August 3, 2018.

The tl;dr version for you because you're too ****** to comprehend worda.

The IBF grants an exemption under two conditions

1. Vanes takes place on or before May 5th

And most important the second condition

2. GGG agree to fight Derevychanko by Aug 3rd.

In order to not be stripped both conditions had to be met. GGG fought vanes before May 5th which cleared the first condition to not be stripped but he did not clear the 2nd as he had no intention on fighting Derevychanko but Canelo.

He petitioned the second condition and lost.

What does that mean? The IBF stripped him for not agreeing to fight Derevychanko after Vanes.

Like holy ****. But no. You only quote **** that fits your agenda. Didnt even bother to post the full thing because it would contradict yourself

[Robbie Barrett]

Dude you really are ******. So ****** in fact that honestly you're a waste of my time. READ

"On April 27, 2018, the majority of the IBF Board of Directors determined that the Exception to Regulations should be granted to Gennady Golovkin with the following conditions:

The Gennady Golovkin vs. Vanes Martirosyan bout must take place on or before May 5, 2018.

2. Golovkin must agree in writing that he will fight the IBF Middleweight Mandatory within 90 days of the May 5, 2018, bout or by Friday, August 3, 2018.

The tl;dr version for you because you're too ****** to comprehend worda.

The IBF grants an exemption under two conditions

1. Vanes takes place on or before May 5th

And most important the second condition

2. GGG agree to fight Derevychanko by Aug 3rd.

In order to not be stripped both conditions had to be met. GGG fought vanes before May 5th which cleared the first condition to not be stripped but he did not clear the 2nd as he had no intention on fighting Derevychanko but Canelo.

He petitioned the second condition and lost.

What does that mean? The IBF stripped him for not agreeing to fight Derevychanko after Vanes.

Like holy ****. But no. You only quote **** that fits your agenda. Didnt even bother to post the full thing because it would contradict yourself

and........ they stripped him for fighting an unsanctioned contest against Vanes. That's the reason the IBF gave, why are you idiots arguing against what the IBF themselves said?