Hearn: BScene article was factually incorrect!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Biolink
    Donaire is #1
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 9926
    • 642
    • 2,205
    • 40,170

    #11
    I don't doubt that there were some inaccuracies. Hauser has legit sources, but he has a VERY bad habit of trying to inject his opinion into these facts/leaks.

    With that said obviously Hearn isn't going to say "Yup they were 100% correct Whyte was shooting up his arse".

    There's nothing to be said until more facts come out.

    Comment

    • 1hourRun
      SQUAD-UP!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2010
      • 20526
      • 2,789
      • 2,336
      • 140,312

      #12
      Originally posted by kafkod
      Hearn says that Anber and Yvon Michel were present when the gloves were inspected and passed as legal by the BBBoC and the WBC.

      He also says that Rivas was given the option to wear the same gloves himself but declined the offer. This was a WBC sanctioned fight and WBC officials were present to make sure everything complied with their rules.

      Are you going to tell me the WBC are in Hearn's pocket now?

      All this stuff coming from Rivas' team is nothing but sour g****s and them doing everything they can to get the result overturned. You can bet your life, if Rivas had won, there wouldn't be a peep from them about Whyte's gloves!
      You are still on about the gloves after what I said about plaster?! Its common knowledge that its the fighters team that catches plastered wraps or tampered gloves Kafkod. Billy Collins jr. and Shane Mosley come to mind.

      If Whyte was already gloved up and Rivas team was not allowed to inspect the gloves, then surely that means they were not even there to check the wraps, who knows what they could of done in the mean time.

      Comment

      • kafkod
        I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2013
        • 24746
        • 2,173
        • 1,787
        • 405,373

        #13
        Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
        You’re dismissing Rivas’ claim because the party involved in a cover up said the glove issue wasn’t an issue?

        LOL
        That's an illogical circular argument.


        Let's see if the WBC, Michel and Anber have anything to say about Hearn trying to cover up illegal glove tampering by lying about them, on record.

        Comment

        • ShaneMosleySr
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2019
          • 10325
          • 1,049
          • 903
          • 276,311

          #14
          It’s illogical to believe a trainer who said he didn’t get to inspect the gloves because someone covering up a failed drug test says the gloves were fine?

          Originally posted by kafkod
          That's an illogical circular argument.


          Let's see if the WBC, Michel and Anber have anything to say about Hearn trying to cover up illegal glove tampering by lying about them, on record.

          Comment

          • kafkod
            I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2013
            • 24746
            • 2,173
            • 1,787
            • 405,373

            #15
            Originally posted by 1hourRun
            You are still on about the gloves after what I said about plaster?! Its common knowledge that its the fighters team that catches plastered wraps or tampered gloves Kafkod. Billy Collins jr. and Shane Mosley come to mind.

            If Whyte was already gloved up and Rivas team was not allowed to inspect the gloves, then surely that means they were not even there to check the wraps, who knows what they could of done in the mean time.
            It was a WBC sanctioned fight, which meant WBC officials would have been present while Dillian was gloved up, and Rivas' team would have been able to do everything the WBC and BBBoC rules allow them to do regarding the gloves and wraps.

            Did they object to Dillian's gloves before Rivas got his ass kicked?

            Apparently not, so STFU and suck your sour g****s like a man.

            Comment

            • GGG Gloveking
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Apr 2016
              • 12382
              • 658
              • 193
              • 189,439

              #16
              Originally posted by kafkod
              It was a WBC sanctioned fight, which meant WBC officials would have been present while Dillian was gloved up, and Rivas' team would have been able to do everything the WBC and BBBoC rules allow them to do regarding the gloves and wraps.

              Did they object to Dillian's gloves before Rivas got his ass kicked?

              Apparently not, so STFU and suck your sour g****s like a man.
              Well, actually...

              Anber explains that their appeal was filed before the contest took place on Saturday night

              Russ Anber, a member of Oscar Rivas' corner and CEO of Rival Boxing, detailed the events that prompted to their team to file an appeal with the WBC, regarding t

              Comment

              • kafkod
                I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2013
                • 24746
                • 2,173
                • 1,787
                • 405,373

                #17
                Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
                It’s illogical to believe a trainer who said he didn’t get to inspect the gloves because someone covering up a failed drug test says the gloves were fine?
                Very illogical, because you are using something you have no evidence of and which is obviously not true as proof of something else you have no evidence of.

                Comment

                • 1hourRun
                  SQUAD-UP!
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 20526
                  • 2,789
                  • 2,336
                  • 140,312

                  #18
                  Originally posted by kafkod
                  It was a WBC sanctioned fight, which meant WBC officials would have been present while Dillian was gloved up, and Rivas' team would have been able to do everything the WBC and BBBoC rules allow them to do regarding the gloves and wraps.

                  Did they object to Dillian's gloves before Rivas got his ass kicked?

                  Apparently not, so STFU and suck your sour g****s like a man.
                  Originally posted by Russ Anber
                  "Well, it takes 90 seconds at most to put on or take off a pair of gloves. So why not allow us the courtesy of being able to see the gloves?

                  "All that happened was everything ended up being shrouded in controversy and didn’t look transparent.

                  "We filed our protest before we even went into the ring. And can you blame us? I mean, can you imagine if the boot was on the other foot – and such a situation occurred, say, for a British fighter fighting an American in America?
                  Yes they did object, in fact team Rivas filed a complaint right before the fight.

                  Comment

                  • 1hourRun
                    SQUAD-UP!
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 20526
                    • 2,789
                    • 2,336
                    • 140,312

                    #19
                    Originally posted by GGG Gloveking
                    Well, actually...

                    Anber explains that their appeal was filed before the contest took place on Saturday night

                    https://www.boxingscene.com/team-riv...-fight--141197
                    Kafkod is drunk.

                    Comment

                    • ShaneMosleySr
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Mar 2019
                      • 10325
                      • 1,049
                      • 903
                      • 276,311

                      #20
                      I have no evidence that Whyte failed a drug test and that he and Hearn didn’t tell anyone?

                      LOL

                      Originally posted by kafkod
                      Very illogical, because you are using something you have no evidence of and which is obviously not true as proof of something else you have no evidence of.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP