Hearn keeps saying Boxingscene is fake news

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Whytes A sample has not tested positive publicly by anyone but Hauser ? You f'ing dummy. lol

What this means is if the B sample is negative that means if Hauser is even right with an A sample has a defamation case against him for accusing someone for testing positive if the findings find Whyte innocent in the end .

Whyte had a hearing bf the fight ,this means something was found but its still defamation of character if Whyte is found innocent and the findings are related to a by product. Get it ,****** ? lol


In short if Whyte is found innocent hes screwed. Simple for a simpleton and was accused of wrong doing bc a guy from B scene wanted the attention first and broke the news.,and has an entire interview of what was in Whytes system but hes not accusing him????.lol


im sure you'll be wishing whyte is found guilty bc that's what losers do they wish bad on fighters .

The A sample has been confirmed by UKAD, Hearn etc you absolute imbecile. He had to attend a hearing about it you utter cretin.

You do realise to sue for libel or slander, the information provided must be false, none of the information Hauser provided is false.

Next time I want legal advice I’ll probably go to somebody who can spell Klitschko.

����“Klitchko” GTFOH you pathetic old man.

[REDEEMER]

Ah great ANOTHER law guy made up alt on here ,that's like 3 now of probably the same re,tard.


No you don't know a lot and you are WAYYYY to dumb to be a law anything .lol

I have that RJJ poster on ignore and only see his comments when he replies to you and now I remember why. Ha

And this circumstance is also a confidentiality breach juggs by Hauser. Man I hope whyte is innocent just to see what happens. Ha

[juggernaut666]

The A sample has been confirmed by UKAD, Hearn etc you absolute imbecile. He had to attend a hearing about it you utter cretin.

You do realise to sue for libel or slander, the information provided must be false, none of the information Hauser provided is false.

Next time I want legal advice I’ll probably go to somebody who can spell Klitschko.

����“Klitchko” GTFOH you pathetic old man.

Whytes A sample did not test positive publicly yet so no its all hearsay and just what may or may not be an issue on what was found.

In the event it does its still leaking out a undisclosed finding at that time Hauser decided to go with the story...that's called being liable putting out info on a confidentiality case without permission from the fighter and that's against the rules enforced by the UKAD's rules ,he didn't speculate ,he outright accused and informed the public he was guilty,do you see the difference you re.tard ? Mr. fake azz law kid . lol


Now go away DUMBIUM go lick Furys arm pits there dry.

[BoloShot]

Lol, he's copying Trump. When you resort to Trumpian tactics... you know yer gonna get impeached.

Still believe the Russia conspiracy? What a tool you are. The dude is innocent.

[juggernaut666]

I have that RJJ poster on ignore and only see his comments when he replies to you and now I remember why. Ha

And this circumstance is also a confidentiality breach juggs by Hauser. Man I hope whyte is innocent just to see what happens. Ha

RJJ Goatard strikes again . lol

[Robbie Barrett]

Boxingscene isn't fake news. Some of the writers who's articles they post are.

[hugh grant]

Is boxing scene famous among boxing forums?

[andocom]

Hearn did seem to say there were inaccuracies in the story and Whyte had lawyered up, I assume that means facts wrong, if that's the case there could be legal problems for Hauser and boxing scene as the publisher is liable as well as the author.

As far as leaking info, that's not usually an issue for a journalist, if it was someone at UKAD it would be, not sure if the fact it's concerning medical information could change things.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Whytes A sample did not test positive publicly yet so no its all hearsay and just what may or may not be an issue on what was found.

In the event it does its still leaking out a undisclosed finding at that time Hauser decided to go with the story...that's called being liable putting out info on a confidentiality case without permission from the fighter and that's against the rules enforced by the UKAD's rules ,he didn't speculate ,he outright accused and informed the public he was guilty,do you see the difference you re.tard ? Mr. fake azz law kid . lol


Now go away DUMBIUM go lick Furys arm pits there dry.

Hearn has confirmed there was an adverse finding in Whyte’s A sample...

As I said to sue for libel or slander, the information must be false. Please provide me anything Hauser said that was false?

Hauser never accused Whyte of being guilty as you can not be found guilty on just your A sample, Hauser even stated he has right to appeal, B sample etc.

Once again shamelessly defending a black muscular heavyweight...
This fetish of yours is out of control.

60 year old Nonce...

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

RJJ Goatard strikes again . lol

Imagine behaving like this in your 50/60’s😂😂

You seriously need to get a life before it’s too late...