Hearn keeps saying Boxingscene is fake news

[juggernaut666]

Well Coppinger just confirmed it on the Athletic

Whats IT ? lol

[Bmore18]

Whats IT ? lol

He tested positive for two different banned substances. He put the specific numbers in the article, but notes that they were considered "ultra-trace" amounts. Has quotes from Conte saying its enough to confirm he has been exposed to a PED. Hearn said he felt no obligation to tell anyone, but no details on why BBBOC cleared him nor info about B sample. Also good detail on the gloves issue. The BBBOC does not come out looking good. AT. ALL

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

YDKSAB let alone legalities when putting out damaging news that if proven false is called defamation of character.and boxing scene is liable for it bc they put it out there along with Hauser. So they better hope its a Whyte banning.

I know far more than you about both. I have an Grade A A level in law. Do you have any qualifications exceeding that?
Thought not...

Get a life you sad old b*stard...����

[juggernaut666]

He tested positive for two different banned substances. He put the specific numbers in the article, but notes that they were considered "ultra-trace" amounts. Has quotes from Conte saying its enough to confirm he has been exposed to a PED. Hearn said he felt no obligation to tell anyone, but no details on why BBBOC cleared him nor info about B sample. Also good detail on the gloves issue. The BBBOC does not come out looking good. AT. ALL

Wasn't this reported already? This is old news until B sample is tested. And still a verdict has to be announced this is old news. An announcement is supposed to be today of the mater.

[juggernaut666]

I know far more than you about both. I have an Grade A A level in law. Do you have any qualifications exceeding that?
Thought not...

Get a life you sad old b*stard...����

Ah great ANOTHER law guy made up alt on here ,that's like 3 now of probably the same re,tard.


No you don't know a lot and you are WAYYYY to dumb to be a law anything .lol

[Bmore18]

Wasn't this reported already? This is old news until B sample is tested. And still a verdict has to be announced this is old news.

Much of it is the same, but this thread was ****ting on BS and waiting for another reputable reporter to put something out on it so thats why I cited it. I have no idea why they havent already checked the B sample and got the results

[juggernaut666]

Much of it is the same, but this thread was ****ting on BS and waiting for another reputable reporter to put something out on it so thats why I cited it. I have no idea why they havent already checked the B sample and got the results

B samples can take up until 4/5 days plus ? . In this case its really important they get it right. could be a conflict of what they decide is a finding to ? If any or a strong case a by product of something else which CAN happen if traces are extremely small and he tested negative on others which has happened.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

He wrote the article bc it was true the exemption. IDK ivy league attorney,he put the info out himself making him the sole accuser he cannot blame the mysterious source here hes opened himself up for a civil lawsuit ,hes the publisher/writer who attached his name to it. lol


This isn't the Floyd follow up news ,he actually accused Whyte basically. Could avalanche on him. this site and him are sweating until tomorrow that's a fact. lol

Learn to read coherently you mentally challenged, middle aged spastic...

He only states Whyte’s A sample tested positive, which is confirmed to be CORRECT.

He is not accusing Whyte whatsoever, he even states Whyte has the right of appeal, and his B sample is yet to be tested.

Educate yourself or you’ll embarrass yourself...

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Ah great ANOTHER law guy made up alt on here ,that's like 3 now of probably the same re,tard.


No you don't know a lot and you are WAYYYY to dumb to be a law anything .lol

I’m not a law guy whatsoever but I’m more educated in law than you.

I’m dumb... you can’t even spell Klitschko correctly����

There’s an S in it r*tard...

“Klitchko”������

[juggernaut666]

Learn to read coherently you mentally challenged, middle aged spastic...

He only states Whyte’s A sample tested positive, which is confirmed to be CORRECT.

He is not accusing Whyte whatsoever, he even states Whyte has the right of appeal, and his B sample is yet to be tested.

Educate yourself or you’ll embarrass yourself...

Whytes A sample has not tested positive publicly by anyone but Hauser ? You f'ing dummy. lol

What this means is if the B sample is negative that means if Hauser is even right with an A sample has a defamation case against him for accusing someone for testing positive if the findings find Whyte innocent in the end .

Whyte had a hearing bf the fight ,this means something was found but its still defamation of character if Whyte is found innocent and the findings are related to a by product. Get it ,****** ? lol


In short if Whyte is found innocent hes screwed. Simple for a simpleton and was accused of wrong doing bc a guy from B scene wanted the attention first and broke the news.,and has an entire interview of what was in Whytes system but hes not accusing him????.lol


im sure you'll be wishing whyte is found guilty bc that's what losers do they wish bad on fighters .