Eddie must have had his account banned
Hearn keeps saying Boxingscene is fake news
Collapse
-
-
I made an argument for Hauser when he wrote the infamous article on USADA and Floyd’s TUE exception. Floyd fans were foaming at the mouth trying to discredit him. Hauser is an Ivy League educated attorney and knows how to conduct thorough research. He isn’t going to say something that will get him sued.Last edited by GhostofDempsey; 07-26-2019, 08:15 PM.Comment
-
YDKSAB let alone legalities when putting out damaging news that if proven false is called defamation of character.and boxing scene is liable for it bc they put it out there along with Hauser. So they better hope its a Whyte banning.
Comment
-
He wrote the article bc it was true the exemption. IDK ivy league attorney,he put the info out himself making him the sole accuser he cannot blame the mysterious source here hes opened himself up for a civil lawsuit ,hes the publisher/writer who attached his name to it. lolI made an argument for Hauser when he wrote the infamous article on USADA and Floyd’s TUE exception. Floyd fans were foaming at the mouth trying to discredit him. Hauler is an Ivy League educated attorney and knows how to conduct thorough research. He isn’t going to say something that will get him sued.
This isn't the Floyd follow up news ,he actually accused Whyte basically. Could avalanche on him. this site and him are sweating until tomorrow that's a fact. lolLast edited by juggernaut666; 07-26-2019, 08:14 PM.Comment
-
It is ironic how these same posters will credit Hauser's legitimacy now his articles are about: Hearn/Whyte instead of Floyd/Usada.I made an argument for Hauser when he wrote the infamous article on USADA and Floyd’s TUE exception. Floyd fans were foaming at the mouth trying to discredit him. Hauler is an Ivy League educated attorney and knows how to conduct thorough research. He isn’t going to say something that will get him sued.
I heard Hauser do an interview about the Whyte test failure. He mentioned that he wouldn't say what the PED was until he had it verified by multiple sources. So he obviously knows legally what he can and can't say. As well as from a credibility standpoint, he isn't going to say and or report anything until he knows its totally credible.Comment
-
He graduated from Columbia Law, and is an accomplished author who is all too familiar with research and not painting himself into a corner.He wrote the article bc it was true the exemption. IDK ivy league attorney,he put the info out himself making him the sole accuser he cannot blame the mysterious source here hes opened himself up for a civil lawsuit ,hes the publisher/writer who attached his name to it. lol
This isn't the Floyd follow up news ,he actually accused Whyte basically. Could avalanche on him. this site and him are sweating until tomorrow that's a fact. lolComment
-
It doesn’t surprise me. Floyd fans wanted Hauser’s head for that article, now Floyd/Wilder fans want to put his face on a stamp.It is ironic how these same posters will credit Hauser's legitimacy now his articles are about: Hearn/Whyte instead of Floyd/Usada.
I heard Hauser do an interview about the Whyte test failure. He mentioned that he wouldn't say what the PED was until he had it verified by multiple sources. So he obviously knows legally what he can and can't say. As well as from a credibility standpoint, he isn't going to say and or report anything until he knows its totally credible.Comment
-
All that's good but wont do him any good if they rule no wrong doing on Whytes part ,he will /should be hit with a civil lawsuit . Hes the one who started the entire thing and no schooling reverses that. lol And if true findings were found doesn't mean one should claim ped use without a final say of the matter...ooops.
I know painters that cant paint even shades who swear they are the best. lolComment
Comment