Hearn keeps saying Boxingscene is fake news

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GGG Gloveking
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2016
    • 12382
    • 658
    • 193
    • 189,439

    #21
    Eddie must have had his account banned

    Comment

    • GhostofDempsey
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2017
      • 31738
      • 13,152
      • 8,701
      • 493,602

      #22
      I made an argument for Hauser when he wrote the infamous article on USADA and Floyd’s TUE exception. Floyd fans were foaming at the mouth trying to discredit him. Hauser is an Ivy League educated attorney and knows how to conduct thorough research. He isn’t going to say something that will get him sued.
      Last edited by GhostofDempsey; 07-26-2019, 08:15 PM.

      Comment

      • juggernaut666
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2015
        • 15544
        • 1,226
        • 500
        • 87,472

        #23
        Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT
        When the truth becomes “fake news”...
        YDKSAB let alone legalities when putting out damaging news that if proven false is called defamation of character.and boxing scene is liable for it bc they put it out there along with Hauser. So they better hope its a Whyte banning.

        Comment

        • juggernaut666
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2015
          • 15544
          • 1,226
          • 500
          • 87,472

          #24
          Originally posted by GhostofDempsey
          I made an argument for Hauser when he wrote the infamous article on USADA and Floyd’s TUE exception. Floyd fans were foaming at the mouth trying to discredit him. Hauler is an Ivy League educated attorney and knows how to conduct thorough research. He isn’t going to say something that will get him sued.
          He wrote the article bc it was true the exemption. IDK ivy league attorney,he put the info out himself making him the sole accuser he cannot blame the mysterious source here hes opened himself up for a civil lawsuit ,hes the publisher/writer who attached his name to it. lol


          This isn't the Floyd follow up news ,he actually accused Whyte basically. Could avalanche on him. this site and him are sweating until tomorrow that's a fact. lol
          Last edited by juggernaut666; 07-26-2019, 08:14 PM.

          Comment

          • RoyJonesJrp4pno1
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2005
            • 4617
            • 113
            • 4
            • 39,642

            #25
            Originally posted by GhostofDempsey
            I made an argument for Hauser when he wrote the infamous article on USADA and Floyd’s TUE exception. Floyd fans were foaming at the mouth trying to discredit him. Hauler is an Ivy League educated attorney and knows how to conduct thorough research. He isn’t going to say something that will get him sued.
            It is ironic how these same posters will credit Hauser's legitimacy now his articles are about: Hearn/Whyte instead of Floyd/Usada.

            I heard Hauser do an interview about the Whyte test failure. He mentioned that he wouldn't say what the PED was until he had it verified by multiple sources. So he obviously knows legally what he can and can't say. As well as from a credibility standpoint, he isn't going to say and or report anything until he knows its totally credible.

            Comment

            • GhostofDempsey
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2017
              • 31738
              • 13,152
              • 8,701
              • 493,602

              #26
              Originally posted by juggernaut666
              He wrote the article bc it was true the exemption. IDK ivy league attorney,he put the info out himself making him the sole accuser he cannot blame the mysterious source here hes opened himself up for a civil lawsuit ,hes the publisher/writer who attached his name to it. lol


              This isn't the Floyd follow up news ,he actually accused Whyte basically. Could avalanche on him. this site and him are sweating until tomorrow that's a fact. lol
              He graduated from Columbia Law, and is an accomplished author who is all too familiar with research and not painting himself into a corner.

              Comment

              • GhostofDempsey
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2017
                • 31738
                • 13,152
                • 8,701
                • 493,602

                #27
                Originally posted by RoyJonesJrp4pno1
                It is ironic how these same posters will credit Hauser's legitimacy now his articles are about: Hearn/Whyte instead of Floyd/Usada.

                I heard Hauser do an interview about the Whyte test failure. He mentioned that he wouldn't say what the PED was until he had it verified by multiple sources. So he obviously knows legally what he can and can't say. As well as from a credibility standpoint, he isn't going to say and or report anything until he knows its totally credible.
                It doesn’t surprise me. Floyd fans wanted Hauser’s head for that article, now Floyd/Wilder fans want to put his face on a stamp.

                Comment

                • TBear
                  Lords of Boxingscene
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 113275
                  • 6,079
                  • 12,778
                  • 1,665,677,098

                  #28
                  Yes because people trust what Hearn says

                  Comment

                  • juggernaut666
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2015
                    • 15544
                    • 1,226
                    • 500
                    • 87,472

                    #29
                    Originally posted by GhostofDempsey
                    He graduated from Columbia Law, and is an accomplished author who is all too familiar with research and not painting himself into a corner.
                    All that's good but wont do him any good if they rule no wrong doing on Whytes part ,he will /should be hit with a civil lawsuit . Hes the one who started the entire thing and no schooling reverses that. lol And if true findings were found doesn't mean one should claim ped use without a final say of the matter...ooops.

                    I know painters that cant paint even shades who swear they are the best. lol

                    Comment

                    • Bmore18
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2019
                      • 1741
                      • 28
                      • 33
                      • 26,013

                      #30
                      Well Coppinger just confirmed it on the Athletic

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP