Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte Tested Positive For Two Dianabol Metabolites

[kafkod]

When told about the initial positive, Whyte asked for his B sample to be tested, as is his right, which would not have been possible until this week. This meant Ukad, the sport’s governing body the British Boxing Board of Control, and the World Boxing Council’s chosen testing body the Voluntary Anti-Doping Agency had little option but to allow him to fight.

Here’s another one for you....


Under rules in place in the United Kingdom, Whyte has a right of appeal. UKAD takes the position that, until the adjudication process is over and due process is complete, there has not been a finding that a fighter is in breach of its PED protocols and no sanctions can be put in place by the British Boxing Board of Control.

That information is not correct and there were no links published with Hauser's story to verify it.

That rubbish was what Hearn was talking about when he said that legal letters had already been sent to news outlets who published false information about UKAD and the BBBoC.

UKAD and the BBBoC have the power to provisionally suspend any athlete who tests positive immediately, if they think it necessary.

If UKAD didn't have the power to suspend Whyte before his B sample was analysed, then why did they call him in for a meeting to decide whether to clear him to fight or not?

[SchoolTheseCats]

I might be a dunce, because that reads like gibberish to me!

I think you're saying that UKAD couldn't do anything.

And VADA don't have their tests back yet (so what's the point of pre fight testing?).

And that the WBC's appointed doping agency knew about it but couldn't report back to the WBC?

So... you believe that he could be roided up to the gills and the agencies wouldn't do anything?

Then... why hold an urgent meeting with him?

Ukad/bbboc can’t do anything until b sample results are back vada doesn’t suspend people they report they findings to commissions and in this case it was a test ukad conducted that came back dirty.... Once Whyte requested his B sample be tested it started the procedurals of him not committing a doping violation until his B sample is tested and findings are revealed if it wasn’t because it was 3 days before fight it would of probably been cancel since his b results would of been back in sufficient amount of time

[SchoolTheseCats]

That information is not correct and there were no links published with Hauser's story to verify it.

That rubbish was what Hearn was talking about when he said that legal letters had already been sent to news outlets who published false information about UKAD and the BBBoC.

UKAD and the BBBoC have the power to provisionally suspend any athlete who tests positive immediately, if they think it necessary.

That information is part of they procedurals process..... once Whyte triggered his b sample to be tested he is innocent until all results are back as part of ukad testing policy since it was only 3 days before fight and not weeks it was allowed to carry on since the results of his B sample wouldn’t of been back before fight took place.... Fight only happen because of a technicality just like nysac couldn’t suspend miller because he wasn’t licensed yet leaving his suspension in the hands of wba which gave him a bs 6 month suspension

[kafkod]

I might be a dunce, because that reads like gibberish to me!

I think you're saying that UKAD couldn't do anything.

And VADA don't have their tests back yet (so what's the point of pre fight testing?).

And that the WBC's appointed doping agency knew about it but couldn't report back to the WBC?

So... you believe that he could be roided up to the gills and the agencies wouldn't do anything?

Then... why hold an urgent meeting with him?

I just made that point myself. The meeting was called in order to decide whether to clear Dillian to fight or not. That in itself proves that they could have refused to clear him if they'd wanted to.

[kafkod]

That information is part of they procedurals process..... once Whyte triggered his b sample to be tested he is innocent until all results are back as part of ukad testing policy since it was only 3 days before fight and not weeks it was allowed to carry on since the results of his B sample wouldn’t of been back before fight took place.... Fight only happen because of a technicality just like nysac couldn’t suspend miller because he wasn’t licensed yet leaving his suspension in the hands of wba which gave him a bs 6 month suspension

Bullshit.

I already posted links for you yesterday proving that the last time Dillian Whyte failed a UKAD test they suspended him immediately. He appealed and asked for his B sample to be analysed that time too.

[SchoolTheseCats]

Bullshit.

I already posted links for you yesterday proving that the last time Dillian Whyte failed a UKAD test they suspended him immediately. He appealed and asked for his B sample to be analysed that time too.

They suspended him weeks later after his previous fight was over before he was about to announce his next fight... After his A and B sample was tested

[kafkod]

Weird how people are putting forward mutually exclusive arguments here.

1. The UK PED testing system doesn't work. If a fighter appeals against a failed test, he can't be stopped from fighting until his B sample is analysed and the "procedures" are completed .. and that can take a year or more.

2. Eddie Hearn is a disgusting POS for not cancelling the fight as soon as Dillian Whyte was flagged by UKAD.

Make your minds up fellas. you can't have it both ways.

[kafkod]

They suspended him weeks later after his previous fight was over before he was about to announce his next fight... After his A and B sample was tested

You just ignore evidence when it's posted and keep lying. You are a turd, mate.

[roxythecat]

How many times was he tested by VADA in the 12 weeks before the fight? Please no guessing only the facts if they are available.

[SchoolTheseCats]

You just ignore evidence when it's posted and keep lying. You are a turd, mate.

Did ukad not suspend him weeks later after both samples was tested? Was he not on his way to a press conference to announce his next bout before ukad contacted him and it postponed? This are facts lol only you die hards that want to defend the indefensible trying spin ukad policy which is only reason fight was allowed to take place wasn’t because he was clean or they was satisfied with what they heard at hearing its only because the B sample results wouldn’t of been back in time to stop fight from going on since a fighter per they rules are innocent until all testing and investigation is done