Whyte popped for multiple drugs

[REDEEMER]

Lmao you think I'm a WIdler fan, haha? You're such a ****ing troll man.

I don't know what you are ,I know you aren't reading what im posting so you might as well be . Ha

I also wasn't the one insinuating one agency is better then the other you were and went on a UKAD rant when they busted Whyte not VADA? Please think before you post.

[Beercules]

PEDs work in a combination.


You don't just take one drug alone.

[thesmokingman]

I don't know what you are ,I know you aren't reading what im posting so you might as well be . Ha

I also wasn't the one insinuating one agency is better then the other you were and went on a UKAD rant when they busted Whyte not VADA? Please think before you post.

Yea you were. You are defending UKAD like a troll. They don't have to notify the sanctioning body BS. GFTO. You are worse than the obvious trollers because you pretend to be honest.

[REDEEMER]

Yea you were. You are defending UKAD like a troll. They don't have to notify the sanctioning body BS. GFTO. You are worse than the obvious trollers because you pretend to be honest.

UKAD has loop holes VADA has less diligent testing. No you're not a wilder...not at all...?

The testing agencies aren't requires to notify sanctioning bodies because those only involved with the actual fighters contracts get notified because it a confidentiality process. If the fight goes through and the fighter decides to appeal under UKAD it then can be postponed ,that's what Fury did.


Again VADA didn't find su****ious activity so the sanctioning bodies were not notified which under them would be. Sure your not a wilder fan ? Could have fooled me, not much thought process has been established here.

[BoloShot]

Watch Fast Eddie squirm in interviews over this one...

[johnbook]

Mauricio Sulaiman, president of the WBC and a committed anti-drugs campaigner who had sanctioned the bout as a final eliminator for Deontay Wilder's world title confirmed to Sportsmail late on Wednesday night: 'We are hearing the same.'

The Boxing Scene website had reported 'multiple sources' alleging Whyte had tested positive for 'at least two banned substances.'



I interpreted it as meaning that they been talking to inside sources & they know its 2 substances,im sure it'll come out later today as being 2 as that's usually how it goes,as why would they write that unless Sulaiman confirmed it off the record

As I wrote: DM's The Boxing Scene website had reported 'multiple sources' alleging Whyte had tested positive for 'at least two banned substances.' is wrong. BS has it "one or more."
The only source they cited is BScene.

You made an assumption w.o. justification.
/matter.

[kushking]

As I wrote: DM's The Boxing Scene website had reported 'multiple sources' alleging Whyte had tested positive for 'at least two banned substances.' is wrong. BS has it "one or more."
The only source they cited is BScene.

You made an assumption w.o. justification.
/matter.

So sue me,the truth will come out soon enough,& they just said they spoke to Sulaiman you clown

[Citizen Koba]

You and lot of ppl here keep citing the CBP as if it's some gold standard when you don't even know that most guys on the CBP NEVER get tested. It's not like the Olympics or Cycling, or hell even the ATP who actually are well funded and do many random tests. The WBC CBP is just street cred, it's not real. Guys are not being testing OOC, so please stop using the CBP as if it means something.

Thus what I said by UKAD handled the testing and that this has nothing to do with VADA, I meant it literally.

Another, B sample testing is pointless. And this alone should make you weary of UKAD acting like its some important step because it is NOT. The A and B samples are in FACT the same SAMPLE! A single sample is taken and it's split into two, A and B. The only point of testing the B sample is if their is some dispute with the chain of custody of said samples. B sample does not prove innocence lol.

UKAD ARE EXPOSED because they failed to notify the SANCTIONING BODY.

I'm not trolling you but you have been sticking jabs at me in these replies. DO YOU NOT SEE THE CORRUPTION?????

Why would UKAD not inform the sanctioning body and instead inform the promoter? The UK promoter instead? And you do know that this fight happened right?

WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU?????????

Their rules do not require them to inform the sanctioning body initially... neither do VADAs for that matter - didn't I link you to the VADA regs in an earlier post (http://vada-testing.org/forms/vada_r...10-26-12.pdf)? I agree that the sanctioning body should probably be in the loop too, but the burden of responsibility for doping and deciding whether the fight should be allowed to proceed lies squarely with the governing body, the sanctioning body basically only get to decide what titles etc are on the line. They can refuse to sanction a fight - or retroactively de-sanction it - they can strip you of your titles and even ban you from fighting for any of their titles, but they have no jurisdiction to stop a fight from happening or taking any punitive action against a fighter beyond what relates to their own sanctioning of fights. In cases like this I'd say informing them is of secondary importance.

The lead promoter obviously needs to be informed because they have to make practical decisions - such as whether to pull the plug on the event, instigate back up plans - alternative opponents etc... this is a professional sport with livelihoods and a lot of money at stake... to not inform the promoter of circumstances that could derail their event would likely be litigable I would guess, but at the very least disruptive to the point of impracticality.

The thing which disgusts me is that the opposing fighter or their team is not informed seeing as that's the guy whose health is most directly put at risk. That ish needs to be changed both under VADA and UKAD regs.

If you believe there has been corruption however, I'd suggest the BBBoC are more likely to be the culprits than UKADA who have just folowed the same protocols they use for everyone else - rightly or wrongly. - though I'd suggest that we probably need considerably more information than we have at present to make such a determination.

EDIT: On the issue of the inefficacy of the CBP though we're in pretty much complete agreement, the damn thing's basically a fig leaf the way I see it.. more about PR than a genuine attempt to tackle the issue of doping within the sport

[johnbook]

So sue me,the truth will come out soon enough,& they just said they spoke to Sulaiman you clown

I see why you ASSume all the time.

[Guest]

Im well aware I just wanted to create a separate thread showing the latest development that it was for at least 2 different drugs

Why not post it in the EXISTING THREAD?