Whyte popped for multiple drugs

[thesmokingman]

That doesn't even make sense kid, how am I a fan boy of a doping agency now when the fact is VADA gave the green light to let Whyte fight while UKAD supposedly didn't ? Whyte has to clear VADA first because they would halt the fight. UKAD lets fights go even if theres a positive test ,just look at the Fury / Klitschko situation .

They knew Fury popped dirty months prior but clever Fury pulled that legal mental illness stuff.....sorry but you have no clue what you're posting. Ha

Because I've seen you keep reposting the same nonsense about how much better than UKAD is versus VADA. That's ironic since UKAD have just been exposed!

[Guest]

Apparently according to daily mail Whyte popped dirty for at least 2 drugs,which is consistent with straight up cheats like baby huey miller, I've noticed they always get popped with multiple substances when fighters are actually juicing which is also consistent with what heroidia claims about how fighters juice sometimes even using designer drug analogs that don't show on non vada tests. apparently it's because only côcktails work to actually make a noticeable difference. I will say I noticed whyte sounded like he was saying hed start juicing to even the playing field as he says AJ is juicing so he apparently used it as vindication to juice even though AJs never popped dirty

Already an existing thread on this exact same topic:

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=822318

[REDEEMER]

Because I've seen you keep reposting the same nonsense about how much better than UKAD is versus VADA. That's ironic since UKAD have just been exposed!

Well that would be a shock to me considering ive never even posted on VADA or UKAD ever on here prior to I logged on tonight ?

You sound like a wound up Wilder fan so i'll just reiterate the initial post and that's Whyte cannot fight at all if he doesn't pass VADA but theres loop holes around UKADA's system because they don't stop fights if su****ion of illegal substance is found, only until at least a B sample is scrutinized will they bring it to a legal hearing. sorry for the big boy words , im sure you'll just respond with the crayon talk. Ha

Edit :UKAD was the ones who busted Whyte Supposedly so how are they exposed beyond letting the fight go on and but VADA cleared Whyte ? What organization or company do you think gets away with less as far as using illegal things VADA or UKAD if you are that concerned with the two ? Ha

[kushking]

Already an existing thread on this exact same topic:

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=822318

Im well aware I just wanted to create a separate thread showing the latest development that it was for at least 2 different drugs

[johnbook]

Apparently according to daily mail Whyte popped dirty for at least 2 drugs,which is consistent with straight up cheats like baby huey miller, I've noticed they always get popped with multiple substances when fighters are actually juicing which is also consistent with what heroidia claims about how fighters juice sometimes even using designer drug analogs that don't show on non vada tests. apparently it's because only côcktails work to actually make a noticeable difference. I will say I noticed whyte sounded like he was saying hed start juicing to even the playing field as he says AJ is juicing so he apparently used it as vindication to juice even though AJs never popped dirty

Did you bother to read??

The DailyMail piece refers back to boxingscene and repeats the "one or more" not two.

This is the only DM piece I could find.:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sp...car-Rivas.html

[johnbook]

To clarify my above: It appears that the "genius" writing for DM interpreted BS' "one or more" to equal two. Of course it does not.

[thesmokingman]

Well that would be a shock to me considering ive never even posted on VADA or UKAD ever on here prior to I logged on tonight ?

You sound like a wound up Wilder fan so i'll just reiterate the initial post and that's Whyte cannot fight at all if he doesn't pass VADA but theres loop holes around UKADA's system because they don't stop fights if su****ion of illegal substance is found, only until at least a B sample is scrutinized will they bring it to a legal hearing. sorry for the big boy words , im sure you'll just respond with the crayon talk. Ha

Edit :UKAD was the ones who busted Whyte Supposedly so how are they exposed beyond letting the fight go on and but VADA cleared Whyte ? What organization or company do you think gets away with less as far as using illegal things VADA or UKAD if you are that concerned with the two ? Ha

You and lot of ppl here keep citing the CBP as if it's some gold standard when you don't even know that most guys on the CBP NEVER get tested. It's not like the Olympics or Cycling, or hell even the ATP who actually are well funded and do many random tests. The WBC CBP is just street cred, it's not real. Guys are not being testing OOC, so please stop using the CBP as if it means something.

Thus what I said by UKAD handled the testing and that this has nothing to do with VADA, I meant it literally.

Another, B sample testing is pointless. And this alone should make you weary of UKAD acting like its some important step because it is NOT. The A and B samples are in FACT the same SAMPLE! A single sample is taken and it's split into two, A and B. The only point of testing the B sample is if their is some dispute with the chain of custody of said samples. B sample does not prove innocence lol.

UKAD ARE EXPOSED because they failed to notify the SANCTIONING BODY.

I'm not trolling you but you have been sticking jabs at me in these replies. DO YOU NOT SEE THE CORRUPTION?????

Why would UKAD not inform the sanctioning body and instead inform the promoter? The UK promoter instead? And you do know that this fight happened right?

WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU?????????

[kushking]

To clarify my above: It appears that the "genius" writing for DM interpreted BS' "one or more" to equal two. Of course it does not.

Mauricio Sulaiman, president of the WBC and a committed anti-drugs campaigner who had sanctioned the bout as a final eliminator for Deontay Wilder's world title confirmed to Sportsmail late on Wednesday night: 'We are hearing the same.'

The Boxing Scene website had reported 'multiple sources' alleging Whyte had tested positive for 'at least two banned substances.'



I interpreted it as meaning that they been talking to inside sources & they know its 2 substances,im sure it'll come out later today as being 2 as that's usually how it goes,as why would they write that unless Sulaiman confirmed it off the record

[REDEEMER]

You and lot of ppl here keep citing the CBP as if it's some gold standard when you don't even know that most guys on the CBP NEVER get tested. It's not like the Olympics or Cycling, or hell even the ATP who actually are well funded and do many random tests. The WBC CBP is just street cred, it's not real. Guys are not being testing OOC, so please stop using the CBP as if it means something.

Thus what I said by UKAD handled the testing and that this has nothing to do with VADA, I meant it literally.

Another, B sample testing is pointless. And this alone should make you weary of UKAD acting like its some important step because it is NOT. The A and B samples are in FACT the same SAMPLE! A single sample is taken and it's split into two, A and B. The only point of testing the B sample is if their is some dispute with the chain of custody of said samples. B sample does not prove innocence lol.

UKAD ARE EXPOSED because they failed to notify the SANCTIONING BODY.

I'm not trolling you but you have been sticking jabs at me in these replies. DO YOU NOT SEE THE CORRUPTION?????

Why would UKAD not inform the sanctioning body and instead inform the promoter? The UK promoter instead? And you do know that this fight happened right?

WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU?????????

The CBP is associated with VADA so what are you talking about ?That is what the WBC does so once again it should be the gold standard if your a wilder fan so you have no idea what you're talking about because the other drug agency UKAD found banned substances not VADA ? Ha

You don't know what your saying at this point you tell me UKAD isn't better but don't you know the CBP is run by the WBC as well ?

UKAD has to notify the promoters and such they are not obligated to notify the sanctioning bodies that is the promoters and managers job the UKAD and VADA agencies aren't policing the sport they can only test and adhere to the rules they cannot stop a fight .Under UKAD rules again they cant notify or claim someones doing something illegal until its proven.


VADA can inform the athletic commission and they can stop a fight in there rules but UKAD has loop holes but they have stricter testing, its how Fury got out of the Wlad debacle . But Whyte passed VADA ,don't you understand this ?It means no illegal substance was found under there rules or list. Ha

[thesmokingman]

The CBP is associated with VADA so what are you talking about ?That is what the WBC does so once again it should be the gold standard if your a wilder fan so you have no idea what you're talking about because the other drug agency UKAD found banned substances not VADA ? Ha

You don't know what your saying at this point you tell me UKAD isn't better but don't you know the CBP is run by the WBC as well ?

UKAD has to notify the promoters and such they are not obligated to notify the sanctioning bodies that is the promoters and managers job the UKAD and VADA agencies aren't policing the sport they can only test and adhere to the rules they cannot stop a fight .Under UKAD rules again they cant notify or claim someones doing something illegal until its proven.


VADA can inform the athletic commission and they can stop a fight in there rules but UKAD has loop holes but they have stricter testing, its how Fury got out of the Wlad debacle . But Whyte passed VADA ,don't you understand this ?It means no illegal substance was found under there rules or list. Ha

Lmao you think I'm a WIdler fan, haha? You're such a ****ing troll man.