Whyte popped for multiple drugs

[kushking]

Why not post it in the EXISTING THREAD?

Because at the time it was unknown by most & nobody is even bothering to read the regular threads posts anymore they just go to the last page. Why in the flying fck do you care so goddamned much that I created another thread amongst the countless shltpost threads?

Are you the damage control publicist for ***** Whyte?

[Guest]

Because at the time it was unknown by most & nobody is even bothering to read the regular threads posts anymore they just go to the last page. Why in the flying fck do you care so goddamned much that I created another thread amongst the countless shltpost threads?

Are you the damage control publicist for ***** Whyte?

You could have gone for Dillian Shyte.

But I came in this morning because I wanted to read about it - multiple sources online had quoted the BS news thread on the subject - and there's about FIFTY threads on the same subject.

[kushking]

You could have gone for Dillian Shyte.

But I came in this morning because I wanted to read about it - multiple sources online had quoted the BS news thread on the subject - and there's about FIFTY threads on the same subject.

Your a coward that creats threads about me & blocks me yet here you are trolling my thread like the lil btch you are BLOCKED & reported

[kushking]

You could have gone for Dillian Shyte.

But I came in this morning because I wanted to read about it - multiple sources online had quoted the BS news thread on the subject - and there's about FIFTY threads on the same subject.

I am now officially vindicated

https://www.boxingscene.com/dillian-whyte-tested-positive-two-dianabol-metabolites--141198

[thesmokingman]

Their rules do not require them to inform the sanctioning body initially... neither do VADAs for that matter - didn't I link you to the VADA regs in an earlier post (http://vada-testing.org/forms/vada_r...10-26-12.pdf)? I agree that the sanctioning body should probably be in the loop too, but the burden of responsibility for doping and deciding whether the fight should be allowed to proceed lies squarely with the governing body, the sanctioning body basically only get to decide what titles etc are on the line. They can refuse to sanction a fight - or retroactively de-sanction it - they can strip you of your titles and even ban you from fighting for any of their titles, but they have no jurisdiction to stop a fight from happening or taking any punitive action against a fighter beyond what relates to their own sanctioning of fights. In cases like this I'd say informing them is of secondary importance.

The lead promoter obviously needs to be informed because they have to make practical decisions - such as whether to pull the plug on the event, instigate back up plans - alternative opponents etc... this is a professional sport with livelihoods and a lot of money at stake... to not inform the promoter of circumstances that could derail their event would likely be litigable I would guess, but at the very least disruptive to the point of impracticality.

The thing which disgusts me is that the opposing fighter or their team is not informed seeing as that's the guy whose health is most directly put at risk. That ish needs to be changed both under VADA and UKAD regs.

If you believe there has been corruption however, I'd suggest the BBBoC are more likely to be the culprits than UKADA who have just folowed the same protocols they use for everyone else - rightly or wrongly. - though I'd suggest that we probably need considerably more information than we have at present to make such a determination.

EDIT: On the issue of the inefficacy of the CBP though we're in pretty much complete agreement, the damn thing's basically a fig leaf the way I see it.. more about PR than a genuine attempt to tackle the issue of doping within the sport

Do you think their rules or whatever BS they call their rules ethical? WHAT IS THE FKING POINT OF ANTIDOPING IF YOU ALLOW DOPERS TO FIGHT AFTER YOU HAVE CAUGHT THEM???????

This is pure negligence and corruption.

That ish needs to be changed both under VADA and UKAD regs.

Are you stoned? This is a UKAD/BBBoC problem. VADA guidelines dictate the sanctioning body and the fighter at risk, in this case Rivas. How the **** is this a VADA problem too?

[thesmokingman]

I am now officially vindicated
https://www.boxingscene.com/dillian-...olites--141198

That's not vindication, because you posted inaccurate info and got lucky. If you said you bet he used 2, that'd be one thing but lmao, you trying to take the win on this is.... c'mon. Ya didn't even read the link you based it on e thoroughly.

[kushking]

That's not vindication, because you posted inaccurate info and got lucky. If you said you bet he used 2, that'd be one thing but lmao, you trying to take the win on this is.... c'mon. Ya didn't even read the link you based it on e thoroughly.

Wtf are you talking about I unlike you can read between the lines which is why I posted that it's common sense he was popped for more than 1 drug due to the FACT they had reported they conferred with Sulaiman directly & because they would've been sued otherwise & because its just common sense that they wouldn't have written that unless they were told directly by the head of the WBC

They also said they talked to boxingscene as any reporters do when referencing outside journos. YOU claimed they warent saying it was 2 drugs at least then you read it & concluded they were assuming

[thesmokingman]

Wtf are you talking about I unlike you can read between the lines which is why I posted that it's common sense he was popped for more than 1 drug due to the FACT they had reported they conferred with Sulaiman directly & because they would've been sued otherwise & because its just common sense that they wouldn't have written that unless they were told directly by the head of the WBC

They also said they talked to boxingscene as any reporters do when referencing outside journos. YOU claimed they warent saying it was 2 drugs at least then you read it & concluded they were assuming

Do us a favor and stop posting. It was one drug, dbol. You don't know crap about it obviously. As it leaves the body it leaves markers. There were two traces detected of these markers. It's NOT TWO SUBSTANCES dumbass.

[4truth]

Still waiting for official word on what the banned substance was. Maybe a wait and see approach is the best approach, I mean what is the rush?

Hard for me to believe Whyte would knowingly take something, knowing he was being constantly tested and knowing everything that was at stake.

That said, i'm still scratching my head over Miller's ******ity.

[thesmokingman]

Still waiting for official word on what the banned substance was. Maybe a wait and see approach is the best approach, I mean what is the rush?

Hard for me to believe Whyte would knowingly take something, knowing he was being constantly tested and knowing everything that was at stake.

That said, i'm still scratching my head over Miller's ******ity.

As I wrote he was caught for two metabolites of dianabol, or dbol for short.