Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ruedboy
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2015
    • 4164
    • 386
    • 381
    • 101,745

    #151
    Originally posted by larryxxx..
    At 28 Canelo has already faced more world champs so how can there be an argument?
    How hard is it to understand that saying a fighter beat a world champ (or even faced a world champ) is meaningless without giving some context? Context is simply more info, such as the former champ's age, how long ago did he win the title, what weight was the title for etc.
    Alverez defeated former world champ Shane Mosley, Mosley was over 40 at the time, he had lost 7X and he had just had a draw with Sergio Mora. To say Alvarez beat the former 3x world champ Mosely sounds impressive but you have to know less than nothing about boxing, to be impressed. SMH

    Comment

    • Thuglife Nelo
      Banned
      • Dec 2018
      • 26836
      • 1,299
      • 1,822
      • 654,176

      #152
      GHABOR had an off night! GGG's first pro fight everz

      TIMESTAMPED! CLICK TO PLAY!

      Comment

      • Larry the boss
        EDUCATED
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 90798
        • 6,419
        • 4,473
        • 2,500,480

        #153
        Originally posted by WarGatti
        You tell me Larry sir, i am baffled by your musings. Would you tell golovkin to his face that his resume sucks?

        Im on your side btw i would enjoy watching you annihilate prettyboy32. But I can't just say nothing while you discredit a mans whole life and hard work (ggg) his resume isn't elite but don't pretend like he wasnt ducked in his prime and ripened for the cherrypick (and still arguably won) by canelo.
        why do i need to confront a man about his resume?? he has 0 great wins and that is a fact..at 37 he has 0 great wins and his record is 5-1-1 against current or former champs..all i am doing is posting facts

        Comment

        • Larry the boss
          EDUCATED
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 90798
          • 6,419
          • 4,473
          • 2,500,480

          #154
          Originally posted by ruedboy
          How hard is it to understand that saying a fighter beat a world champ (or even faced a world champ) is meaningless without giving some context? Context is simply more info, such as the former champ's age, how long ago did he win the title, what weight was the title for etc.
          Alverez defeated former world champ Shane Mosley, Mosley was over 40 at the time, he had lost 7X and he had just had a draw with Sergio Mora. To say Alvarez beat the former 3x world champ Mosely sounds impressive but you have to know less than nothing about boxing, to be impressed. SMH
          yet Ouma and Ishida were posted for wins for GGG?? please tell me just one great win this guy has..just one

          Comment

          • ruedboy
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2015
            • 4164
            • 386
            • 381
            • 101,745

            #155
            Originally posted by larryxxx..
            yet Ouma and Ishida were posted for wins for GGG?? please tell me just one great win this guy has..just one
            How do you determine a "great" win? What's the criteria?

            Comment

            • aboutfkntime
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2015
              • 47365
              • 1,631
              • 3,563
              • 391,308

              #156
              Originally posted by Boxing1013
              I don't think you know how language and words even work lol


              well, I know that Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe..... are not better wins than Lara, Cotto, and Trout

              keep..... " trying "

              or, whatever it is that you are doing LMAO

              Comment

              • aboutfkntime
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2015
                • 47365
                • 1,631
                • 3,563
                • 391,308

                #157
                " isn't elite "..... ???

                Originally posted by WarGatti
                You tell me Larry sir, i am baffled by your musings. Would you tell golovkin to his face that his resume sucks?

                Im on your side btw i would enjoy watching you annihilate prettyboy32. But I can't just say nothing while you discredit a mans whole life and hard work (ggg) his resume isn't elite but don't pretend like he wasnt ducked in his prime and ripened for the cherrypick (and still arguably won) by canelo.


                a far more accurate word is..... " average "

                FACT: the fights were there..... because, I can name them

                FACT: Golovkin is 100% responsible - therefore accountable - for his own shabby resume, because of his own timid selection policy

                Comment

                • aboutfkntime
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 47365
                  • 1,631
                  • 3,563
                  • 391,308

                  #158
                  Originally posted by ruedboy
                  How hard is it to understand that saying a fighter beat a world champ (or even faced a world champ) is meaningless without giving some context? Context is simply more info, such as the former champ's age, how long ago did he win the title, what weight was the title for etc.
                  Alverez defeated former world champ Shane Mosley, Mosley was over 40 at the time, he had lost 7X and he had just had a draw with Sergio Mora. To say Alvarez beat the former 3x world champ Mosely sounds impressive but you have to know less than nothing about boxing, to be impressed. SMH


                  the fact remains..... the thread starter came to his " conclusions " by labeling Vanes as "good"..... and Mosley as "ok"

                  he also said that Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara, Cotto, and Trout, were for Canelo

                  surely you can see whats up there..... ?

                  Comment

                  • aboutfkntime
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2015
                    • 47365
                    • 1,631
                    • 3,563
                    • 391,308

                    #159
                    Originally posted by ruedboy
                    How do you determine a "great" win? What's the criteria?


                    oh for ****s sake.... stop it

                    Comment

                    • Larry the boss
                      EDUCATED
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 90798
                      • 6,419
                      • 4,473
                      • 2,500,480

                      #160
                      Originally posted by ruedboy
                      How do you determine a "great" win? What's the criteria?
                      Has he defeated anyone who was even close to great?? only 5 were even world champs for crying out loud...0 hall of famers..NONE!!!! what are you celebrating is the better question

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP