You know full well why they hate him so much but they’ll never admit it. What does haymon and PBC even have to do with his thread....that’s how much they are obsessed with him
Something about Haymon makes these guys go full dummy. All previously used logic goes out the window.
Interesting. My question......who is charlo supposed to fight to "step up the competition??" We have canelo not even mentioning his name, and ggg already blatantly ducked him. Why isnt anyone calling ggg out for ducking charlo and making excuses as to why charlo doesnt "deserve" to fight ggg??? Also.......what horrible pbc cards did haymon put on this year???? Just curious.
Boxing fans should stop co-signing the WBC's blatant corruption and favouritism.
Charlo was the WBC mandatory challenger. It should have been Canelo, as the champion, who was ordered to fight him after he took the title from GGG, not Golovkin. .
It would be interesting if you could explain that comment.
What exactly did I say which could be taken as hateful towards people of Haymon's "persuasion", whatever the fck he meant by that?
Originally posted by kafkod
Jeez, man you really are full of it!
A lady of Haymon's "persuasion" is part of the Royal Family of that most colonial/imperialist nation in history!
You obviously understood what he meant by your response. You proved the point with the dismissal as if there aren't people who dislike Haymon for racial or colonial reasons. A royal wedding doesn't change that.
You obviously understood what he meant by your response. You proved the point with the dismissal as if there aren't people who dislike Haymon for racial or colonial reasons. A royal wedding doesn't change that.
Of course I understood what he meant.
Now explain how me dismissing what he said proves that it's true?
Now explain how me dismissing what he said proves that it's true?
I could, but it would be pointless. How about you make it easy on us and tell us the motive behind your dismissive response. Eliminates the need for a back and forth.
I could, but it would be pointless. How about you make it easy on us and tell us the motive behind your dismissive response. Eliminates the need for a back and forth.
I dismissed what he said because he was talking bollocks.
Tweet
is part of the Royal Family of that most colonial/imperialist nation in history!
Comment