Comments Thread For: Bradley 'Banking On Thurman To Get Job Done' Versus Pacquiao
Collapse
-
What's even more strange is that Keith & Manny are enrolled in VADA & all championship bouts are supposed to have testing.
If there is no testing for this fight, people will point fingers at Manny but it's my understanding that the Nevada Athletic Commission is in charge of that. Fighters can't ask for there to not be drug tests.Comment
-
Comment
-
This fight is a Catch 22 for "One time". He is in a no-win situation. If Thurman looks good then they will say so what? He beat up an old man. Then again if he loses they will say he ain't shit because he lost to a 40 year old ass Manny Pacquiao.Comment
-
Comment
-
Why is he being salty for giving his honest opinion of the fight? Bradley is one of the smarter boxer/analysts in the game. He certainly knows more about the sport than anybody in here. Perhaps his insights into this fight are worth a bit more than those of emotional fanboys? Pacquiao made Bradley rich and famous, so what reason does he have to speak ill of him? The way I see it, the better Pac looks the better Bradley does.Originally posted by InsanityisblissBradley being a salty clown as always when he talks about Pacquiao.Comment
-
No. Not bashing him, but Floyd is no risk-taker. He knows his body is not the same anymore and he would never risk his 0 against any of the young lions. He is no doubt looking to make money of his name, but not via any proposition that could risk his legacy. Manny's sheer willingness to fight the young lions at 40 is crazy. He and Floyd are both great, but they are definitely NOT cut from the same cloth.Comment
-
If the fight is in the states their is always going to be some level of testing. Most state commissions require it.Comment
Comment