Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why are the same people who hated on golovkin now hating on lomachenko?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Mr. 97k

    Lil G

    Triple L

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by RetroSpeed05 View Post
      Name a fighter with a better resume from 126-135.
      What does everyone from 126-135 have to do with Lomachenko's resume?

      I'll ask again; Exactly WHO has Lomachenko beaten?

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
        What does everyone from 126-135 have to do with Lomachenko's resume?

        I'll ask again; Exactly WHO has Lomachenko beaten?
        Russell, linares, rigondeaux, walters. 3 of whom were unbeaten, whilst linares hadnt lost for a long time.

        Comment


        • #44
          Americans who are jealous of the slick Ukrainians

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Madison boxing View Post
            Russell, linares, rigondeaux, walters. 3 of whom were unbeaten, whilst linares hadnt lost for a long time.
            so those are great wins for loma?? so why slam Spence and crawford??

            you picked brook to beat spence

            mikey was undefeated when spence beat him yet you wanna give loma credit for beating rigo

            how can you explain that?

            Crawford took Horns 0 while moving up in weight yet you slam him

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Madison boxing View Post
              Russell, linares, rigondeaux, walters. 3 of whom were unbeaten, whilst linares hadnt lost for a long time.
              Yep, and NONE of those wins warrant P4P consideration. Not one.

              Face the FACTS, Lomachenko's standout accomplishment is LOSING to Orlando Salido...

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by larryxxx.. View Post
                mikey was undefeated when spence beat him yet you wanna give loma credit for beating rigo

                how can you explain that?
                And if I may add, Spence doesn't have a LOSS to an Orlando Salido type of opponent...

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
                  And if I may add, Spence doesn't have a LOSS to an Orlando Salido type of opponent...
                  op does this all the time and exposes himself as the true biased poster

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
                    Yep, and NONE of those wins warrant P4P consideration. Not one.

                    Face the FACTS, Lomachenko's standout accomplishment is LOSING to Orlando Salido...
                    What fighters in their prime have a better set of wins currently?

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by larryxxx.. View Post
                      so those are great wins for loma?? so why slam Spence and crawford??

                      you picked brook to beat spence

                      mikey was undefeated when spence beat him yet you wanna give loma credit for beating rigo

                      how can you explain that?

                      Crawford took Horns 0 while moving up in weight yet you slam him
                      Mikey was much smaller and he wasnt no rigondeaux. That was considered much more of a competitive.match up than mikey/spence, didnt.roy jones say it was the best fight ever? Brook was coming off a loss and likely weight drained but it was a decent win. Horn is C level.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP