Why are the same people who hated on golovkin now hating on lomachenko?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lizard_man
    Undisputed Champion
    • Jul 2008
    • 2598
    • 370
    • 20
    • 48,631

    #41
    Mr. 97k

    Lil G

    Triple L

    Comment

    • Nay_Sayer
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2011
      • 3837
      • 182
      • 1
      • 49,922

      #42
      Originally posted by RetroSpeed05
      Name a fighter with a better resume from 126-135.
      What does everyone from 126-135 have to do with Lomachenko's resume?

      I'll ask again; Exactly WHO has Lomachenko beaten?

      Comment

      • Madison Boxing
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2015
        • 35364
        • 6,455
        • 3,367
        • 190,590

        #43
        Originally posted by Nay_Sayer
        What does everyone from 126-135 have to do with Lomachenko's resume?

        I'll ask again; Exactly WHO has Lomachenko beaten?
        Russell, linares, rigondeaux, walters. 3 of whom were unbeaten, whilst linares hadnt lost for a long time.

        Comment

        • DuckAdonis
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2017
          • 7775
          • 197
          • 84
          • 188,446

          #44
          Americans who are jealous of the slick Ukrainians

          Comment

          • Larry the boss
            EDUCATED
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2011
            • 90798
            • 6,419
            • 4,473
            • 2,500,480

            #45
            Originally posted by Madison boxing
            Russell, linares, rigondeaux, walters. 3 of whom were unbeaten, whilst linares hadnt lost for a long time.
            so those are great wins for loma?? so why slam Spence and crawford??

            you picked brook to beat spence

            mikey was undefeated when spence beat him yet you wanna give loma credit for beating rigo

            how can you explain that?

            Crawford took Horns 0 while moving up in weight yet you slam him

            Comment

            • Nay_Sayer
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2011
              • 3837
              • 182
              • 1
              • 49,922

              #46
              Originally posted by Madison boxing
              Russell, linares, rigondeaux, walters. 3 of whom were unbeaten, whilst linares hadnt lost for a long time.
              Yep, and NONE of those wins warrant P4P consideration. Not one.

              Face the FACTS, Lomachenko's standout accomplishment is LOSING to Orlando Salido...

              Comment

              • Nay_Sayer
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2011
                • 3837
                • 182
                • 1
                • 49,922

                #47
                Originally posted by larryxxx..
                mikey was undefeated when spence beat him yet you wanna give loma credit for beating rigo

                how can you explain that?
                And if I may add, Spence doesn't have a LOSS to an Orlando Salido type of opponent...

                Comment

                • Larry the boss
                  EDUCATED
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 90798
                  • 6,419
                  • 4,473
                  • 2,500,480

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Nay_Sayer
                  And if I may add, Spence doesn't have a LOSS to an Orlando Salido type of opponent...
                  op does this all the time and exposes himself as the true biased poster

                  Comment

                  • Madison Boxing
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2015
                    • 35364
                    • 6,455
                    • 3,367
                    • 190,590

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Nay_Sayer
                    Yep, and NONE of those wins warrant P4P consideration. Not one.

                    Face the FACTS, Lomachenko's standout accomplishment is LOSING to Orlando Salido...
                    What fighters in their prime have a better set of wins currently?

                    Comment

                    • Madison Boxing
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2015
                      • 35364
                      • 6,455
                      • 3,367
                      • 190,590

                      #50
                      Originally posted by larryxxx..
                      so those are great wins for loma?? so why slam Spence and crawford??

                      you picked brook to beat spence

                      mikey was undefeated when spence beat him yet you wanna give loma credit for beating rigo

                      how can you explain that?

                      Crawford took Horns 0 while moving up in weight yet you slam him
                      Mikey was much smaller and he wasnt no rigondeaux. That was considered much more of a competitive.match up than mikey/spence, didnt.roy jones say it was the best fight ever? Brook was coming off a loss and likely weight drained but it was a decent win. Horn is C level.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP