Though it is a comeback fight after Canelo waxed him.
But the su****ion is that 3G knows if he keeps fighting top guys he will rack up several defeats, look at the evidence - since Jacobs, his first top contender, he has gone 1-1-1 (noone in their right mind would include Vanes) His legacy relies on him keeping defeats to a minimum.
If he fought 5 top contenders now, he would rack up another 2 or 3 defeats, and his career would look overblown.
Last edited by DreamFighter; 04-17-2019, 01:28 AM.
GGG was supposed to face Canelo, but Canelo got suspended for testing positive. GGG was afraid of Derev? Are you serious? GGG just finished a training camp, was understandably angry, and wanted to fight on Cinco de Mayo. Derev wanted to delay the fight for June at the earliest, and GGG refused.
But don’t let facts come in the way of your tongue over Canelo’s nuts...
yea he was, Golovkin ducked Derevyanchenko because he was afraid that he would lose
and he got stripped for his trouble
that is in the book, so yea..... no excuse is required lol
the very second that Saunders said he would be available in June, there was no other fight to make..... Golovkin avoided two threats, walked away from his dream, and got stripped
fkn disgraceful
fans who support that bullshlt are NOT boxing fans, they are Golovkin fans
Canelo is facing a guy ggg already beat, but yea, it’s a bigger risk than whoever this rolls guy is...or Brian Adams.
The guys you mention offer similar risk, but much less reward than canelo. If he was to lose to one of those guys, he can kiss the canelo payday goodbye...which is probably exactly what guys like you want to see happen lol. I mean ggg is on his way out the door and he still wants to fight the top guy in the division. Pac don’t want none of Spence, and nobody blames him a bit.
Funny seeing you in a ggg thread btw. How long until you start having a complete spazz and need to go on timeout?
Golovkin has been selecting no-hopers in favor of a challenge his entire career
also, if the excuse that you just used is true, then what does this mean.....
Comment