Comments Thread For: Wilder: Everything Fury Gained, He'll Lose it By Facing Schwarz!

[LoadedWraps]

So NOT guaranteed then. I think we agreed.

If Eddie wants the fight he'll make a proper simple offer after the miller fight, when he can guarantee a fight with AJ. And the offer doesnt need to involve Wilder selling his soul to Eddie for multiple fights, back stabbing his current team/network, giving exclusive rights to DAZN etc... It just needs to be a simple normal offer.

Eddie needs to understand Fury is the A side, and Eddie and AJ both will be on the outside looking in once Dury takes his soul and they are left without belts.

[5000boxing]

Crazy stuff!

How do you explain that there are people known as "Native Americans" who have their own independent history?

Lmao.. them fools are called 5 dollar indians. Most came over later from asia, bred with with English settlers for 5 bucks! Lol

[davefromvancouv]

Oh you mean Lou contradicting himself just like the whole camp does? Yeah, nothing new here. Sorry.

Actually, he totally destroys the BT controversy and is incredulous that anybody would be ****** enough to believe it. Which is probably why you're quick to discredit what he says.

[davefromvancouv]

davefromvancouv, did you actually listen to that interview yourself? If you did, then why are you telling blatent lies about it?

Frank Waren did not say that BT were "only consulted to understand UK rights to the fight"

He clearly says that BT wanted to put the fight on themselves.

Rob Tebbut: "The first I heard of it today was that you were privy to that due to a wanting from BT to potentially put the Wilder/Joshua fight on BT, is that correct?"

Warren: "Well that's what they were doing. They offered the guarantee of the 50 and the 30 on the strength of buying the rights to put the fight on. I'm sure if I'd been in Hearn's position I'd want the fight and I'd say well no, it's got to go on Sky. But the fact was, that was the conversations I was having with Shelly. We wanted to put the fight on BT and we had a lot of conversations about it"

I've time stamped the video were that part of the conversation begins:

Yes, conversations. With the ultimate goal to get an offer together to send to Hearn. A Sky offer. Confirmed by Stephen Espinoza. So the conversations with Warren were to understand UK rights to the fight because, you know, FRANK WARREN HAD NO PROMOTIONAL INTERESTS IN A WILDER-JOSHUA FIGHT!!!

[vitali1999]

VERY debatable, considering 99% of the refs disagree with Reese.

Cooking the numbers I see. Who's the 1 percent, Richard Steele ? Ha

[kafkod]

Yes, conversations. With the ultimate goal to get an offer together to send to Hearn. A Sky offer. Confirmed by Stephen Espinoza. So the conversations with Warren were to understand UK rights to the fight because, you know, FRANK WARREN HAD NO PROMOTIONAL INTERESTS IN A WILDER-JOSHUA FIGHT!!!

Espinoza has zero credibility on this subject after being called out and owned by Hearn on twitter over his lies.

You posted an interview with Frank Warren without even listening to it and ended up owning yourself!

Nowhere in that video does Warren say what you were claiming he said .. that BT were only consulted for advice on UK rights.

Frank Warren: "We wanted to put the fight on BT and we had a lot of conversations about it"

[kafkod]

VERY debatable, considering 99% of the refs disagree with Reese.

US fans crying because they didn't get a "UK stoppage" in a US ring are hilarious!

And what isn't debatable is that Reiss made the right decision, because Fury was ok after beating the count and ended up battering Wilder round the ring for the rest of the fight!

[kafkod]

he was knocked out yet he was talking to the ref. MIND BOBBLING!

Yes, and even a knocked out Tyson Fury talks more sense than Wilder and his crazy fans.

[kafkod]

Lmao.. them fools are called 5 dollar indians. Most came over later from asia, bred with with English settlers for 5 bucks! Lol

The crazy shit that racists dream up to justify their racism never ceases to amaze me.

[davefromvancouv]

Espinoza has zero credibility on this subject after being called out and owned by Hearn on twitter over his lies.

You posted an interview with Frank Warren without even listening to it and ended up owning yourself!

Nowhere in that video does Warren say what you were claiming he said .. that BT were only consulted for advice on UK rights.

Frank Warren: "We wanted to put the fight on BT and we had a lot of conversations about it"

Yes. That's what he said. Which means what? That Warren wanted to promote Joshua on BT or that Finkel wanted to find out more about the UK rights to the fight? Because Warren and BT had nothing to do with Joshua or Wilder, right? So obviously Warren was being consulted by Finkel to formulate an offer to Hearn. Warren says so himself in the interview when he says the offer for Hearn would have to be on Sky. This is then confirmed by Espinoza and DiBella.

Is this making sense yet?