- -Seem to recall a Canelo vs Fury thread not so long ago, so this just a continuation of dumb threads.
''The Fight I Want The Most...'' Canelo vs Spence Jr.
Collapse
-
-
With a name like Mexican puppet why doesn't your opinion surprise me?
With that being said your opinion means less than zero because you're a puppet and therefore can't be objective.
You can keep your circle jerk opinions to yourself and leave it to posters who are capable of some objectivity.Last edited by HarvardBlue; 03-26-2019, 11:40 AM.Comment
-
He hardly landed anything significant on Mayweather. In fact he was embarrassingly outclassed. He chased Lara around the ring for 12 rounds not being to cut the ring off and was in danger of losing the fight. Old man Cotto did way better than anyone expected him to so that's another bad example.The stationary theory helps the betting odds on spending trill with Canelo.
Canelo was able to hit and sneak attack on Floyd better than everyone else since Guerrero. Canelo was able to land on the non stationary Lara. Canelo was able to land on the grand master mover in Cotto.
Canelo is full of surprises. Canelo vs Jacobs will be a great fight! Only on DAZN!
You've been sh_tting on Spence since he beat Mikey so you're opinion if suspect also.
I wish people would just tell us how bias they are before they decide to respond. This way we know if we should just ignore you are take you seriously.Comment
-
Well thank you for acknowledging significance, very hard to get fans to admit that. However, as far as the sweet science goes, there were times when Canelo popped Floyd with a jab vs Pacquiao having to tag unorthodox trough angles, but that’s classic PAC. Still, Guerreo through Berto, no other fighter tagged Floyd as good and he was 23 drained at 152, having throuble at 154 from Cintron Mosley and Lopez. Best way to fight Floyd was Maidana es que and Pac style, balls out with combinations and that would favor the judges. The problem with Canelo is that his scoring was based on the tip of what a Canelo at 24 could do to Floyd, which at times were impressive, but not enough, and as many said, boxing Floyd was a bad idea.He hardly landed anything significant on Mayweather. In fact he was embarrassingly outclassed. He chased Lara around the ring for 12 rounds not being to cut the ring off and was in danger of losing the fight. Old man Cotto did way better than anyone expected him to so that's another bad example.
You've been sh_tting on Spence since he beat Mikey so you're opinion if suspect also.
I wish people would just tell us how bias they are before they decide to respond. This way we know if we should just ignore you are take you seriously.
Whatever, the loss is a loss. ATG’s and HOF’s hace losses. Canelo has significantly gained in IQ and style and is in his prime. As is Spence. Spence will have to date to be great. Canelo is being punked at 168-175 with promoters and industry talking about it. Meanwhile Spence whom walks around 180lbs is being comforted at 147. It is what it isComment
-
I agree, I don't think Spence would have trouble getting to 160 and being very good at that weight either.
Canelo/Spence would be a competitive fight.Comment
-
I don't see anything in Spence that would give Canelo any issues. But if Errol wants to "dare to be great" like Mikey and get his own ass whooping then why not?Comment
-
Comment
-
That would ruin Spence. He'd take a huge beating and wouldn't be the same after, sort of like Kelly Brook and the GGG fight.Comment
-
Interesting fight at 154. GGG beat Canelo with his jab--Spence just threw over 600 jabs in his fight with Mikey. If Canelo can't solve Spence's jab, he is in for a long night.Comment
Comment