Lopez Laughs: Loma Is Not Doing Well!

[daggum]

Lopez is top 5. He is ranked #4 by the WBA.

yeah and edis talbi is #3 according to the ibf.

[4truth]

Jealous much??

[BoxingIsGreat]

lomas resume isnt better than tanks? hard to take you seriously. russell beat the #1 guy in the division after losing to loma but thats not good enough for you i guess yet you like tank who has never even beaten a top guy. weird.

aww he really wants the fight and i really want a million dollars so? do you not believe in meritocracy? crolla and commey are more proven. why should lopez jump them? if lopez was more of a star then the fight would have a better chance at happening but since there are no stars in the division besides garcia(who's not available) the top ranked guys should get a shot first right? makes all the sense in the world but you like the arbitrarily picking a guy you like and giving him a shot better ok.

Enjoy the Crolla fight. I'm done here.

[daggum]

Was Pedraza a big ticket seller and fan favorite, though?

repeating yourself? lopez is not a title holder, top contender, mandatory, or popular fighter. pedraza and crolla both fit some of that criteria. lopez fits none therefore no fight. pretty standard. you are demanding loma fight an undercard fighter who hasnt beaten a soul. does that not seem silly to you when you zoom out?

[BoxingIsGreat]

Pedraza was a world champion... not to mention, Lomachenko was coming off a shoulder injury/surgery layoff. You want to try that again?




Lopez hasn't even beaten a top 10 fighter.

Lopez has never been a world champion, nor does he have any world title of significance.

You really want to keep pushing this narrative that fighting a "potential" future champion is better than fighting a proven, world champion in that same weight class?

That doesn't even make sense. Lopez shouldn't even be on the radar until he does something to earn that fight. Having a loud mouth and no resume doesn't earn you that fight. He's not even a mandatory.


Lomachenko should be going after fighters like Mikey (which he has already been vocal about many times), Commey (which was possibly in the works before Commey was injured), Easter Jr., Berchelt, etc.

Not unproven fighters like Lopez. "Oh, he beat a kid who never beat anyone. Wow, Lomachenko is cherrypicking".

Reminds me of all the comments before he fought Walters "Lomachenko is ducking Walters, Walters would knock his ass out. Arum is protecting him"

before he fought Rigo
"Lomachenko ducked Rigo and won't fight him/Lomachenko is going to get schooled" (even some claimed Lomachenko ducked him at 126 when it was Rigo that ducked that fight previously, LOL).

Walters was a ONE hit wonder. Never good. I guess Loma should follow the rankings and see where it gets him.

[BoxingIsGreat]

Titles, rankings, and shit. Use your own God damn eyes and mind. Loma needs to fight challenges.

[daggum]

Enjoy the Crolla fight. I'm done here.

what no!i wanted you to say more silly stuff about how loma and tank have similar resumes and how beating the #1 guy in the division isn't relevant. you cant give up now.

[daggum]

Walters was a ONE hit wonder. Never good. I guess Loma should follow the rankings and see where it gets him.

and lopez is a no hit wonder...unless we use our eyes! oh yes now i see the hype!

[BoxingIsGreat]

How many fights does Loma have going forward? If I stretch it, I'd say 4. Let them count.

[daggum]

Titles, rankings, and shit. Use your own God damn eyes and mind. Loma needs to fight challenges.

almost every single prospect looks good knocking over these bums. you cant decipher who is going to be great and who isnt based on beating menard and magdaleno. you just cant. menard was knocked out cold vs beltran. should we use our eyes and say beltran is great and deserves the loma fight? what about magdaleno? quickly ko'd in 2 by light punching flannagan. should we use our eyes and minds to say flannagan deserves a loma fight? it seems like the less a guy is tested the more you think hes great. it should be the opposite