Should Dillian Whyte be installed as the WBC Mandatory?

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

Yes, he did. that's a fact.

Name them??

[LacedUp]

Look at this clown trying to change the subject. I don’t care who is better. Dillian Whyte ran from two eliminators so he has to get in the back of the line. Point blank period. No matter how good YOU think Parker is the point is Whyte ducked the Pulev eliminator to fight Joseph Parker. And he ducked the Ortiz eliminator to fight Chisora. This not a discussion about Parker skills we’re talking about why Whyte doesn’t deserve a title shot until he fights in a final eliminator

Whyte ducked Pulev to fight Parker

Shows how little you know.

[LacedUp]

Name them??

Helenius, Browne and Parker.

[MastaBlasta]

Look at this clown trying to change the subject.r

Hahahaha! Those hearnies do that all the time. If I don't stop laughing I'm gonna have a hernia. (hearnie-a)

[pillowfists98]

Whyte had his chance at a title shot against AJ but he priced himself out of the fight. Tough luck bud.

[N/A]

You can rate Dillian Whyte or not but his run of wins is better than anybody's outside of the belt holders. He absolutely deserves a world title shot.

That's not how boxing works. If you beat good competition, earn a slot in a final eliminator, and then turn down the final eliminator, you're not going to be the mandatory. Whyte's done this multiple times now. With both the IBF and the WBC.

[Rock&Roll]

whyte, thus far, has refused to fight a final eliminator. if he wants to become someone's mandatory, he'll likely have to win a final eliminator.

doesn't matter if you're rated #1. doesn't matter if you're silver champion of copper champion. doesn't matter if you're international champion or southern area champion.

all that stuff just gets you in position for a final eliminator. if you don't fight a final eliminator, you're unlikely to be named mandatory.

I thought for a second you were finally speaking our language...
But in your last sentence you said 'unlikely'. Unlikely means possible, giving the appearance of solidity in pure wind - just in case 'we be crooks' decide to change rules on the fly, as illigitimate organizations do.

[N/A]

I thought for a second you were finally speaking our language...
But in your last sentence you said 'unlikely'. Unlikely means possible, giving the appearance of solidity in pure wind - just in case 'we be crooks' decide to change rules on the fly, as illigitimate organizations do.

I'm not just speaking about the WBC, I'm speaking about all of the organizations. Some are stricter than others about final eliminators, but generally speaking, reaching the #1 rating isn't what makes you mandatory. Winning a final eliminator is what makes you mandatory. Yes there are exceptions like the WBO's super champion rule, but as far as Whyte is concerned, any of the four orgs will likely require him to win a final eliminator to become mandatory.

As for your "We Be Crooks" nick name, it's interesting you label the WBC as crooks when they're the only org that hasn't been rocked with a huge bribery scandal.

[Rock&Roll]

I'm not just speaking about the WBC, I'm speaking about all of the organizations. Some are stricter than others about final eliminators, but generally speaking, reaching the #1 rating isn't what makes you mandatory. Winning a final eliminator is what makes you mandatory. Yes there are exceptions like the WBO's super champion rule, but as far as Whyte is concerned, any of the four orgs will likely require him to win a final eliminator to become mandatory.

As for your "We Be Crooks" nick name, it's interesting you label the WBC as crooks when they're the only org that hasn't been rocked with a huge bribery scandal.

Bribery is only one form of corruption. Why use such a specific word?

Do you want me to talk about Don King and We Be Crooks? Let’s talk about mandatory challengers ONLY, since we’re on the topic.

Why was Chavez Sr - promoted by King - the mandatory challenger for Kostya Tszyu's WBC super lightweight title? Chavez had not fought at super lightweight for two years, had recently lost to journeyman Willie Wise, and had not beaten a top contender since losing his first fight to ODLH four years earlier.

Why was Mike Tyson - promoted by King - the #1 contender for WBC heavyweight title when he was released from prison? Tyson hadn’t fought in four years.

The WBC stripped Javier Castillejo of his super welterweight title for fighting Fernando Vargas instead of Ricardo Mayorga - promoted by Don King. The WBC qualified Mayorga for a shot even though he had never fought at that weight limit and had lost two of his last three fights.

When will wbc make Cinnamon fight Charlo, so everyone else in line can have their crack at the title. It’s supposed to be 1 mandatory a year. Time is ticking...

Honarable mention: Chavez - promoted by King - draw against Pernell Whitaker. Two of the judges were not appointed by the state's boxing commission, instead they were appointed by the WBC. Don King had a hand in choosing the WBC judges for the fight. Whitaker won 8-9 rounds in that fight.

[Ray*]

Definitely, i don't think he needs to fight anyone to solidify that too. His resume is better than most of HW, to have the resume he has now and never to have fought for a title, shows you how bad the sport is. All these guys (Joshua, Fury, Ortiz, Wilder, Breazeale, Miller etc) didn't do enough to get their shot.