Should Dillian Whyte be installed as the WBC Mandatory?
Collapse
-
yea AJ wasnt a belt holder until the fight after Whyte (Charles Martin). Whyte had a title shot if he signed the contract for 3 belts at wembley so he cant be upset about having to fight an eliminator. Ortiz/Whyte would be perfect eliminator in the "losers bracket"Comment
-
You either accept what’s offered or you fight an eliminator thouh right ? Whyte refused terms from Hearn for AJ and ducked Pulev just like Miller did only then Miller accepted what Hearn was offering leaving Whyte out in the cold.
I think he deserves the fights as he was offered by Hearn for AJ but you’ve got to accept your worth if you don’t you follow the mandatory route of course, let’s be honest though is Whyte really good enough to beat Ortiz and Pulev I dont believe he is imo.Comment
-
Wilder doesn't want to fight Whyte, and there is absolutely no way Sulaiman is going to go against the wishes of his boss.
Besides, every press conference Sulaiman and the WBC hold, takes up more valuable oxygen from the rest of us. They don't deserve any of it.Comment
-
I must have been thinking of the WBC International then. Or something like that. Either way, he didn't win.Comment
-
Simple solution to me is to make his next fight an eliminator. Given it is expected to be Povetkin or Ortiz then both of them would be more than credible opponents in my eyes (Brezeale vs Molina for example was considered a final eliminator)Comment
Comment