GGG most overated fighter of this Generation
Collapse
-
how did he duck lara? oh cause lara "called him out" surely you have more than that right? lara desperately tried to make the fight and made ggg amazing offers and ggg still wouldn't fight him oh wait no, his team publicly said they would only fight ggg for millions, hes not in the same division as ggg, brings no money and did absolutely nothing to try and make the fight. weird how it didn't happen! shocking really. you really understand how boxing works! the call out from the unknown guy not in his division who wanted millions didnt get the ggg fight. you know what this is clearly a duck by ggg. i mean lara called him out! thats all it takes!
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Dance84
Most overated fighter of this era . Fought bums all the way . Was trying to fight the smaller weaker cotto a ,he was willing to fight against Chavez and froch at 168 but wanted a catchwreight of 164 against ward . Ward didn't wait around for GGG he moved up to 175 for a fight against Kovalev ward took risks . GGG called out Canelo and waits for Canelo,Canelo is the one who steps to middleweight once again another fighter who actually takes risks . As soon as the middleweight division is filled with good fighters GGG's only focus is Canelo and always has been. He gives up his belt ibf to avoid his dangerous mandatory in derevyanchenko to fight Canelo he goes ask for "Mexican style " and gets backed up by the smaller man dosent do mexican style . He comes back signs with dazn says he wants to fight the best the best and says he would still fight Canelo if Canelo loses the Jacobs once again still after Canelo he is obsessed with Canelo his entire career revolves around him . In his next few fights he is just gonna bum bash his next 4 four fights . He is rates #2 best middleweight by espn he is the most overated fighter of this generation. Never moved up will always obsess with Canelo . Even in his grave he will be obsessed with Canelo. Best record( one controversial draw one controversial loss both against canelo another controversial win against Danny Jacobs (refuses to rematch) best name and officall win David Lemieux or Kell Brook . So get mad if you want or don't . He never took risks was never about it .(154-168) never happened ducked Lara ,Andrade ,Ward,Charlo ,Derevy Derevyancheno, most overated boxer of this generation. Was never about 154-168 was never about that Mexican style either
Cuz you have no come back to his post....LMMFAO!Comment
-
Overated by some, underated by others, although your post actually doesn't really touch on his H2H ability, but focuses his resume and career choices, which ain't really about whether he was overated or not and can be argued from a lot of angles. It's my personal belief we never saw the best of Golovkin and certainly his resume falls well short of what I believe he could have achieved in ideal circumstances, but whether you attribute that more to bad luck or bad decision making (or indeed a combination of the two) is really down to interpretation.
Cut it out he's overrated. His team KNEW it & that's the reason they waited for the Nelo sweepstake. It aint rocket science my dude.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Hagler actually fought everyone and fought all the new guys on his block he took risks . GGG didn't do that he is just a guy a obsessed Canelo that's it it's always been that way he doesn't fight no one just the facts that he said he would fight Canelo again even if he loses to Jacobs goes to show how obsessed he isAnd what does any of that mean?- He won the title. It doesn't matter if you think his opponent was worthy of being champ or not. Then he set the record for title defenses in the division.
- He had a couple of close fights against the best in the division and arguably won them all. Big deal.
- Hagler never fought outside of the division. Does that make him overrated too?
- He gave up his belt to make $35M against the #1 guy in the division. He took the toughest fight he could and it's life-changing money.
But none of that will matter to you because you'll never listen to reason. There's no reason to debate it because it's like trying to debate a 9/11 conspiracy theorist or an anti-vaxxer. It's not worth my time or effort.
Enjoy your Two Minutes HateComment
Comment