Comments Thread For: Jacobs Believes His Opinion That GGG Won Has Offended Canelo

[saopaulo]

i see jacobs outpointing 8-4 7-5 then getting robbed. only canela a-sslickers wont agree

[PunchyPotorff]

Sounds like Jacobs is trying to summon up some bravery as the fight nears. He KNOWS he lost to GGG. Anything else is just delusional blabbering on his part. Yet he still won't stop blabbering he supposedly won. And he SHOULD know this will be the toughest fight of his career so far.

[BigStomps]

Lol.

It’s all about context. If Canelo or a fighter has nanograms or picorgrams from a post fight urine and blood test then that’s at least something to believe a fighter fought in the ring with something as those cyclists like Contador or Armstrong whose legacy faults were all based on in competition usage. Many people don’t even know that Contador’a results were based during the days he was cycling with picorgrams, so WADA was trying to figure out how he had molecular Traces during the days of cycling...

Canelo’s fight was cancelled because he had Traces 80 days away. I think it was all a cover up to delay the fight and get the knee surgery. A poor way to get out of a fight. It just doesn’t make any sense.

Yeah Canelo is intentionally gonna use PEDs to get out of a fight and in the process lose fan's, millions of dollars, and tarnish his legacy...
You've gotta be the ******est motherfuccer on here, for real!
And that's saying alot cause I had jab jab boom with that title till you came along,...

[KO MX]

If Jacobs fights like a man he is getting Knocked out,but i think that once he feels Canelo's power he will run ala Lara and cry a robbery

[komandante]

Legions believed Golovkin won I- II.

[FeFist]

How can you think someone won by a split decision? A split decision is the result of different opinions.

[Thuglife Nelo]

Yeah Canelo is intentionally gonna use PEDs to get out of a fight and in the process lose fan's, millions of dollars, and tarnish his legacy...
You've gotta be the ******est motherfuccer on here, for real!
And that's saying alot cause I had jab jab boom with that title till you came along,...

Nope. Can you name two GBP fighters who fought and had cases of Clenbuterol in their system the week of the fight and the other 45 days away from the fight?

Name those two, and ask yourself if GBP took a gamble that VADA and the WBC wouldn’t have cared even though it was all accidental.

Take your time. Seriously, take your time. Canelo was exonerated by industry and VADA themselves that it was conclusive to meat contamination. So in the end, GBP had no fault.

Canelo isn’t tarnished. He never failed a post fight test as any athlete in the world does when “cheating.” People don’t know the difference of post toxicity and 80 days away of picorgrams lol.

[Citizen Koba]

I never understood how a person can score a fight and get a Split decision.

Jacobs isn't as smart as he sounds.

You see that amusingly often. Guess multiple personality disorder is more common than the medical experts would have us believe.

[Johnny_Roa]

Jacobs is just playing dumb, he knows he's losing a decision and getting the best pay he has ever gotten.

[Citizen Koba]

Nope. Can you name two GBP fighters who fought and had cases of Clenbuterol in their system the week of the fight and the other 45 days away from the fight?

Name those two, and ask yourself if GBP took a gamble that VADA and the WBC wouldn’t have cared even though it was all accidental.

Take your time. Seriously, take your time. Canelo was exonerated by industry and VADA themselves that it was conclusive to meat contamination. So in the end, GBP had no fault.

Canelo isn’t tarnished. He never failed a post fight test as any athlete in the world does when “cheating.” People don’t know the difference of post toxicity and 80 days away of picorgrams lol.

Man. You still ****ing the drum on the Clen thing? There's nothing conclusive either way and the use of the term 'conclusive to' is wrong here (and I'm not just talking about your grammar )... the term that you're looking for is 'consistent with'. 'Conclusive' indicates the evidence overwhelmingly supports a single explanation of an event whereas evidence can be 'consistent with' multiple hypotheses.

VADA did not exonerate Canelo, the WBC loudly proclaimed his innocence in the absence of conclusive evidence (and indeed before there was any evidence at all beyond his failed tests results) and NSAC did not rule on intent, merely on the fact of his having failed a test.

However, Robert Bennett of the NSAC said in the complaint that “Alvarez’s utilization, ingestion and/or consumption of Clenbuterol, whether intentional or not, constitutes an anti-doping violation.” He added that “by allowing Clenbuterol to enter his system, Alvarez engaged in conduct that reflected discredit to unarmed combat and he is guilty of foul or unsportsmanlike conduct that was detrimental to a contest.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.51190aab77d5