Name the fights you feel Canelo shouldnt have got the W for?

[_original_]

Mayweather but that goes without saying.

He clearly lost to GGG twice I had him losing to Lara in a close one (neither fighter being impressive).

[R_Walken]

Canelo should have at least 4 Ls on his record ; there should be no debate he lost to

Mayweather
Lara
Golovkin (2)

I think if Canelo wasn’t judged differently from every other fighter he would have received at least 1 draw against either Trout / Cotto

It’s not only that he won fights he shouldnt have its that in every one of those fights ( except Golovkin 2) He receives at least 1 judges scorecard that is so far off the mark you wonder if their even watching the fight.


114-114 Mayweather
118-110 Golovkin
117-111 Lara
119-109 Cotto
118-110 Trout


You can’t think something isn’t up or defend it. And sure as sh.it a second judge will always give him the benefit and anytime it was ruled 7-5 in favour of Canelo or 6-6 in the first Golovkin fight . Every Judge in that gave Canelo the deciding scorecard for his undeserved win/draw
Everytime gave Canelo the 12th. How can you look at that as anything other then su****ious or corrupt


Even in the Golovkin rematch which couldn’t have repeated the scorecard f.uckery in the first fight

it was scored by 2 judges 115-113 . One of them gave Canelo 6 of the first 8 rounds and the other 6 of the first 9 . So Canelos guaranteed at least a draw by the time 2/3 of the fight is done. Not hard to give him 1 of the last 3-4 rounds for the win , by mere coincidence they both gave Canelo the 12th for the W. Not as blatant as the first but very su****ious how it was scored . More of a down low type f.uckery

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Floyd


I thought he beat everyone else, and had GGG 1 a draw. Canelo won the first 3 and last 3 rds, ggg everything inbetween. 2nd fight was clearly a canelo win.

Lara fight was close but I thought canelo had it 115-113




Danny jacobs is a huge test, and might be canelos toughest matchup style wise in his career. This is a 50/50 fight

[lolpz]

He lost the Lara fight, that's it. (Obv the Mayweather fight as well)

[BigStomps]

To me they think they are equal to Canelo. I don't think Canelo is charismatic, but apparently millions do since he is truly a PPV star. He became a star on his own. Marquez was great counter puncher but has no X factor of any kind. Had it not been for his Pacquiao fights he would be as well known as a Castillo. Not a PPV attraction ever and he can't figure out why since he worked so hard and acheived greatness in the ring. Canelo's record speaks for itself, he didn't need a B side for any of his fights. Even Mayweather made money on Canelo's coattails otherwise it would be 300K PPV sales like he had against Berto. Marquez career is not memorable at all once you take Manny's name off. That's why he's jealous. When I say this I am not knocking the man or his abiliity. He was a great.

Agree with everything you said man! I couldn't of said it better myself!

[SplitSecond]

Only the golovkin and mayweather fights.

[Redd Foxx]

He clearly got clowned against Mayweather.
Trout was close.
Lara was close.
Golovkin fights should have been losses, particularly the first.

[mrlopez]

It's not so much the fights I thought Ginger lost, it's about what seems like a prefilled scorecard in favor of him.....from the Mayweather fight to Cotto to GGG (1st fight). There are more, but that's just off top

[Idunnoshet]

I had Canelo Losing to Mayweather .
Had the first GGG fight as a legit Draw .

[chirorickyp]

Canelo should have at least 4 Ls on his record ; there should be no debate he lost to

Mayweather
Lara
Golovkin (2)

I think if Canelo wasn’t judged differently from every other fighter he would have received at least 1 draw against either Trout / Cotto

It’s not only that he won fights he shouldnt have its that in every one of those fights ( except Golovkin 2) He receives at least 1 judges scorecard that is so far off the mark you wonder if their even watching the fight.


114-114 Mayweather
118-110 Golovkin
117-111 Lara
119-109 Cotto
118-110 Trout


You can’t think something isn’t up or defend it. And sure as sh.it a second judge will always give him the benefit and anytime it was ruled 7-5 in favour of Canelo or 6-6 in the first Golovkin fight . Every Judge in that gave Canelo the deciding scorecard for his undeserved win/draw
Everytime gave Canelo the 12th. How can you look at that as anything other then su****ious or corrupt


Even in the Golovkin rematch which couldn’t have repeated the scorecard f.uckery in the first fight

it was scored by 2 judges 115-113 . One of them gave Canelo 6 of the first 8 rounds and the other 6 of the first 9 . So Canelos guaranteed at least a draw by the time 2/3 of the fight is done. Not hard to give him 1 of the last 3-4 rounds for the win , by mere coincidence they both gave Canelo the 12th for the W. Not as blatant as the first but very su****ious how it was scored . More of a down low type f.uckery

Brudda that is THE Best analysis I ever read on the subject and makes the scam even more evident than I thought. Especially when he pretty much gets the first 6 rounds. It's a predetermined system that ensures a draw as the worst case scenario.
He's a great fighter what harm is there to lose a close one when he will get the rematch and possibly perform better. That's real competition.