Comments Thread For: Whyte Aims To Become WBC Mandatory if Wilder Faces Breazeale

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • THEFRESHBRAWLER
    Undisputed Champion
    • Jul 2013
    • 9408
    • 372
    • 230
    • 124,804

    #61
    Originally posted by yard man
    honestly you Wildher fan girls talk so much shyt it is unreal. how is fighting a bum like ortiz do anything for is career or make him any money ? who the fu in the uk would go watch Whyte vs Ortiz on a ppv card over a former world cham. Whyte should be fighting Wilder and yes Whyte would beat is ass thats why the wbc is keeping him away, the WbC should do the decent think by cleaning up the mess and let whyte at least fight brazle for mando spot.
    Fighting Ortiz would have got him the title shot you idiot. That’s why bums with no rep shouldn’t even discuss boxing.
    why did the cheater Whyte run from TWO title eliminators? I usually don’t respond to bums who are nobodies. Get your rep up before you respond to me. He ran from Pulev and Ortiz. The cheater deserves no title shot until he earns.

    Comment

    • THEFRESHBRAWLER
      Undisputed Champion
      • Jul 2013
      • 9408
      • 372
      • 230
      • 124,804

      #62
      Originally posted by DougalDylan
      This makes no sense, there is and has never been a mandatory slot for fighting Ortiz. The WBC said if he fought Ortiz he could have a fight in 6 years time, being a mandatory to a mandatory.

      Wilder fights his mandatorys at a rate of 1 every three years and the WBC would get him a chance that he might get to be manadatory after Brezeale finally got a fight with Wilder.

      Fighting Ortiz is worthless other than ranking points on boxrec :-(
      Shut up he ran from the IBF title eliminator also. Now what you have to say about the IBF. Let’s face it the cheater Whyte wants an easy path to a title.

      BED311-B2-4-F31-4579-89-E6-7-F19-F6-E222-EB

      Comment

      • Ake-Dawg
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2016
        • 5510
        • 127
        • 80
        • 76,361

        #63
        Originally posted by Ray*
        Doesn't matter to me, unless there is some sort of protecting Wilder campaign going on here. I don't see how Wilder/Breazeale fighting as Voluntary and Whyte getting his mandatory shot affects anyone or anything.

        We know Wilder/Fury/Joshua isn't happening, people can discuss who ducked who until the kingdom comes but its not happening. We need to move on from those fights and get the others their chances.
        I'd rather see Wilder fight Kownacki and Whyte than Breazeale. He may fashion himself as a tough SOB but he is target practice for Wilder.

        Comment

        • Ray*
          Be safe!!!
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2005
          • 44867
          • 1,654
          • 1,608
          • 558,890

          #64
          Originally posted by Ake-Dawg
          I'd rather see Wilder fight Kownacki and Whyte than Breazeale. He may fashion himself as a tough SOB but he is target practice for Wilder.
          Nah thats the easy way out, I don't know why some fans want easy fights for Wilder.

          Comment

          • Ake-Dawg
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2016
            • 5510
            • 127
            • 80
            • 76,361

            #65
            Originally posted by Ray*
            Nah thats the easy way out, I don't know why some fans want easy fights for Wilder.
            What's easy about swapping Kownacki for Breazeale? I rate Kownacki above Breazeale.

            Comment

            • Ray*
              Be safe!!!
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2005
              • 44867
              • 1,654
              • 1,608
              • 558,890

              #66
              Originally posted by Ake-Dawg
              What's easy about swapping Kownacki for Breazeale? I rate Kownacki above Breazeale.
              He is just easy, still a baby in HW terms. I guess its better to catch them when they are still learning, vulnerable. Has he even face any adversity in his 17 fights? Like when Fury was just coming off two tune ups after 2 and half years away.

              You want to throw him in there with Wilder? Thank God you weren't Wilder's manager.. You would have had him fighting Arreola's after 15 fights instead of 35 odd fights later.

              Comment

              • Ake-Dawg
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2016
                • 5510
                • 127
                • 80
                • 76,361

                #67
                Originally posted by Ray*
                He is just easy, still a baby in HW terms. I guess its better to catch them when they are still learning, vulnerable. Has he even face any adversity in his 17 fights? Like when Fury was just coming off two tune ups after 2 and half years away.

                You want to throw him in there with Wilder? Thank God you weren't Wilder's manager.. You would have had him fighting Arreola's after 15 fights instead of 35 odd fights later.
                This a comparison between Kownacki and Breazeale. Yet you mention nothing about Breazeale.

                What is it about Breazeale that makes you rate him above Kownacki. Experience? He has what 5 more fights and dropped multiple times by Ugonoh and caught consistently by Negron. Kownacki just looks better. Has better foot and head movement and we know that Breazeale goes down as evidence by Ugonoh and Joshua.

                Comment

                • Ray*
                  Be safe!!!
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2005
                  • 44867
                  • 1,654
                  • 1,608
                  • 558,890

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Ake-Dawg
                  This a comparison between Kownacki and Breazeale. Yet you mention nothing about Breazeale.

                  What is it about Breazeale that makes you rate him above Kownacki. Experience? He has what 5 more fights and dropped multiple times by Ugonoh and caught consistently by Negron. Kownacki just looks better. Has better foot and head movement and we know that Breazeale goes down as evidence by Ugonoh and Joshua.
                  If I need to tell you more about how Breazeale is better at the moment than the novice kownacki then you either in the wrong sport or a wilder Stan or probably both.

                  Comment

                  • Ake-Dawg
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jun 2016
                    • 5510
                    • 127
                    • 80
                    • 76,361

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Ray*
                    If I need to tell you more about how Breazeale is better at the moment than the novice kownacki then you either in the wrong sport or a wilder Stan or probably both.
                    NEED? I asked for your opinion AFTER giving you mine. Again you gave ZERO positives about Breazeale just a few shortcomings for Kownacki. As I alluded to, in spite of your stated shortcomings Kownacki is still a better match up than Breazeale.

                    Maybe you can tell me about how the novice who despite being just over 3 years younger than Breazeale has been a pro longer. Maybe you can tell me what the 2 fight difference in their resume means.

                    Or maybe you can cut the bs and say in boxing terms why you think Breazeale is a tougher fight than Kownacki.

                    Comment

                    • Ray*
                      Be safe!!!
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 44867
                      • 1,654
                      • 1,608
                      • 558,890

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Ake-Dawg
                      NEED? I asked for your opinion AFTER giving you mine. Again you gave ZERO positives about Breazeale just a few shortcomings for Kownacki. As I alluded to, in spite of your stated shortcomings Kownacki is still a better match up than Breazeale.

                      Maybe you can tell me about how the novice who despite being just over 3 years younger than Breazeale has been a pro longer. Maybe you can tell me what the 2 fight difference in their resume means.

                      Or maybe you can cut the bs and say in boxing terms why you think Breazeale is a tougher fight than Kownacki.
                      Again if I need to tell you why a novice like Kownacki isn’t ready for those names over someone like Breazeale then you need to follow another sport.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP