Joshua had 1 good fight,Wilder had 2

[EL_GRINGO]

Pure entertainment value and excitement, fights that kept you at the edge of your seat Wilder has the upper hand in my opinion

Joshua vs Klitscko was a great fight
Wilder vs Ortiz was great and
Wilder vs Fury

I'm not a fan of either guy, this is my unbiased assessment so far

[Robbie Barrett]

Was Wilder-Fury exciting? It wasn't even competitive. A 1 sided fight with 2 knockdowns.

[4truth]

Was Wilder-Fury exciting? It wasn't even competitive. A 1 sided fight with 2 knockdowns.

lol, you're kidding, right?

I know you always want to have something negative to say but at least think before you respond or start a thread.

[Robbie Barrett]

lol, you're kidding, right?

I know you always want to have something negative to say but at least think before you respond or start a thread.

Without the knockdowns it was a **** fight. 20 seconds of excitement makes a great fight?

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

Tyson Fury is a cheater

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

lol, you're kidding, right?

I know you always want to have something negative to say but at least think before you respond or start a thread.

Lol wilder has him losing his mind.

[REDEEMER]

Wilder s fights are more exciting because he's usually behind in them and needs a comeback of sorts so you're wrong he has several exciting ones against C level guys as well.

The difference between the two is in Joshua fights you get to see far better rhythm between the fighters showing good skills and engaging . Theyre one sided but that's because Joshua is not Wilder he's a very dominant He who rarely loses rounds but that's not his fault and you can't penalize the harder fighter to defeat . The fighter himself though an aggressive K.O artist is going to be far pleasing to the eye so , I would go with AJ here anyway .

[Kezzer]

Pure entertainment value and excitement, fights that kept you at the edge of your seat Wilder has the upper hand in my opinion

Joshua vs Klitscko was a great fight
Wilder vs Ortiz was great and
Wilder vs Fury

I'm not a fan of either guy, this is my unbiased assessment so far

Wilder vs Fury was awful. All what happened was fury got up from a strong hit? What was entertainment other than that?

[that g]

smh so what exactly the point of this thread? trying to change the narrative only works when there aren't established, objective facts.

in 40 fights, wilder has had ONLY TWO vs actual competitive opponents, in which he basically needed miracles to win. never mind the fact that both opponents had no business being in the ring at the time, but yea, he's fought "killa after killa" doe.

Joshua has had 22 fights, unified twice, defended 7 times, fought at least 8 top 10 opponents. but they aren't as "exciting" because he always finds a way to get them out early.

[EL_GRINGO]

smh so what exactly the point of this thread?

in 40 fights, wilder has had ONLY TWO vs actual competitive opponents
Joshua has had 22 fights, unified twice, defended 7 times, fought at least 8 top 10 opponents. but they aren't as "exciting" because he always finds a way to get them out early.

1.The point of this thread that is just my personal observation and opinion,that's all it is

2. that's still one more competitive opponent then joshua has had

3. That's because his oppositions was decent but not good enough to pose a threat, and you knew he was supposed to win and likely going to win, which he also did.