Comments Thread For: Fighter of The Decade? Mayweather, Ward Top List of Candidates

[GreenNinja111]

Andre Ward! #1

[champion4ever]

Lomachenko is the BEST. But he doesn't have enough to be the favorite. As in, he should be the choice, but there's room to make case for a lesser fighter w/ more fights and more marquee events.

Fury could have done it, but for the lay-off. If he hadn't been robbed against Wilder, him beating AJ this year could have put him over the top.

Also, for popping dirty for doping and PED use.

[crold1]

I think it’s Floyd and then Ward or Roman. Cotto, Canelo, and Pac is a hell of a trio and all went on to big wins after

[Thraxox]

Mayweather was the best boxer to grace a ring in that era. And he never lost.

An opinion, not a fact. And also, you got to be kidding about 2000-2009 decade award given to Floyd. Manny already beat 3 ATG's ( 2 of them in their prime.) with the 7 weight climb And ended the decade almost killing Cotto.

There was a reason 97% of writers agreed Pacquiao was the fighter of the decade/

[alexnation]

LMAO Ward should not be in the conversation here. Probably the least active fighter of all times. He beat Kovalev in their first fight the same way Canelo beat GGG in their first fight - he didn't.

May, Pac, Craw and maybe Loma.

For those talking about Canelo - Chavez jr and Fielding? really? lol. The duck of the decade

[ShoulderRoll]

An opinion, not a fact. And also, you got to be kidding about 2000-2009 decade award given to Floyd. Manny already beat 3 ATG's ( 2 of them in their prime.) with the 7 weight climb And ended the decade almost killing Cotto.

There was a reason 97% of writers agreed Pacquiao was the fighter of the decade/

Floyd is the finest fighter of his generation. In large part due to the things he did in 2000-2009.

His total dominance of Juan Manuel Marquez should have erased any doubt about who really was The Man of that decade.

[Thraxox]

Floyd is the finest fighter of his generation. In large part due to the things he did in 2000-2009.

His total dominance of Juan Manuel Marquez should have erased any doubt about who really was The Man of that decade.

And Pacquiao's total dominance of Miguel Cotto wasn't anything?

[Rusty Tromboni]

Also, for popping dirty for doping and PED use.

Why does that bother you?

It was an amateur mistake. The dude wasn't a veteran and associated w/ a large established camp. Really, that's who they're hoping to catch.

if anything, it means there's a better chance that Fury today is one of the few guys juicing.

He's better than any Heavyweight we've ever seen. That skill doesn't come from a needle in the ass. Unlike someone else we know... to dis day.

[Rusty Tromboni]

His total dominance of Juan Manuel Marquez should have erased any doubt about who really was The Man of that decade.

Yup. Pacquiao.

More than any of the numerous arguments that can be made in the Pac-Mayflower debate, this is the strongest.

[SplitSecond]

Canelo's better than both.

Guererro probably worse than both.

It's irrelevant to the point, if you're going to use P4P rankings as reasoning then be consistent. No more no less.

The Canelo Floyd beat was a better win than Linares?