Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: Wilder-Fury Rematch Will NOT Happen Next

[pillowfists98]

This. Fury's first fight on the deal may have a ratings bump because of the hype, but once he utterly stinks the place out like he always does, that'll be the end of it.

Fury just ducked, took his ball and went home. He knew Wilder would KO him again.

Despite all of his claims otherwise, this is the most blatant admission by Fury that he knows he lost that fight. Competitive fight or not, a KO is final.

You Wilder fanboys are incredibly delusional.

[N/A]

yeah a huge amount of publications had ward beating kovalev in fight 1 and i didnt agree with that either, pure robbery imo

Then that's your problem. A robbery is when there's a critical consensus that one fighter won, but the judges give it to the other fighter.

LA Times, NY Post, Ring Magazine, USA Today, Yahoo, etc all had Ward winning, so it's ridiculous to call it a robbery.

Just because you disagree with a decision doesn't mean it's a robbery.

[kingstip9]

Damn shame. Let’s hope it’s only one fight in between before they fight. Definitely a good buzz in the heavyweight division.

[pillowfists98]

If Fury wins, we would have been guaranteed a rematch. So yeah, people would have cared about a rematch lol.

I don't give a ****. Wilder lost! The Wilder fanboys can live in their little fantasy world but anybody with any working brain cells saw that Fury was robbed.

[CharlieStewart]

If it happens later in the year then its not a duck.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Fury vs Parker more likely. Maybe Fury vs Rivas. Either way, highly unlikely it is Whyte.

Speaking of Whyte, where does he go from here? Not getting Joshua or Breazeale or Wilder.

F*** it not a big fan of interim belts but how about Ortiz vs Whyte for the WBC interim?

[thabanga510]

Then that's your problem. A robbery is when there's a critical consensus that one fighter won, but the judges give it to the other fighter.

LA Times, NY Post, Ring Magazine, USA Today, Yahoo, etc all had Ward winning, so it's ridiculous to call it a robbery.

Just because you disagree with a decision doesn't mean it's a robbery.

No robbery at all. It was a great fight and people like the style they like. Most people expect heavyweights to fight and inflict pain, which is Wilder's goal. Fury does a lot window dressing to try and make it appear he is actually doing something.

[BirdSong]

Then that's your problem. A robbery is when there's a critical consensus that one fighter won, but the judges give it to the other fighter.

LA Times, NY Post, Ring Magazine, USA Today, Yahoo, etc all had Ward winning, so it's ridiculous to call it a robbery.

Just because you disagree with a decision doesn't mean it's a robbery.

Ok take a look at the scorecards for ward/kov1, it will show u that ward won 17 out of the last 18 rounds overall. He won the last 6 rounds on 2 cards and the 3rd judge gave kov the last round, which was a meaningless round scorewise as ward was already 2 up on his card.

Thats a robbery!! Rewatch those last 6 rounds and u must surely agree with that, they took his belts on that crap, unbelievable, i dont need yahoo to tell me thats not a robbery sorry

[KTFOKING]

F*** it not a big fan of interim belts but how about Ortiz vs Whyte for the WBC interim?

Yes!!!! Only problem is Ortiz is fighting on Saturday and Whyte wants to go late April or early May. Probably can make it work mid-late May if Whyte is willing to wait.

[KTFOKING]

I don't give a ****. Wilder lost! The Wilder fanboys can live in their little fantasy world but anybody with any working brain cells saw that Fury was robbed.

You just said Canelo has never robbed anyone yet you consider THIS a robbery? This wasn't all that dissimilar to Canelo/GGG I. In fact, both fights I had it a two point fight for GGG/Fury. If Canelo/GGG wasn't a robbery, then neither was this one.

And I'd agree with that statement.