Thank you for posting this, I had not seen it. I was responding to the article in this thread. Quoted "Of course we were serious about the fight. We wouldn't waste everyone's time with three different offers, we don't do it for fun. AJ controls the finances and the offers came from AJ. As WBO mandatory challenger Dillian was due 20 percent and the final offer was considerably more than that," Hearn told Davies."
Eddie is 100% correct in the interview you posted. Usyk could force everyones hand and demand an automatic title shot. It's a rule that I love. Whyte is ranked #1 if he does or doesn't do that, but being ranked #1 is just a ranking. It's not being #1 contender. The WBO would call a final eliminator. It's why I kept saying that Whyte was being lied to by Hearn when he was saying that he was #1 contender for the WBC. He was/is ranked #1 but he didn't fight in the eliminator. It's also the reason that I said that Hearn has had a habit of lying about this, because he also was saying that the winner of Vargas/Dulorme became the #1 contender for the WBC Welterweight title, which was untrue.
Eddie is 100% correct in the interview you posted. Usyk could force everyones hand and demand an automatic title shot. It's a rule that I love. Whyte is ranked #1 if he does or doesn't do that, but being ranked #1 is just a ranking. It's not being #1 contender. The WBO would call a final eliminator. It's why I kept saying that Whyte was being lied to by Hearn when he was saying that he was #1 contender for the WBC. He was/is ranked #1 but he didn't fight in the eliminator. It's also the reason that I said that Hearn has had a habit of lying about this, because he also was saying that the winner of Vargas/Dulorme became the #1 contender for the WBC Welterweight title, which was untrue.
Comment