Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Warren Reacts To Hearn's Offer Claim For Joshua vs. Fury

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by MC Hammer View Post
    For real because the WBA and WBO explicitly say 60, IBF gives a 90 day voluntary. And Joshua doesn't have the WBC so how can they call him to fight a mandatory before Wilder fights

    So you're pretty much admitting that Wilder can't accept hearn's offer and they are meaningless at this point.
    Not true...Wilder can accept if he wants ALL the belts and a bigger payday.

    Comment


    • #82
      Stick to the facts

      Lets all be real for just one second.....the truth is that AJ is a threat and both Wilder and Tyson want massive pay for a potential career ending fight. I don't blame them or Warren for wanting more or Hearn for negotiating for less because that's what happening here. Frankly, everything else is nonsense, tribal fandom and BS.

      Could Wilder pull off a win? Possibly but not likely. Tyson certainly has a better chance but he would unquestionably be the betting underdog and for good reason.

      Take off the rose colored glasses and see it for what it is.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by factsarenice View Post
        Not true...Wilder can accept if he wants ALL the belts and a bigger payday.
        Then he will get stripped of his WBC and will make less money. The Fury rematch in Vegas is bigger than Joshua at Wembley. Let's say the fight does 650K only in the US which is extremely reasonable. that's about 50mil right there without tickets sales and the rest. Not to mention UK money.

        On the otherhand, AJ is only for British money because it wouldn't be PPV in the US.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by MC Hammer View Post
          Are attempt to come to a deal and coming to a deal the same thing? No they aren't you idiot. So contact has to be made in 30 and a deal reached in 60. But 30 days tho LMAO.

          Either way, you're still missing the point that AJ's offers mean nothing at this time because the purse bid has been set for Wilder-Fury.
          No you ****** they get 30 days to negotiate a deal after that it goes to purse bid. You shouldn't discuss what you don't know about. You've exposed yourself as being full of **** and a bit thick because you can't comprehend the rules.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by factsarenice View Post
            What are you on about? Joshua holds all the belts, he's the draw, that's just a fact.

            AJ fights his mandatorys to keep his belts and ALSO offered Wilder and Tyson record paydays.

            Again those are the facts.
            Those are indeed facts, with the exception that AJ holds all the belts.
            Another inescapable fact is that Wilder and Fury agreed to fight and it captured the imagination of fans, hard-core and casual alike.
            This has, to use the idiom, shot Hearn's fox, as Eddie has lost control of the HW division.
            He now has a stadium booking in April with no credible opponent and will be frozen out until after the Wilder/Fury rematch has concluded.
            I want to see the best meet the best and the winner of Wilder/Fury 2 will be in a position to demand an equal split, which unfortunately for Eddie, will eat into his profit margin.
            The figures for Wilder/Fury vs AJ will be eye watering...and so they should be.

            Comment


            • #86
              50-50? No way that fight would happen! I don't see Hearn accepting that from a business angle

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                No you ****** they get 30 days to negotiate a deal after that it goes to purse bid. You shouldn't discuss what you don't know about. You've exposed yourself as being full of **** and a bit thick because you can't comprehend the rules.
                Even after a purse bid is set, sides can still negotiate. Do you not remember Jacobs vs ggg?

                But either way, You keep ducking the main point. Joshua's offers are meaningless now that the fight has been ordered. That is according to YOUR own argument. :*******:

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Oldskoolg View Post
                  50% at least.....for both fury and wilder. The primadonna days are over for Joshua. Wilder and fury made more and can make double what they made fighting each other and Joshua is totally shut out of the picture with no big fights. Even his sycophantic casual nationalist fans are losing interest. Until he and Hearn learn some humility and stop acting like King Joffe Jafur and Semi, they should be shut out of the big picture.
                  50/50 oh do shut up. Tyson is getting 40% against Wilder but he should get 50% against Joshua.? Why is Wilder offering him only 40% considering he truly lost the first fight and Tyson is fighting away from home yet again and there is only 1 belt on the line. Joshua has 4 belts yet they both deserve 50%. Use your fuc#king brain please your mama didn’t raise no fool

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by MC Hammer View Post
                    Even after a purse bid is set, sides can still negotiate. Do you not remember Jacobs vs ggg?

                    But either way, You keep ducking the main point. Joshua's offers are meaningless now that the fight has been ordered. That is according to YOUR own argument. :*******:
                    A unification will still trump a mandatory. WBC wouldn't strip Wilder for fighting Joshua and delaying the order to fight Fury.

                    Likewise they won't strip Wilder if Fury decides he doesn't want the fight and goes with Joshua.

                    So the offers should and will still get made. Following Hearn's comments they'll be 60/40 splits with two way rematch clauses giving more money to the winner in the second fight.

                    That's going to be very tempting to someone who thinks they can beat Joshua.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by frosty-g View Post
                      You evidently haven’t boxed.

                      Far from the truth

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP