Comments Thread For: Broner: Me & Pacquiao Did VADA Testing 'After I Made Some Noise'

[PsychoPat]

by enhanced beast mode, do you mean on peds?? Because I haven't seen pac in that mode ever since testing became a consistent part of the process leading up to his fights. Actually, kind of odd that neither was tested as recently as December.

Hahaha I know what you mean bro enhanced beastmode last seen against margarito.

[PsychoPat]

PEDS means performance enhancing. They do help with speed, endurance and power and they can help with increased output.

Sure they can, my point was broners been hesitant since maidana doesnt throw enough punches shells up. peds wont alter his damaged fighting spirit.

[Dosumpthin]

Dumb ass, I ask a simple question. Address the fact that it took 3 weeks for the TUE to come to light with the commission sanctioning the fight unaware....

You're the dumbass that's keeps making false statements.

3 weeks. I addressed why the a TUE application can take that long. Its not like your McDonald's application. Part of the application is completed by the doctor. How long it takes for a doctor to confirm a diagnosis depends on the procedure. Don't know how to explain this to you any different.

As far as you mentioning NSAC - NSAC doesn't require a TUE for an IV. WADA does. USADA is a WADA signatory.

2ndly, the NSAC is to be notified of the approval of any TUEs by the USADA. Which they were.


Truth is you're ignorant to the the TUE process. That's why you keep saying "3 weeks".

and fluid being administered at the boxers house with usada no where to be found.

More false statements by you.

The reporter who initiated the rumor that Floyd was caught using an IV later RECANTED HIS OWN STATMENTS.
The reporter went on to admit it was a mistake and indeed USADA DCO was present during the administration of the IV - in which Floyd provided a partial sample before and after the IV.

Why wasn't that declared on his preflight card either. Of course, u cant answer cos you are biased and your fanboyism wont let you.

I can't answer why it wasn't listed no more than you can explain why a torn shoulder wasn't listed.

I will say that "allergies" was listed which indicates a medical concern. Maybe NSAC could've taken the opportunity to investigate. Just like they should've asked why Manny listed PRP treatments, TORADOL and Celestone (24 hour ban) as drugs he was taking without any medical concerns listed.

But let me reiterate, NSAC doesn't ban I Vs and it was common to use them.

You seem to know a lot about what Manny is taking and his cheating ways.

EVRYTHING I SAID IN THIS THREAD CAN BE CORROBORATED WITH FACTUAL INFORMATION AND SOUND LOGIC.

Can't say the same for you. You've said a lot of dumb **** this far.

I need that same energy from you to answer those simple questions not maybe this or maybe that since you give the impression you know facts but I guess that only applies to your Manny take.

I answered your questions.

You're the one being biased once I pointed out Manny uses xcylocaine after you chastised Floyd for allegedly doing so.

Facts.

By the way, that Ped user is about to beat the brains out of your other hero this weekend, so u should be more concerned about him cos Pac is just fine.

I don't **** with Broner. Don't know anyone who likes him. As much dumb **** he does....he comes across as honest.

Pac is a politician. And a liar. Surrounded by liars. I despise liars and cheats. I don't like to be manipulated. **** him.

[boxinggod101]

Yet.....Pacquiao listed lidocaine which is another name for xylocaine on the prefight form as 1 of the drugs....along with the controversial TORADOL..... that he was taking for the Floyd fight.


But that isn't a problem if it's Manny....only if it's Floyd....Who's the fanboy?

both of you

[Dosumpthin]

both of you

Well so be it.

Doesn't change facts. Only opinions.

[Hands of Stone]

You're the dumbass that's keeps making false statements.

3 weeks. I addressed why the a TUE application can take that long. Its not like your McDonald's application. Part of the application is completed by the doctor. How long it takes for a doctor to confirm a diagnosis depends on the procedure. Don't know how to explain this to you any different.

As far as you mentioning NSAC - NSAC doesn't require a TUE for an IV. WADA does. USADA is a WADA signatory.

2ndly, the NSAC is to be notified of the approval of any TUEs by the USADA. Which they were.


Truth is you're ignorant to the the TUE process. That's why you keep saying "3 weeks".



More false statements by you.

The reporter who initiated the rumor that Floyd was caught using an IV later RECANTED HIS OWN STATMENTS.
The reporter went on to admit it was a mistake and indeed USADA DCO was present during the administration of the IV - in which Floyd provided a partial sample before and after the IV.




I can't answer why it wasn't listed no more than you can explain why a torn shoulder wasn't listed.

I will say that "allergies" was listed which indicates a medical concern. Maybe NSAC could've taken the opportunity to investigate. Just like they should've asked why Manny listed PRP treatments, TORADOL and Celestone (24 hour ban) as drugs he was taking without any medical concerns listed.

But let me reiterate, NSAC doesn't ban I Vs and it was common to use them.



EVRYTHING I SAID IN THIS THREAD CAN BE CORROBORATED WITH FACTUAL INFORMATION AND SOUND LOGIC.

Can't say the same for you. You've said a lot of dumb **** this far.



I answered your questions.

You're the one being biased once I pointed out Manny uses xcylocaine after you chastised Floyd for allegedly doing so.

Facts.



I don't **** with Broner. Don't know anyone who likes him. As much dumb **** he does....he comes across as honest.

Pac is a politician. And a liar. Surrounded by liars. I despise liars and cheats. I don't like to be manipulated. **** him.

Answer the questions dumb fu.ck. Why 3 weeks ? NSAC unaware?USADA unaware? why administered at his house and why we still dont know what the fluid is? Typing an essay doesnt make you smart by the way. U ll be taken more seriously if u simply say I dont know why it took that long for him to come out with it and even though we dont know all the facts, it looks su****ious but all this Nevada does or doesnt do this, a reporter does this or that shows the level of your fanboyism and your inability to be objective. Am done with you clown, nothing more worth talking about here. Save your essay for the book, how to slurp up and see no wrongdoing in Floyd. Maybe u can write essays about how he isnt a woman beater either

[EasternEuroFan]

Pacquiao was clearly beaten by Horn then he beat Matthysse who know one knows how much he had left in the tank. Because of this it's not easy to know how good Pacquiao is. This fight might not be as one sided as everyone wants to believe. We will see come fight night especially now that both fighters got tested.

I agree and not even for PED reasons.

Pacquiao is 2 years older than he was when he lost to Horn. He already looked old in that fight, even if some thought he won, it was a struggle. A good Pacquiao beats Horn with ease.

Matthysse was shot to bits and never that great at his best, just dangerous, so what can we really take from that?

Pacquiao's age will show badly at some point very soon and it'll end badly. it might not be this fight because Broner has generally fallen short at the required level but i think it can be more competitive than people think. Pacquiao's style is based on speed, being exposive and dynamic and power. It's not really a good style for a 40 year old to rely on.

[IceTrayDaGang]

I agree and not even for PED reasons.

Pacquiao is 2 years older than he was when he lost to Horn. He already looked old in that fight, even if some thought he won, it was a struggle. A good Pacquiao beats Horn with ease.

Matthysse was shot to bits and never that great at his best, just dangerous, so what can we really take from that?

Pacquiao's age will show badly at some point very soon and it'll end badly. it might not be this fight because Broner has generally fallen short at the required level but i think it can be more competitive than people think. Pacquiao's style is based on speed, being exposive and dynamic and power. It's not really a good style for a 40 year old to rely on.

his speed, explosiveness is still there as seen in training. what im more worried about is his reflex. this will get to him first before losing his speed, etc.

[Dosumpthin]

Answer the questions dumb fu.ck. Why 3 weeks ? NSAC unaware?USADA unaware? why administered at his house and why we still dont know what the fluid is? Typing an essay doesnt make you smart by the way. U ll be taken more seriously if u simply say I dont know why it took that long for him to come out with it and even though we dont know all the facts, it looks su****ious but all this Nevada does or doesnt do this, a reporter does this or that shows the level of your fanboyism and your inability to be objective. Am done with you clown, nothing more worth talking about here. Save your essay for the book, how to slurp up and see no wrongdoing in Floyd. Maybe u can write essays about how he isnt a woman beater either

If you have no idea what it takes to complete the TUE application - How can you say 3 weeks is su****ious?

[Bobby Shaw]

I agree and not even for PED reasons.

Pacquiao is 2 years older than he was when he lost to Horn. He already looked old in that fight, even if some thought he won, it was a struggle. A good Pacquiao beats Horn with ease.

Matthysse was shot to bits and never that great at his best, just dangerous, so what can we really take from that?

Pacquiao's age will show badly at some point very soon and it'll end badly. it might not be this fight because Broner has generally fallen short at the required level but i think it can be more competitive than people think. Pacquiao's style is based on speed, being exposive and dynamic and power. It's not really a good style for a 40 year old to rely on.

You are right on song.