When discussing Hatton - Mayweather

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Easy-E
    Gotta want it
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 22686
    • 865
    • 1,739
    • 32,777

    #51
    Originally posted by Smokin'
    Hatton is stronger then Hearns. Have you seen his legs?
    What are you basing this on??
    Its simply your opinion.

    Comment

    • mECHsLAVE
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2005
      • 1419
      • 137
      • 105
      • 7,736

      #52
      I honestly don't think Hatton is stronger than Hearns was at 147. Hearns had some freakish rangy strength when he was fighting at 147. I mean, we're all guessing, but that's my opinion.

      Hatton is stronger than anyone right now at 140 and under, and I think he showed he was stronger than Collazo, but he did have trouble with the guy's size at times, and Hatton had trouble carrying that extra weight. And even though Collazo is a big welter, I don't think that means Hatton is stronger than any fighter ever at 147. Hehe. That's going too far.

      And I don't think Hatton or Mayweather would have been able to beat Hearns at 147, either.

      And also for the record, right now I'd pick Mayweather over Hatton at 147, but Hatton over Mayweather at 140.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP