GGG resume

[P4PLoser]

If you think about it, GGG's resume is really poor. His three best wins are:

1) Jacobs
2) Lemieux
3) Andy Lee

Really shallow for an elite fighter, therefore not worthy to be HOF.

[abracada]

If you think about it, GGG's resume is really poor. His three best wins are:

1) Jacobs
2) Lemieux
3) Andy Lee

Really shallow for an elite fighter, therefore not worthy to be HOF.

He was avoided.

Canelo in the second fight is the only boxer to give him a battering.

[Jay Volcano]

Cotto has a better resume.

[abracada]

[Spiegelo]

If you think about it, GGG's resume is really poor. His three best wins are:

1) Jacobs
2) Lemieux
3) Andy Lee

Really shallow for an elite fighter, therefore not worthy to be HOF.

Add Canelo, but aside from that I agree, although he had longevity over b class fighters and the top tier ducked him like the plague. Outside of moving up in weight to get ****d by Ward, probably in Oakland, not much he could've done about the resume. It takes two to tango and he was simply outwaited

[abracada]

[DreamFighter]

If you think about it, GGG's resume is really poor. His three best wins are:

1) Jacobs
2) Lemieux
3) Andy Lee

Really shallow for an elite fighter, therefore not worthy to be HOF.

this is a trick question since hes not yet established as an elite fighter, though he is getting there with the canelo draw.

[blue_dolphin]

30 tenshins
jacobs (gift)
canelo (2 losses)
lemeux
brook

[abracada]

30 tenshins
jacobs (gift)
canelo (2 losses)
lemeux
brook

He should man up and fight BJS

[Scary_canary]

If you think about it, GGG's resume is really poor. His three best wins are:

1) Jacobs
2) Lemieux
3) Andy Lee

Really shallow for an elite fighter, therefore not worthy to be HOF.

Andy lee was definitely his best win:wank::wank: