Comments Thread For: Korobov's Manager: Scoring Fight 119-108 For Charlo Outrageous!

[Afi23]

I don't look at robbery in terms of one card but the overall decision. Hazzard jr.'s 119-108 card was completely crazy. I didn't see that as him robbing Korobov. I saw that as him being unfit to do the job to the degree that he shouldn't be allowed to be employed as a judge anymore.

I don't think he set out to take something away from Korobov.

I agree. If he was out "to take something away from Korobov", he would have submitted a close card, a 119-108 only draws negative attention to the judge in close fight.

[The Big Dunn]

I agree. If he was out "to take something away from Korobov", he would have submitted a close card, a 119-108 only draws negative attention to the judge in close fight.

To me that card shows a level of incompetency that can't be overlooked. There is no way he was scoring by the rules.

[K Man]

Im a fan of Korobov BUT he lost. The judges should have had it closer or a split decision for Charlo.

[Robbie Barrett]

That FOX commentary was God awful as well. ANd that ring side scorer they have I guess their version of Harold Ledderman was worse than Ledderman lol

The ringside scorer was the judges father. A disgrace they have a judge who's father works for PBC.

[Clegg]

To me you can tell it's intentional robbery by Hazard because of the way it's almost always in fights where the robbed fighter does better early that these crazy wide scores show up. Another was in Taylor/Postol. Postol+Korobov were ahead after 6 but judges already had them getting dominated, then when Taylor+Charlo did better in the 2nd half of the fight it was too late to produce a closer scorecard without making it obvious and possibly having it highlighted on TV like with Roth's card for the DLH/Tito fight.

That's why I wouldn't call GGG's loss and Fury's draw robbories. Even though they were the B side and didn't get the nod when I thought they deserved it, going into the 12th of both fights, both guys could still win by dominating the 12th. In a robbery they make sure the margin is too wide early on.

[nacho daddy]

I don't look at robbery in terms of one card but the overall decision. Hazzard jr.'s 119-108 card was completely crazy. I didn't see that as him robbing Korobov. I saw that as him being unfit to do the job to the degree that he shouldn't be allowed to be employed as a judge anymore.

I don't think he set out to take something away from Korobov.

it is amazing what some people can make themselves believe. are you insane?

[nacho daddy]

charlow "won" that fight due to institutionalized racism against white fighters in boxing especially East Europeans

[Mammoth]

The one card was bad, really bad, but Korobov was in no way robbed.

[The Big Dunn]

it is amazing what some people can make themselves believe. are you insane?

charlow "won" that fight due to institutionalized racism against white fighters in boxing especially East Europeans

No but you clearly are.

[Boxing Hero]

Im a fan of Korobov BUT he lost. The judges should have had it closer or a split decision for Charlo.

No body is a fan of Korobov. Its gets people upset that this D class fighter didn't get a fair shake against this fighter. The guy put in the work, he beat Charlo. Korobov should be been awarded the decision.