Well, that's no different to the terms in the flat fee that Hearn sent Wilder too. It'd mean Hearn has the rights to sell the broadcasting fights to whoever he chooses, like Wilder's team would have if AJ accepted the $50m.
Both flat fee offers just means you own the fighter for the fight and everything else is under your control.
So for those saying AJ was right to refuse it because the fight might end up on BT or whatever if they won a bid..then Wilder was right to refuse the same treatment.
Both flat fee offers just means you own the fighter for the fight and everything else is under your control.
So for those saying AJ was right to refuse it because the fight might end up on BT or whatever if they won a bid..then Wilder was right to refuse the same treatment.
Comment