Originally posted by BLASTER1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Joshua Will Be Ringside, Scouting The Whyte-Chisora Rematch
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostI find it hilarious that you actually think this bull**** can take away from any of the facts.
You fools were screaming for Joshua to take the Wilder fight but now you think Wilder should just go for the rematch? Haha. You can't even keep your stories straight. You're all over the place with hypocrisy and contradictions. It's really funny. Nice try though. Maybe in your head this nonsense was adequate? Haha.
As I say, you Wilder fans are the biggest nutjobs in boxing. Never have I seen it as crazy as this before. And I saw all the Floyd/Pac nonsense.
Wow, I just realized that you might be some loon entertaining himself during monitored computer time. If so, I wish you well chap. Cheers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dasmius Shinobi View PostI believe is the other way around about the rematch clause and Eddie know a rematch of Joshua vs Wilder is going to sell really well in the USA. If Joshua win or lose, they are going to make the rematch in USA If that contract still on the table. For my understanding, there are details we don't know behind the door, because this time is in private. Eddie Hearn is only using PR tactics for now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostHe didn't want Wilder in the ring without a signed contract. He wasn't into the false hype. And why would he want that only for Wilder to go off and demand half of the money when he's got people wanting the fight? Wouldn't that force Joshua to hand over a **** ton of money because people are now hyped? He's not ****** you know. He wasn't going to let Wilder make a name for himself off his back. Wilder has done that far too much as it is.
Besides, he was talking about another situation that had nothing to do with what we were talking about. Sippy!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostPoser move #3. Accuse someone of being a part of a group of people that believe in a fabricated opinion. Then use that as the basis for an argument.
Wow, I just realized that you might be some loon entertaining himself during monitored computer time. If so, I wish you well chap. Cheers.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostIt doesn't matter what anyone in the past got. All that matters is Wilder was offered more money than he got for the Fury fight. A fight Wilder said was tougher and bigger. It was beneath him that kind of money. Crackhead money is what he called it. So why did this hypocrite coward take less than "Crackhead" money then?
It doesn't matter if the facts are too much for you. You're just going to have to accept them and move on. But no, you want to argue a point that exposes Deontay. Ha.
Hearn is offering Wilder 35% you fool. Wilder and Finkle are not interested.
now you are just being an idiot
FACT: if Wilder is worth 35%, then the earlier offers were BULLSHlT
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostI never said he was worth 35% though did I? I just told you what Hearn is now offering.
Wilder turning down the 15 Mill for Joshua but taking another fight for less proves Deontay is a coward who talks ****. He's never wanted to fight Joshua, Not then, not ever.
Care to talk about Deontay's broken arm that he said he had? How would he have been able to fight Joshua if he had a broken arm?
who cares what you say
HEARN said it.....
"At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair"
https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-if...-50-50--133005
if 35% is fair..... then those earlier offers were..... ?
HINT: it rhymes with funfair
Comment
-
hmmm, now I wonder who Joshua will fight next..... ?
I wonder what Dillian Whyte is paying at the bookies ?
Comment
Comment