Originally posted by Sid-Knee
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Joshua Will Be Ringside, Scouting The Whyte-Chisora Rematch
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostSurprising that Hearn is quoted as saying that he offered Wilder 35% and Boxscene, fighthype, world of boxing, nor badlefthook have run a story on it. No one is interested in hunting down a youtube video where some bloke uses hearn saying Wilder is worth 35% now to ASSUME that the offer he made before the Fury fight was for 35%. What you can do, is what everyone else on here does, is provide a link to back what you're saying. The folks interacting with you currently already think you're full of s hit, how about prove us wrong on this one.
Go and get the information yourself. I'm not your skivvy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostIt's an old insignificant quote? Are you serious right now? Get the **** out of here. It isn't insignificant in any way. It actually exposes Wilder for what he is. A lying coward. And so are you for defending him.
The fact is wilder took less money for what he called a bigger tougher fight in Fury over Joshua. Who cares what the situation is today. He balked at it and said it was beneath him only to prove what a hypocritical coward he is by taking less for Fury.
And as for old quotes... It doesn't stop you lot from going on about the 50 Mill offer does it? You really are a pathetic bunch.
How can Hearn get Wilder in April when they have already said they're going for the rematch? Hearn tried to talk to Finkle and he doesn't want to know.
Fury and Wilder are doing exactly what they should be doing. Marketing and building the rematch. So Hearn can talk about maybe Wilder, maybe Fury, maybe Whyte, but Wilder has to put all his eggs in the Joshua basket and not use the momentum from his last fight? I get it, Eddie didn't tell you what to say and think in a situation where Joshua isn't the only show in town. If you try real hard, you can figure out how to disguise yourself as a real boxing fan and not just a Joshua groupie.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dasmius Shinobi View PostThe money is the problem, Hearn have to give a 65/35 minimum in favor of Joshua to lure Wilder or to put this, he have to offer more than Wilder vs Tyson rematch is going to generate, because we all know this second is going to sell. Maybe in reality Joshua is not a coward and want that fight, is Eddie Hearn who portrait Joshua like that. Eddie Hearn know this is a risky fight to Joshua. In my opinion, I consider Joshua vs Wilder a 50/50 fight type of risky to both. Both have the power to KO each other and end the fight. Now that I mention this, this is the reason why Eddie said he have a two fight deal of one in UK and one in USA. He know this fight is going to generate more money, but he have to respect the WBC champion and give a fair deal, especially for the risk factor he going to UK first to fight Joshua.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostSo you're jumping to a completely different argument altogether now? And you call me the troll? Ha.
You people are ****ing crazy.
So I answered saying no because AJ had a VRO on Wilder if he jumped in the ring.
I don't expect a fighter to get in trouble with the law to call out someone but I expect a fighter to not need his nanny rest as an excuse.
Lol. Owned.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostThis is the poser move you and a select few go to. When repeating the same tired unsubstantiated opinion over and over doesn't move the needle, accuse posters of doing or saying something you feel you can argue against.
Fury and Wilder are doing exactly what they should be doing. Marketing and building the rematch. So Hearn can talk about maybe Wilder, maybe Fury, maybe Whyte, but Wilder has to put all his eggs in the Joshua basket and not use the momentum from his last fight? I get it, Eddie didn't tell you what to say and think in a situation where Joshua isn't the only show in town. If you try real hard, you can figure out how to disguise yourself as a real boxing fan and not just a Joshua groupie.
You fools were screaming for Joshua to take the Wilder fight but now you think Wilder should just go for the rematch? Haha. You can't even keep your stories straight. You're all over the place with hypocrisy and contradictions. It's really funny. Nice try though. Maybe in your head this nonsense was adequate? Haha.
As I say, you Wilder fans are the biggest nutjobs in boxing. Never have I seen it as crazy as this before. And I saw all the Floyd/Pac nonsense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostThe rematch clause is there because Wilder refuses to fight unless he gets one. Even though it has never been done before with a big A side fighter against a B side fighter. Did you see Floyd's opponents getting rematch clauses? Of course not. It's insane. But Eddie offering it up as well as the rematch being in the US is not enough for Wilder still. We have no fight. Funny that isn't it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostWas Joshua not quoted as saying he didn't want Wilder in the ring after the Parker fight. Out of his mouth sippy!
Besides, he was talking about another situation that had nothing to do with what we were talking about. Sippy!
Comment
Comment