Wilder v fury isnt a big fight

[uppercut510]

another post from the most childish pathetic fanbase in the sport of boxing

[Boksfan]

Wilder's bombs and Fury's ring IQ... could be 21st century Rumble in the Jungle.

Why do you talk about yourself in third person?

[billeau2]

Can we quit hyping this up? The term 'big fight' gets thrown around too easy. Theres not much interest in it for a good reason. Its got a crappy undercard and a circus fight main event with someone who hasnt fought a top 100 heavyweight since he put on 10 stone. Wilder winning also does nothing for his resume, lets just make that very clear.

DramaShow I am perplexed as to why you feel so strongly about this. I mean if I understand your "request" it is to downplay this fight at all costs. What would be the logic to that position?

First of all what a lot of people are not getting is that Fury, like Mayweather was born in the gym...

Tis said bey those in ta know the Gypsy King's mother, feeling flush did let out a yelp and jump, she did! into the ring, whereupon with ******* water she did birth that ship known as the "Gypsy King!"

Tyson has been fighting so long that it is second nature to perform in the ring. And while it may be nice to have a great camp, be at your peak, do people really think that the great fighters who fought every month... were always in peak condition, at their best? Fury has enough experience to avoid a big puncher with one super punch.

I actually would worry more if he was fighting a more mobile, two handed fighter who was very active. Someone like Ruiz, or even a guy who throws a lot of leather every round like Big Baby. Big baby would be a much harder fight regarding specific logistics for Fury IMO. Mostly because it would be a grinder! Big Baby would test Fury's endurance... He would have a good chin and wear Fury down and Fury would have to work at a pace that may throw him off.

But Wilder is a fight that Fury should either be able to show an easy victory, or... if Wilder has improved that much, then Fury would have always had a rough time.

This might be an overhype but we have to give Wilder the benefit of the doubt.

[stellen]

Its not a big fight when we all know a grossly unfit fury who aint fought anybody in 3 years gasses out in round 3 and gets knocked out in 4. Nothing super about that. and the alabama chicken gets no credit for that. And you think im going to stay up till 4-5am and watch that on a crappy stream? LOLOLOL no chance.

[WarHagler]

Tyson fury

[Mindgames]

It's still between two undefeated, well known and experienced giants. Two out of the three best heavys in the world. We live in a slightly crappy era, but its alot more exciting than the Wlad grab and lean era of 20 faceless fall guys.

[Mindgames]

DramaShow I am perplexed as to why you feel so strongly about this. I mean if I understand your "request" it is to downplay this fight at all costs. What would be the logic to that position?

First of all what a lot of people are not getting is that Fury, like Mayweather was born in the gym...

Tis said bey those in ta know the Gypsy King's mother, feeling flush did let out a yelp and jump, she did! into the ring, whereupon with ******* water she did birth that ship known as the "Gypsy King!"

Tyson has been fighting so long that it is second nature to perform in the ring. And while it may be nice to have a great camp, be at your peak, do people really think that the great fighters who fought every month... were always in peak condition, at their best? Fury has enough experience to avoid a big puncher with one super punch.

I actually would worry more if he was fighting a more mobile, two handed fighter who was very active. Someone like Ruiz, or even a guy who throws a lot of leather every round like Big Baby. Big baby would be a much harder fight regarding specific logistics for Fury IMO. Mostly because it would be a grinder! Big Baby would test Fury's endurance... He would have a good chin and wear Fury down and Fury would have to work at a pace that may throw him off.

But Wilder is a fight that Fury should either be able to show an easy victory, or... if Wilder has improved that much, then Fury would have always had a rough time.

This might be an overhype but we have to give Wilder the benefit of the doubt.

Im suprised you think Miller could test Fury. He's extremely over weight, slow and im not sure about this chin thing. Cro cop had him hurt with a left hook, and hes not a big puncher. And Miller has fought no one.

[KTFOKING]

Can we quit hyping this up? The term 'big fight' gets thrown around too easy. Theres not much interest in it for a good reason. Its got a crappy undercard and a circus fight main event with someone who hasnt fought a top 100 heavyweight since he put on 10 stone. Wilder winning also does nothing for his resume, lets just make that very clear.

"Can we quit hyping this up?"

Why do you care what others hype up? If you don't think it is a big fight then fine, don't talk about it. But why are you telling others not to hype it up if they feel it is a big fight/event?

[Boksfan]

Im suprised you think Miller could test Fury. He's extremely over weight, slow and im not sure about this chin thing. Cro cop had him hurt with a left hook, and hes not a big puncher. And Miller has fought no one.

All you said can be applied to Fury also.

[Cobra Curry]

The best opponent Joshua faced is a 41 year old Klitschko coming off a 2 year layoff. Tyson Fury beat a younger and fresher Klitschko in 2015. Fury is more motivated and in better shape now. Wilder will have faced better opposition than Joshua by the end of this fight.

How can you **** on about Klitschko being inactive and ignore what Fury's done over the past three years?
How come age doesn't matter when discussing Luis Ortiz?