Originally posted by JWHardin
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Porter: Thurman Wants Rematch, Negotiations Have Begun
Collapse
-
-
Thurman-Porter 1 was one of the best high level welterweight fights i've ever seen.
The ebb and flow was amazing. And Keith looked surpremely focused inbetween rounds before the 12th
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by KnickTillDeaTh View PostThat's factually incorrect. It's said a lot here but it is not necessarily true. Sanctioning bodies can "CHOOSE" to make a title unification priority over a mandatory, it's considered a special sanction. The WBC "CAN" decide at it's own discretion to make a champion from another organization the mandatory challenger, which would then take precedent over any existing mandatory that was previously ordered. That can only be decided after a vote by the WBC's governing board, which only happens once a month at the convention. Either way in this case it wouldn't matter, because the WBC already made Thurman a champion in recess. When Thurman gave up his title, the board of governors voted and approved giving Thurman first shot at the title, leap frogging any challenger or mandatory upon his request, that includes unification. Once Thurman requested a title fight at the convention, the WBC had to honor it. So, even if they voted and made Spence the mando for a special sanction, unless contracts were already signed, Thurman's request would have surpassed Spence.
Comment
-
Originally posted by champion4ever View PostYes but not right now. According to the WBC's rules and protocols; A fighter is forbidden to have any voluntary defenses of a title he won while it was vacant, until he completes at least two mandatory challenges of it.
Once Porter completes his two mandatory title defenses of Keith Thurman and Andre Berto, then he will be free to have his choice of any fighter; Including Erroll Spence, Jr. For a unification bout at 147 but not before he completes his two mandatory defenses.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by filup79 View PostNobody is talking about making Spence the mando. Porter could fight Spence instead of his mandatory because it would be a unification. Otherwise Porter would have to fight his mandos instead of fighting anyone other than Spence or Crawford, since both those would be unification fights. He can't just fight a Ortiz or Khan next.
3.8 Special Bout Sanction(s).
Under special circumstances, including but not limited to as a
bout involving an elite contender, a champion of another organization, a match or
tournament that the WBC determines in its sole discretion would be in the best interests of
boxing, or any other applicable special circumstance, the WBC may order and/or sanction
any such bout, or each associated tournament bout, as either a voluntary or mandatory
defense under such terms and conditions as the WBC may impose in its sole discretion, and
may order that any such special bout take precedence over and occur prior to any previously
designated mandatory defense.Last edited by KnickTillDeaTh; 11-02-2018, 02:12 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by filup79 View PostI'm done with you, you just don't get it. Khan, Collazo or Broner would be fights considered voluntary defenses. He can't make those fights do to the mandatory, but he can fight either Spence or Crawford, those aren't considered voluntary defenses, they are unification fights that trump a mandatory. Porter will hide behind the I need to fulfill my 2 mandatory's to duck Spence.
3.3 Qualified Challengers. Champions shall defend their titles, either in a voluntary or
mandatory defense, against a challenger (each, a “Qualified Challenger”) in one of the
following categories:
(a) any of the top ten (10) rated contenders; or
(b) with the approval of or ratification by a majority of the Board of Governors,
i. any boxer rated 11 to 15;
ii. a champion or a highly-rated boxer of another weight division;
iii. another WBC champion, such as a WBC Diamond or Silver Champion,
Champion Emeritus, or Champion in Recess;
iv. a former world champion or other elite challenger;
v. a champion of another boxing organization recognized by the WBC
3.4 Voluntary Defenses.
In order to fulfill their requirement to defend the title regularly in a
timely manner, champions shall propose voluntary defenses against Qualified Challengers
as defined above. No bout shall qualify as a voluntary defense other than as permitted by
the WBC in accordance with these Rules & Regulations or any WBC rulings. Any bout
(voluntary or mandatory) in which a WBC World Champion would compete for or defend a
title or status other than his WBC World Championship, even if the WBC title is also at
stake, is not permitted absent special circumstances, and then only following a prior written
request to and approval by the WBC, which in its sole discretion may approve, deny, or
impose such terms and conditions as it may determine appropriate under the facts and
circumstances on a case-by-case basis.
3.8 Special Bout Sanction(s).
Under special circumstances, including but not limited to as a
bout involving an elite contender, a champion of another organization, a match or
tournament that the WBC determines in its sole discretion would be in the best interests of
boxing, or any other applicable special circumstance, the WBC may order and/or sanction
any such bout, or each associated tournament bout, as either a voluntary or mandatory
defense under such terms and conditions as the WBC may impose in its sole discretion, and
may order that any such special bout take precedence over and occur prior to any previously
designated mandatory defense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by filup79 View PostI'm done with you, you just don't get it. Khan, Collazo or Broner would be fights considered voluntary defenses. He can't make those fights do to the mandatory, but he can fight either Spence or Crawford, those aren't considered voluntary defenses, they are unification fights that trump a mandatory. Porter will hide behind the I need to fulfill my 2 mandatory's to duck Spence.
It's because Porter cannot be recognized as their champion unless he defeats the mandatory lineal champion Keith Thurman and an additional mandatory defense against Andre Berto. It doesn't matter if he is a titleholder.
Until he defeats the lineal champion in the ring he won't be regarded as the WBC's legitimate champion until he has two mandatory defenses of that WBC title. So therefore, he cannot unify the championship belts until he defeats Thurman and Berto.
He is still isn't recognized as the legitimate WBC champion because he won a vacant title. He did not defeat the champion to get the belt. Therefore, he gets no voluntary defenses at this time even though he's a current title holder along with Spence.
However, Erroll actually earned his place by defeating the lineal champion in Kell Brook in the ring in order to become the new, legitimate, recognized and undisputed IBF welterweight champion of the world.
I just don't know what is it so hard for you guys to understand. Let's say that Porter defeated the champion Keith Thurman for his vacant title then he would be entitled to trump a mandatory in that case but he didn't. He won a title that was vacant.
Lastly, you cannot have a unification title bout with another titleholder by winning a vacant title. You are going to have to defeat the lineal champion and a mandatory or two first in order to do so.Last edited by champion4ever; 11-02-2018, 02:23 PM.
Comment
Comment